title: A reply to "Validity and student acceptance of a graphoanalytic approach to personality" by Vestewig, Santee, and Moss.
abstract: Vestewig, Santee, and Moss have interpreted their 1976 study of graphoanalysis as wholly offensive to the validity of this system of personality assessment. But re-examination of their data reveals that some findings actually support the validity of graphoanalysis in spite of the fact that their methodology stacked the cards against the handwriting experts. Suggestions are made as to how this study could have been made comparable to those studies which show validity of handwriting analysis by the "global" or "holistic" method, and it is noted that under these conditions the results might have been quite different.
mesh_terms: D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006236:Handwriting; D006801:Humans; D010552:Personality Assessment; D011386:Projective Techniques; D011594:Psychometrics