title: Can drinking water standards be reliably derived from industrial TLVs?
abstract: The accuracy of TLV derived drinking water standards is evaluated. When using the identical TLV conversion methodology which Stokinger and Woodward (1) used in deriving the standard for barium in drinking water, standards for arsenic, cadmium, chromium and lead offer 6, 200, 60, and 10 times less protection than the present drinking water standards, respectively. However, using the same methodology, the TLV derived drinking water standard for fluoride offers greater protection than the present standard by a factor of approximately 2. Thus, the use of the TLV conversion factor should be viewed in as one of many lines of potential evidence which should be reviewed in the standard derivation process - but it should not, if at all possible, be considered alone - as in the case of barium.
mesh_terms: D001151:Arsenic / Q000032:analysis; D001464:Barium / Q000032:analysis; D002104:Cadmium / Q000032:analysis; D002857:Chromium / Q000032:analysis; D004781:Environmental Exposure; D005459:Fluorides / Q000032:analysis; D007854:Lead / Q000032:analysis; D008452:Maximum Allowable Concentration; D014881:Water Supply / Q000032:analysis / Q000592:standards*
chemical_list: D002104:Cadmium; D002857:Chromium; D001464:Barium; D007854:Lead; D001151:Arsenic; D005459:Fluorides