Pilot performance during simulated approaches and landings made with various computer-generated visual glidepath indicators.
Two simulator experiments were conducted to quantify the effectiveness, in terms of pilot performance, of four different visual glidepath indicator systems (the 2-bar VASI, 3-bar VASI, T-VASIS, and PAPI) in the severely reduced nighttime visual environment often referred to as the "black hole." Performance in Experiment I was best with the T-VASIS and decreased with the 3-bar BASI, PAPI, and 2-bar VASI, in that order; but differences between the T-VASIS, 3-bar VASI, and Papi were not statistically significant. Approaches flown withou the ground-vased glidepath indicators tended to be low and extremely variable. Observing behavior was compared in approaches with the T-VASIS and 2-bar VASI. Observing response frequency increased as distance from runway threshold decreased and was significantly higher with the T-VASIS. Differences in performanange provided by a given system and to the rate of observing the indicator during approaches.
D000337:Aerospace Medicine; D003201:Computers; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014796:Visual Perception