title: The cost of evolution and the imprecision of adaptation.
abstract: Comparisons of six hypothetical cases suggest that Haldane overstimated the cost of natural selection by allele substitution. The cost is reduced if recessive alleles are advantageous, if substitutions are large and few, if selection is strong and substitutions are rapid, if substitutions are serial, and if substitutions in small demes are followed by deme-group substitutions. But costs are still so heavy that the adaptations of complex organisms in complex and changing environments are never completed. The rule probably is that most species most of the time are not fully adapted to their environments, but are just a little better than their competitors for the time being.
mesh_terms: D000220:Adaptation, Biological; D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D008433:Mathematics; D008954:Models, Biological; D012641:Selection, Genetic
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 May;71(5):1670-1
references.pmid: 4525286
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Sep;71(9):3716-20
references.pmid: 4530332
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Oct;71(10):3863-5
references.pmid: 4530266
references.citation: Science. 1972 Aug 25;177(4050):664-9
references.pmid: 5054142
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Apr;73(4):1360-4
references.pmid: 1063417
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Sep;72(9):3748-52
references.pmid: 1059164