Comparisons of the complement-fixation, indirect fluorescent antibody, and card agglutination tests for the diagnosis of bovine anaplasmosis.
Results of complement-fixation (CF), indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA), and card agglutination (CT) tests were statistically compared, using 380 serum samples obtained from 140 cattle which were disease-free or naturally or experimentally infected with Anaplasma marginale of Colombian origin. The IFA test was significantly the most sensitive for detection of amimals infected with anaplasmosis (97%); the CT test and the CF test were less so (84% and 79%, respectively). However, the most efficient test for identifying noninfected animals was the CF test (100%), and the CT and the IFA tests were less efficient (98% and 90%). A linear regression analysis performed on the average IFA and CF titers of 10 calves artificially infected with A marginale during a 20-week period showed significant regression coefficients for both tests. The regression line for the CF titers decreased below the sensitivity threshold at 14 weeks after calves were inoculated, whereas the regression line for the IFA titers continued above the sensitivity threshold 20 weeks after inoculation. The CT test also detected antibodies until the end of the observation period.
D000372:Agglutination Tests; D000712:Anaplasmosis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000276:immunology; D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D002418:Cattle Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000276:immunology; D003168:Complement Fixation Tests; D005455:Fluorescent Antibody Technique