Comparison of blind and non-blind assessments of occlusal sealant retention.
A comparison was made of scoring the retention status of BIS-GMA occlusal sealants 5 years after they had been placed, according to a non-blind and blind method of identification of teeth that had been sealed. Subjects were 175 children ages 15--18. One examiner made all the assessments. Retention of sealant was classified as all present, partly missing or all missing. There was 90.5% complete agreement between non-blind and blind examinations in scoring the retention status of 893 occlusal sites. Essentially no difference in agreement was found between sites on maxillary and mandibular teeth nor according to sites in specific teeth. There was only a slight tendency to classify more sites as having sealant present at the non-blind examinations than at the blind examinations, 56.7% and 55.1%, respectively. These findings would seem to indicate that whether examinations are done blindly or non-blindly is of minor importance in making an accurate assessment of sealant retention.
D000293:Adolescent; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D003764:Dental Materials; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D010895:Pit and Fissure Sealants
D003764:Dental Materials; D010895:Pit and Fissure Sealants