title: Comparative in vivo activities of cefsulodin, sulbenicillin, and gentamicin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
abstract: The in vivo activities of cefsulodin, sulbenicillin, and gentamicin were compared in mice infected intraperitoneally with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In mice infected with sulbenicillin- and gentamicin-susceptible strains, cefsulodin was about 12 to 60 times more active than sulbenicillin and had an activity similar to gentamicin. In mice, the activity of cefsulodin was independent whether the strains were resistant to gentamicin or not, but it was considerably affected by resistance of the strains to sulbenicillin.
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002511:Cephalosporins / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D005839:Gentamicins / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D051379:Mice; D010400:Penicillin G / Q000031:analogs & derivatives*; D010403:Penicillin Resistance; D011552:Pseudomonas Infections / Q000517:prevention & control*; D013408:Sulbenicillin / Q000627:therapeutic use*
chemical_list: D002511:Cephalosporins; D005839:Gentamicins; D013408:Sulbenicillin; D010400:Penicillin G
references.citation: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Mar;13(3):536-9
references.pmid: 122528
references.citation: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Jan;11(1):74-9
references.pmid: 836016
references.citation: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Feb;13(2):137-45
references.pmid: 417670
references.citation: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Oct;12(4):455-60
references.pmid: 921239
references.citation: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Mar;1(3):280-1
references.pmid: 4625628
references.citation: J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1972 Dec;25(12):695-708
references.pmid: 4568692
references.citation: J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1970 Nov;23(11):559-65
references.pmid: 4992170
references.citation: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Apr;9(4):595-9
references.pmid: 817661
references.citation: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Feb;9(2):262-73
references.pmid: 1046355
references.citation: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Jun;9(6):975-82
references.pmid: 938027
references.citation: Arch Otolaryngol. 1971 Jul;94(1):59-63
references.pmid: 5555873