title: [Caesarean section: low transverse (pfannenstiel) or midline incision? (author's transl)].
abstract: In 67 elective Caesarean sections and 70 emergency sections the effect of the duration of anaesthesia upon the condition of the newborn was examined. The induction-delivery time (IDT), the operation time (OT), and the difference between these, delta t, were correlated with the 1-, 5- and 10-minute Apgar scores and the pH's of the venous and arterial umbilical cord blood. A highly significant negative association was found for the pH in the umbilical vein and delta t in the series of primary sections. Analysis of the emergency sections showed a negative association between the operation time and the 5 minute Apgar score, and a positive association between the delta t and 1 minute Apgar score. Despite these findings we have observed that the induction-delivery time which we are able to achieve in our hospital has no negative effect upon the biochemical condition (pH) of the newborn. A comparison of 619 sections performed by low midline incision with 328 section by Pfannenstiel incision showed no difference with regard to postoperative complications such as disturbance in wound healing or haematoma formation. In conclusion, with respect to the IDT and postoperative complications we have found no contraindication to the use of the low transverse Pfannenstiel incision for Caesarean section.
mesh_terms: D001034:Apgar Score; D002585:Cesarean Section / Q000379:methods*; D004630:Emergencies; D005260:Female; D005312:Fetal Blood; D006801:Humans; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011247:Pregnancy; D013997:Time Factors; D014469:Umbilical Arteries; D014471:Umbilical Veins; D014945:Wound Healing
vernacular_title: Sectio caesarea: Pfannenstiel- oder Längsschnitt?