title: How many base-pairs per turn does DNA have in solution and in chromatin? Some theoretical calculations.
abstract: Calculations on a 20-base pair segment of DNA double helix using empirical energy functions show that DNA can be bent smoothly and uniformly into a superhelix with a small enough radius (45 A) to fit the dimensions of chromatin. The variation of energy with the twist of the base pairs about the helix axis shows the straight DNA free in solution is most stable with about 10 1/2 base pairs per turn rather than 10 as observed in the solid state, whereas superhelical DNA in chromatin is most stable with about 10 base pairs per turn. This result, which has a simple physical interpretation, explains the pattern of nuclease cuts and the linkage number changes observed for DNA arranged in chromatin.
mesh_terms: D002843:Chromatin; D004247:DNA; D004278:DNA, Superhelical; D009690:Nucleic Acid Conformation
chemical_list: D002843:Chromatin; D004278:DNA, Superhelical; D004247:DNA
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Mar;74(3):801-5
references.pmid: 265575
references.citation: Nature. 1977 Jun 16;267(5612):585-90
references.pmid: 301613
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jan;75(1):103-7
references.pmid: 272625
references.citation: Nature. 1977 Sep 1;269(5623):29-36
references.pmid: 895884
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1977 Mar 15;110(4):699-700
references.pmid: 859179
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1976 Dec 25;108(4):619-49
references.pmid: 798036
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Sep;73(9):3068-72
references.pmid: 1067602
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1971 May 28;58(1):277-88
references.pmid: 5104368
references.citation: Science. 1974 Jan 25;183(4122):330-2
references.pmid: 4128918
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jun;72(6):2002-6
references.pmid: 1056008
references.citation: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1975 Dec;55(6):1363-7
references.pmid: 54437
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 May;72(5):1843-7
references.pmid: 168578
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Dec;72(12):4876-80
references.pmid: 174079
references.citation: Nature. 1974 Sep 20;251(5472):249-51
references.pmid: 4422492
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1974 Jan 25;82(3):393-420
references.pmid: 4856348
references.citation: Biopolymers. 1974 Jan;13(1):217-26
references.pmid: 4818129
references.citation: Science. 1974 May 24;184(4139):868-71
references.pmid: 4825889
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1973 Dec 5;81(2):93-105
references.pmid: 4777309
references.citation: Biochem J. 1972 Nov;130(2):453-65
references.pmid: 4664573
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1972 Jul 21;68(2):187-240
references.pmid: 5069789
references.citation: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972 Jun 28;47(6):1504-9
references.pmid: 5040245
references.citation: Nature. 1975 Jun 12;255(5509):530-3
references.pmid: 1095931
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Aug;73(8):2639-43
references.pmid: 1066673
references.citation: Nature. 1976 Jul 22;262(5566):325-6
references.pmid: 958384
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1976 May 15;103(2):227-49
references.pmid: 985660
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1969 Dec 14;46(2):269-79
references.pmid: 5360040