A comparative study of the effect of two time-alteration techniques on listener comprehension.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine if listener comprehension is differentially affected by two different techniques of time alteration: the sampling method and the harmonic compression method. The Nelson-Denny Reading Test, consisting of 8 selections of scientific and literary content appropriate for college students with respect to interest and level of difficulty, was presented to 3 groups of 40 Ss each; each group was given the tape-recorded test after processing at one of the 3 speech rates, normal, half normal, or twice normal rate. Of the 8 selections on this test, 4 were processed by sampling using a VARISPEECH-I compressor/expander, and 4 were processed by harmonic compression using a Lockheed LM-312 Pitch Normalizer. There were of course some differences in listener comprehension as a function of rate, but within each of the rate conditions there were no significant differences as a function of method of time alteration. With the type of speech material used here, and within these rate conditions, these time alteration methods can be used interchangeably in such research.
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D013065:Speech Intelligibility; D013997:Time Factors