title: Light scattering vs. microscopy for measuring average cell size and shape.
abstract: Light-scattering photometry is compared with electron and light microscopy as a source of information about the average size and shape of cells in population. Examined are the effects of limited instrument resolution, necessary experimental procedures, and cell heterogeneity. Information theory is used to survey the relative amounts of information provided by photometric and microscopic measurements. Then in model exploratory experiments, cell size and shape and changes therein are determined both by microscopy and by photometry for spherical and spheroidal cells. Scattering theory is used to calculate photometrically observed light from cell parameters. It is found that if certain other appropriate information about the morphological property of interest is available, then visible light photometry is the preferred method for obtaining quantitative information. It has good absolute sensitivity (0.01-0.10 micrometers resolution), its results are relatively unaffected by sample heterogeneity, it is nondestructive and compatible with many other techniques, it requires no sample preparation, and it provides its information in real time.
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002477:Cells / Q000166:cytology* / Q000648:ultrastructure; D008027:Light; D008853:Microscopy / Q000379:methods; D008854:Microscopy, Electron / Q000379:methods; D012542:Scattering, Radiation; D013053:Spectrophotometry / Q000379:methods
references.citation: J Colloid Interface Sci. 1968 Jul;27(3):458-74
references.pmid: 4875174
references.citation: J Histochem Cytochem. 1976 Jan;24(1):298-304
references.pmid: 1254925
references.citation: J Lab Clin Med. 1975 Aug;86(2):326-43
references.pmid: 1151155
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1975 May;51(1):1-12
references.pmid: 1142776
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1968 Dec;21(3):348-67
references.pmid: 5719249
references.citation: J Colloid Interface Sci. 1968 Jul;27(3):475-8
references.pmid: 5666492
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1967 May;50(5):1377-99
references.pmid: 6033591
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1960 Feb;235:525-30
references.pmid: 14429694
references.citation: J Atheroscler Res. 1965 Jul-Aug;5(4):440-4
references.pmid: 14321357
references.citation: Biophys J. 1977 Nov;20(2):221-32
references.pmid: 303121
references.citation: Science. 1977 Oct 14;198(4313):149-57
references.pmid: 905822
references.citation: Arch Biochem Biophys. 1977 Apr 15;180(1):151-9
references.pmid: 856039
references.citation: Biophys J. 1977 Jan;17(1):95-101
references.pmid: 831858
references.citation: Nature. 1968 May 4;218(5140):438-41
references.pmid: 5649693
references.citation: Biophys J. 1972 Jul;12(7):764-73
references.pmid: 4556610
references.citation: Biophys J. 1974 Feb;14(2):124-9
references.pmid: 4813156
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1972 Dec;37(3):493-501
references.pmid: 4645360
references.citation: Life Sci. 1967 Sep 15;6(18):1983-6
references.pmid: 4964033
references.citation: Arch Biochem Biophys. 1969 Dec;135(1):109-17
references.pmid: 4903240
references.citation: Arch Biochem Biophys. 1969 Dec;135(1):97-108
references.pmid: 4903244