title: Family interaction and communication deviance in disturbed and normal families. Questions of strategy: rejoinder to Jacob and Grounds.
abstract: Perhaps the best way to respond to Jacob and Grounds' critique is to focus on the more important issues they raise and to clarify some of the apparent confusion. It seems there are several general classes of criticism that Jacob and Grounds have offered: arbitrariness in selection of studies, inconsistency in reporting findings, inaccuracies in the data reported, and an overly favorable conclusion with respect to the communication deviance literature. Each of these issues will be dealt with here, using as many specific illustrations and examples as space permits.
mesh_terms: D000342:Affective Symptoms / Q000523:psychology*; D003142:Communication; D005190:Family; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D008425:Maternal Behavior; D012107:Research Design; D013597:Systems Analysis; D014705:Verbal Behavior