title: Model for capping of membrane receptors based on boundary surface effects.
abstract: Crosslinking of membrane surface receptors may lead to their segregation into patches and then into a single large aggregate at one pole of the cell. This process is called capping. Here, a novel explanation of such a process is presented in which the membrane is viewed as a supersaturated solution of receptors in the lipid bilayer and the adjacent two aqueous layers. Without a crosslinking agent, a patch of receptors that is less than a certain size cannot stay in equilibrium with the solution and thus should dissolve. Patches greater than a certain size are stable and can, in principle, grow by the precipitation of the remaining dissolved receptors from the supersaturated solution. The task of the crosslinking molecules is to form such stable patches. These considerations are based on a qualitative thermodynamic calculation that takes into account the existence of a boundary tension in a patch (in analogy to the surface tension of a droplet). Thermodynamically, these systems should cap spontaneously after the patches have reached a certain size. But, in practice, such a process can be very slow. A suspension of patches may stay practically stable. The ways in which a cell may abolish this metastable equilibrium and thus achieve capping are considered and possible effects of capping inhibitors are discussed.
mesh_terms: D002462:Cell Membrane / Q000502:physiology*; D007152:Immunologic Capping; D008563:Membrane Lipids / Q000502:physiology; D008565:Membrane Proteins / Q000502:physiology*; D008954:Models, Biological; D011955:Receptors, Drug / Q000502:physiology*; D012995:Solubility; D013499:Surface Properties; D013500:Surface Tension; D013816:Thermodynamics
chemical_list: D008563:Membrane Lipids; D008565:Membrane Proteins; D011955:Receptors, Drug
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Nov;74(11):5031-5
references.pmid: 337308
references.citation: J Exp Med. 1977 May 1;145(5):1393-8
references.pmid: 323408
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1977 Jul 26;16(15):3476-83
references.pmid: 560860
references.citation: Nature. 1976 Oct 28;263(5580):781-3
references.pmid: 995192
references.citation: J Cell Sci. 1970 Sep;7(2):319-35
references.pmid: 4098863
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1975 Oct 21;14(21):4771-5
references.pmid: 1182116
references.citation: Science. 1972 Feb 18;175(4023):720-31
references.pmid: 4333397
references.citation: J Exp Med. 1972 Oct 1;136(4):885-906
references.pmid: 4626851
references.citation: Fed Proc. 1973 Jan;32(1):55-9
references.pmid: 4567777
references.citation: Eur J Immunol. 1972 Jun;2(3):203-12
references.pmid: 4569167
references.citation: J Cell Physiol. 1974 Jun;83(3):441-7
references.pmid: 4597237
references.citation: J Exp Med. 1973 Mar 1;137(3):675-89
references.pmid: 4540168
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2456-9
references.pmid: 4560687
references.citation: Eur J Immunol. 1972 Dec;2(6):523-35
references.pmid: 4654868
references.citation: Science. 1976 Apr 16;192(4236):218-26
references.pmid: 769162
references.citation: Nature. 1976 Mar 4;260(5546):21-3
references.pmid: 1264188
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Apr 13;457(1):57-108
references.pmid: 1260065