[Comparative study of immunoelectrophoresis (IEF) and immunoelectroosmophoresis-immunodiffusion (IEOF-ID) used in the diagnosis of paracoccidioidomycosis].
Immunoelectroporesis (IEF) and immunoelectroosmophoresis-immunodiffusion (IEOP-ID) (1) were comparatively used in the diagnosis of 16 patients with mycologically proved paracocidioidomycosis. In IEF, 5 different precipitin arcs were found and identified with arabic numbers. Arc. '1', cathodic, present in all the patients, is assimilated to specific arcs previously described by other authors. In IEOP-ID both 'cathodic' and 'anodic' arcs were observed in all the sera. A high number of precipitin arcs were revealed by IEOP-ID technique in comparison to IEF in every case. This should be due to the presence of cathodic arcs 'I' and '2' of the immunoelectrophoregram at both sides of the IEOP-ID preparate.
D000946:Antigens, Fungal; D003378:Counterimmunoelectrophoresis; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D006801:Humans; D005779:Immunodiffusion; D007122:Immunoelectrophoresis; D010228:Paracoccidioides / Q000276:immunology; D010229:Paracoccidioidomycosis / Q000175:diagnosis*; D011234:Precipitins / Q000032:analysis
D000946:Antigens, Fungal; D011234:Precipitins
Estudio comparativo de la inmunoelectroforesis (IEF) y de la inmunoelectroosmoforesis-inmunodifusion (IEOF-ID) aplicadas al diagnostico de la paracoccidioidomicosis.