Discrimination of stimulus aperiodicity as a function of temporal patterning: a discrepancy between psychophysical and sensory-neural assessments.
Tactile discrimination of stimulus aperiodicity was investigated in a two-alternative forced-choice task by having subjects report which of two successively presented trains of mechanical pulses, one with complete pulse periodicity and one in which a single pulse was temporally displaced from its regular placement, was temporally irregular or aperiodic. Trains contained three, four, or five pulses and were presented at interpulse intervals of 60, 75, 85, 100, 125, and 150 ms. Aperiodic trains had one pulse, other than the first or last pulse, temporally advanced or receded by 40% of the interstimulus interval. Results showed that: (i) although the percentage of correct reports of aperiodicity decreased as presentation rate increased (smaller interpulse intervals), the amount of decrease was a function of the number of pulses in a train; (ii) the discrimination of aperiodicity was dependent upon the specific location of the irregularity within the stimulus temporal pattern; and (iii) all patterns with complete temporal reversals of their successive interpulse intervals yielded nearly equivalently accurate reports of aperiodicity. These data suggest that central, attentional factors are involved in the discrimination of stimulus aperiodicity.
D004193:Discrimination Learning; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010812:Physical Stimulation; D011601:Psychophysics; D013998:Time Perception; D014110:Touch