Learning when reward is delayed: a marking hypothesis.
Rats were trained on spatial discriminations in which reward was delayed for 1 min. Experiment 1 tested Lett's hypothesis that responses made in the home cage during the delay interval are less likely to interfere with learning than responses made in the maze. Experimental subjects were transferred to their home cages during the delay interval, and control subjects were picked up but then immediately replaced in the maze. Contrary to Lett's hypothesis, both groups learned. Further experiments suggested that handling following a choice response was the crucial variable in producing learning: No learning occurred when handling was delayed (Experiment 2) or omitted (Experiment 3). One possible explanation for the fact that handling facilitated learning is that it served to mark the preceding choice response in memory so that subjects were then more likely to recall it when subsequently reinforced. In accordance with this interpretation, learning was found to be just as strong when the choice response was followed by an intense light or noise as by handling (Experiment 4). The implication of marking for other phenomena such as avoidance, quasi-reinforcement, and the paradoxical effects of punishment is also discussed.
D000818:Animals; D001143:Arousal; D001245:Association Learning; D002755:Choice Behavior; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005260:Female; D006234:Handling, Psychological; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation; D051381:Rats; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule; D013028:Space Perception; D014163:Transfer, Psychology