Suppression of ventricular arrhythmias with intravenous disopyramide and lidocaine: efficacy comparison in a randomized trial.
Twenty-six patients with clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias were randomly assigned to treatment with either intravenous disopyramide or lidocaine; crossover to the other agent was permitted in nine cases of primary drug failure. In addition, disopyramide was administered nonrandomly to seven patients with ventricular arrhythmias not controlled by lidocaine in standard doses. Arrhythmia control (greater than 50 percent reduction of premature ventricular complexes) was achieved in all 22 trials with disopyramide and in 9 of 13 trails with lidocaine in the random study, whereas clinical efficacy (arrhythmia control with absence of side effects) occurred respectively in 15 of 22, and 8 of 13 trials. In all 11 patients (7 nonrandom, 4 random) whose arrhythmia was not controlled with lidocaine the arrhythmia was controlled with disopyramide. Thus, the clinical efficacy of intravenous disopyramide ran parallel to that of lidocaine in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Furthermore, intravenous disopyramide was an effective alternative agent for patients with arrhythmia not controlled by lidocaine.
D000208:Acute Disease; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001145:Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Q000188:drug therapy*; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000175:diagnosis; D004206:Disopyramide / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000097:blood; D006801:Humans; D007275:Injections, Intravenous; D008012:Lidocaine / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000097:blood; D008875:Middle Aged; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000175:diagnosis; D011725:Pyridines / Q000008:administration & dosage*
D011725:Pyridines; D008012:Lidocaine; D004206:Disopyramide