title: Flagellar hydrodynamics. A comparison between resistive-force theory and slender-body theory.
abstract: This paper investigates the accuracy of the resistive-force theory (Gray and Hancock method) which is commonly used for hydrodynamic analysis of swimming flagella. We made a comparison between the forces, bending moments, and shear moments calculated by resistive-force theory and by the more accurate slender-body theory for large-amplitude, planar wave forms computed for a flagellar model. By making an upward empirical adjustment, by about 35%, of the classical drag coefficient values used in the resistive-force theory calculations, we obtained good agreement between the distributions of the forces and moments along the length of the flagellum predicted by the two methods when the flagellum has no cell body attached. After this adjustment, we found the rate of energy expenditure calculated by the two methods for the few typical test cases to be almost identical. The resistive-force theory is thus completely satisfactory for use in analysis of mechanisms for the control of flagellar bending, at the current level of sophistication of this analysis. We also examined the effects of the presence of a cell body attached to one end of the flagellum, which modifies the flow field experienced by the flagellum. This interaction, which is not considered in resistive-force theory, is probably insignificant for small cell bodies, such as the heads of simple spermatozoa, but for larger cell bodies, or cell bodies that have large-amplitude motions transverse to the swimming direction, use of slender-body theory is required for accurate analysis.
mesh_terms: D005407:Flagella / Q000502:physiology*; D008433:Mathematics; D008954:Models, Biological; D009068:Movement
references.citation: Biophys J. 1971 May;11(5):446-63
references.pmid: 5103880
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 1965 Aug;43(1):155-69
references.pmid: 5894323
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1968 Aug;52(2):283-99
references.pmid: 4234210
references.citation: Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1973;2:181-219
references.pmid: 4270528
references.citation: Science. 1972 Nov 3;178(4060):455-62
references.pmid: 4673044
references.citation: Biophys J. 1972 May;12(5):564-86
references.pmid: 5030565
references.citation: J Biomech. 1975 Jul;8(3-4):229-36
references.pmid: 1171103
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 1970 Oct;53(2):445-64
references.pmid: 5529723