Intracranial self-stimulation site specificity: the myth of current spread.
Locus-specificity of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) was determined for 78 electrode placements using monophasic stimulation. ICSS rate comparisons between each pole of a bipolar electrode when each served as cathode were made when the anodal source was either the other pole of the bipolar electrode or a skull screw. In hypothalamic areas, medial forebrain bundle electrode tips elicited significantly higher rates than electrode tips of the same bipolar electrodes located in perifornical or far-lateral diencephalic placements. In turn, perifornical electrode tips elicited higher rates than more dorsally or medially placed tips. In dorsal pontine areas, locus coeruleus electrode tips elicited significantly higher rates than more medially or laterally placed tips. In periaqueductal midbrain and substantia nigra placements, tips located along the midline or in the substantia nigra elicited significantly higher rates than tips located lateral to or ventral to those respective structures. Anodal locus did not change these results. These results suggest that ICSS behavior is delimited by and corresponds to neuroanatomically discrete entities and that cathodal, rather than anodal factors seem to most crucially determine ICSS integrity.
D000818:Animals; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D004594:Electrophysiology; D005071:Evoked Potentials; D007031:Hypothalamus / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008636:Mesencephalon / Q000502:physiology; D051381:Rats; D011919:Rats, Inbred Strains