title: Low cost, manual drug use review of Medicaid recipients to screen prescriber and pharmacist performance.
abstract: A manual drug use review (DUR) methodology to screen outpatient prescribing which would meet the needs of large third-party programs that cannot afford elaborate computerized DUR was developed and pilot tested. A Medicaid drugs data base was used for the pilot test. A probability sample of 100 recipients over a three-month period was selected for the DUR. The drugs for each recipient, listed by their generic composition and amount, were recorded. Then a priori, explicit, screening criteria were developed for these generics. These criteria delineated drugs of choice, daily dose and refill patterns and, as appropriate, therapy length, drug holidays, and disease-drug and drug-drug interactions. Only 11% of recipients had prescribing patterns which passed all the screens. The most frequent screening failure was due to the prescribing of a drug which was not a drug of choice. In nearly all of the cases which failed the other screens, an alert pharmacist with patient records should have noticed these problems. An analysis showed that the initial start-up cost for the manual DUR was estimated at $1053 (not including personnel fringe benefits); for subsequent quarterly review, the cost was estimated to be about $530. The project showed that manual DUR can effectively and efficiently screen prescribing in a large third-party program.
mesh_terms: D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D004363:Drug Utilization; D008484:Medicaid / Q000458:organization & administration*; D014481:United States; D014600:Utilization Review / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*