Surface smoothness and marginal fit with phosphate-bonded investments.
Two phosphate-bonded investments and one calcium sulfate investment were evaluated for the surface smoothness and marginal fit they impart to gold castings. A modified technique was also evaluated for each phosphate-bonded investment, where the silica sol was not diluted and the spatulation time was reduced. The results of this study lead to the following conclusions: 1. The marginal fits obtained with all four phosphate-bonded methods were comparable to each other and superior to that obtained with the calcium sulfate investment. 2. The presence of nodules on the surface of the castings was more prevalent with the phosphate-bonded investments. However, this effect was not statistically significant. 3. Clinical assessment of the roughness of the castings revealed that all the methods tested produced clinically acceptable castings. 4. Visual observation by five dentists revealed that both the recommended and modified techniques for one of the phosphate-bonded investments (Ceramigold) produced a smoother surface than any other investment tested. Rating of scanning electron microscope photographs (X600) revealed no difference in the surface roughness between any of the castings. Consequently, no definitive relation between investment type or technique and surface roughness was established. 5. No correlation was demonstrated between surface roughness, as evaluated by either clinical observation or scanning electron microscope photography, and marginal fit of the castings.
D003722:Dental Alloys; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003734:Dental Casting Investment; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D005782:Gels; D010710:Phosphates; D012822:Silicon Dioxide; D013499:Surface Properties; D014885:Waxes
D003722:Dental Alloys; D003734:Dental Casting Investment; D005782:Gels; D010710:Phosphates; D014885:Waxes; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D012822:Silicon Dioxide