A study of the quality of duplicated radiographs.
The resolution, contrast, and clinical appearance of radiographs and duplicate radiographs made with two types of duplicating film were compared. Duplicating conditions evaluated were type and shape of light, light-film distance, type of exposure surface, and developer temperature. Major observations were as follows: both Kodak and DuPont films produced clinically acceptable duplicates; Kodak film was faster; DuPont film responded better in incandescent photoflood light than Kodak film; clear glass with appropriate light-film distance was the best exposure surface.
D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon / Q000379:methods; D003308:Copying Processes; D003748:Dental Equipment; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005453:Fluorescence; D008029:Lighting; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement; D011861:Radiography, Dental / Q000295:instrumentation; D013997:Time Factors; D014466:Ultraviolet Rays