title: [Is the term "blockage" just? (author's transl)].
abstract: The word "blockage" appeared the last ten years. It designs altogether a syndrom, a symptom and a pathogenic theory of squint. This term is analysed and discussed. The definitions, more or less precise, vary with the authors. The clinical signs attributed to the blockage are, in fact, due to the importance of the deviation. The electro-oculographic semeiology derives also partially of the magnitude of the angle of strabismus. The notion of a hypothetical nystagmus does not help for the understanding of the pathogenis of squint. The "faden operation", difficult and therefore dangerous in some hands, is perhaps an acquisition for the treatment of peculiar cases of nystagmus or paralysis. It would have been possible to expose the facts clearly by using only the terms of spasm and contracture. The confusion brought by the term of "blockage" is perhaps counterbalanced by the development of researches on the surgery of the arc of contact and on electro-oculography.
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D004585:Electrooculography; D004948:Esotropia / Q000209:etiology* / Q000601:surgery; D005133:Eye Movements; D006801:Humans; D009759:Nystagmus, Pathologic / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D009886:Ophthalmoplegia / Q000150:complications* / Q000601:surgery; D013285:Strabismus / Q000209:etiology*
vernacular_title: Le "blocage" existe-t-il?