Numerical reconstruction of the quantal event at nicotinic synapses.
To test our present quantitative knowledge of nicotinic transmission, we reconstruct the postsynaptic conductance change that results after a presynaptic nerve terminal liberates a quantum of acetylcholine (ACh) into the synaptic cleft. The theory assumes that ACh appears suddenly in the cleft and that is subsequent fate is determined by radial diffusion, by enzymatic hydrolysis, and by binding to receptors. Each receptor has one channel and two ACh binding sites; the channel opens when both sites are occupied and the rate-limiting step id the binding and dissociation of the second ACh molecule. The calculations reproduce the experimentally measured growth phase (200 microseconds), peak number of open channels (2,000), and exponential decay phase. The time constant of the decay phase exceeds the channel duration by approximately equal to 20%. The normal event is highly localized: at the peak, two-thirds of the open channels are within an area of 0.15 micrometer 2. This represents 75% of the available channels within this area. The model also simulates voltage and temperature dependence and effects of inactivating esterase and receptors. The calculations show that in the absence of esterase, transmitter is buffered by binding to receptors and the postsynaptic response can be potentiated.
D000109:Acetylcholine / Q000378:metabolism; D000818:Animals; D007700:Kinetics; D008433:Mathematics; D008954:Models, Biological; D011789:Quantum Theory; D011950:Receptors, Cholinergic / Q000502:physiology*; D013569:Synapses / Q000502:physiology*
D011950:Receptors, Cholinergic; D000109:Acetylcholine
Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):727-8
4317321
Pflugers Arch. 1974 May 6;348(4):273-86
4546013
Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1975;43:103-218
891
Cell Tissue Res. 1974 Jun 24;149(4):437-55
4546545
Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1975;15:307-25
238463
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Oct;69(10):2762-6
4507600
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Sep;70(9):2473-6
4517659
Physiol Rev. 1976 Jan;56(1):177-247
174144
J Gen Physiol. 1977 Aug;70(2):187-219
894257
J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665-99
5071933
J Physiol. 1972 Jul;224(2):333-48
4341937
J Physiol. 1972 Jul;224(2):317-32
4341936
J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):173-97
5046143
J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):151-71
4537943
J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655-91
4543940
J Physiol. 1973 Jun;231(3):549-74
4361216
J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(2):467-95
167152
J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(2):385-407
806678
J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(2):427-63
171379
J Physiol. 1975 Sep;251(1):131-44
1185611
J Cell Biol. 1973 May;57(2):315-44
4348786
Mol Pharmacol. 1972 Nov;8(6):623-31
4344997
Int J Neurosci. 1972 Jul;4(1):1-10
4348843
Eur J Biochem. 1973 May 2;34(3):539-47
4736704
Eur J Biochem. 1969 Dec;11(3):441-55
4904700
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jun;72(6):2140-4
1079601
J Cell Biol. 1976 Apr;69(1):144-58
1254640
Biophys J. 1976 Jul;16(7):705-17
938714
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1958 Jan 1;148(930):38-56
13494474
J Physiol. 1978 Jun;279:197-213
307600
J Physiol. 1977 Aug;270(1):133-50
303289
Biophys J. 1979 May;26(2):263-89
262418
Biophys J. 1978 May;22(2):295-306
656546
Biophys J. 1978 Mar;21(3):181-94
630039