Comparison of five information services as sources for bioavailability data.
The usefulness of five drug information services in obtaining bioavailability data from journal literature is compared. The deHAEN Drugs in Use system, the Iowa Drug Information Service (IDIS), Index Medicus, MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), each for a 10-year period, were searched for citations on bioavailability studies on the oral dosage forms of acetaminophen, lithium carbonate, phenytoin, nitrofurantoin and theophylline. Both quantity of references indexed and quality of data were considered. No significant difference was found in the mean value scores for the five services. Index Medicus provided 79 citations but required 7.7 hours of search time. MEDLINE yielded 62 citations but required only 1.1 hours to search. IPA, IDIS and deHaen had lower numbers of citations and intermediate search times. IPA, deHaen and Index Medicus all cited unique articles, with 11%, 7% and 3%, respectively. Index Medicus had the lowest percent of articles duplicated by two or more services (49%). The most comprehensive serch with the fewest duplicate citations would be obtained from searching deHaen's Drugs in Use, IPA and Index Medicus.
D001682:Biological Availability; D004346:Drug Information Services; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D007255:Information Services; D008523:MEDLARS; D014481:United States