The frontal CNV: its dissimilarity to CNVs recorded from other sites.
Two new techniques were used to study the distribution of the CNV recorded from the scalp of humans. One technique was for the suppression of eye movements and the elimination of them fron the average data. The other technique was for the recognition of differences in the form of CNVs recorded from different sites. The latter technique utilized an average vertex CNV as a template pattern against which CNVs from the vertex, left and right frontal, central and parietal sites were matched. The results showed that the frontal CNV was different in form from the vertex, central and parietal Cnvs and that the vertex, central and parietal CnvS were similar in form. An analysis of the amplitudes of CNVs showed that the frontal CNVs were significantly smaller than the CNVs from all other sites, that the vertex CNV was significantly larger than the parietal or central CNVs and that the central CNV was significantly larger than the parietal CNV. There were no differences in amplitude between hemispheres within Condition A responding with the right hand) or Condition B (responding with the left hand) or between Conditions A and B. The results are discussed with respect to their possible theoretical implications.
D000328:Adult; D003265:Contingent Negative Variation; D004569:Electroencephalography / Q000379:methods; D004576:Electromyography; D004585:Electrooculography / Q000379:methods; D004594:Electrophysiology; D005133:Eye Movements; D005260:Female; D005625:Frontal Lobe / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012535:Scalp