[Results in the documentation for pregnancy surveillance].
Some results from the pregnancy surveillance booklet documentation are discussed in this paper. These results were gained on the basis of data from a representative random sample taken in Rheinland-Pfalz in 1977. Unfortunately, the risk factors section in the pregnancy surveillance booklet does not receive sufficient medical documentation. Apparently, its structure is too complex and its second part is not on the proper place. Contrary to the risk factor check list, which has been answered poorly, the entry of the observations on the course of the pregnancy obviously has carried out regularly. Only half of the pregnant women take advantage of at least 10 preventive medial examinations. Frequency of these examinations and date of the first medical examination in pregnancy depend on social conditions. In case of unfavourable general conditions pregnant women go less often, and later, to the prenatal examinations and the state of health of the new-born child depends on the "social strata" factor. Seen especially from the viewpoint of a greater centralization in obstetrics, the measures taken in prenatal care should be decentralized and varied and should include a revision of the pregnancy surveillance booklet.
D002662:Child Health Services; D005260:Female; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D011247:Pregnancy; D011295:Prenatal Care; D012306:Risk; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors
Ergebnisse aus der Dokumentation im Mutterpass.