title: The mechanisms underlying attributive projection.
abstract: The experiment investigated the validity of the cognitive dissonance reduction and stimulus generalization explanations of attributive projection. Subjects in a high dissonance condition were informed that they possessed considerable hostility (a negative trait), while those in a low dissonance condition were told that they possessed a great deal of assertiveness (a desirable trait). The dissonance mechanism received support in that (a) subjects' reports of their anxiety indicated that an ego threat was produced only in the high dissonance condition, as expected; and (b) hostility was projected onto others to a significantly greater degree than was assertiveness. The existence of only a weak relationship between degree of ego threat produced by the personality feedback and subsequent amount of projection, however, throws into question the validity of the hypothesized defensive function of projection. No support for the generalization mechanism was obtained since the subjects did not project a greater amount of either trait onto the similar targets (college students) than onto the relatively dissimilar targets  (middle-aged lawyers); possible reasons for this negative result were discussed, as well as suggestions for future research.
mesh_terms: D001007:Anxiety / Q000523:psychology; D003073:Cognitive Dissonance; D004532:Ego; D005260:Female; D005795:Generalization, Stimulus; D006791:Hostility; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011385:Projection; D014705:Verbal Behavior