Gradients in analyzability.
A discussion of "Some Communicative Properties of the Bipersonal Field" by Robert Langs, M.D. In response to Dr. Langs' delineation of the bipersonal field concept and his clinical elaboration of a triad of disorders which are graded into classifications of descending analyzability: Types A,B, and C fields. I confirm his thesis and endeavor to demonstrate some underlying foundations of his categorical assumptions, namely the conceptions of projective identification, of the intactness of the background object of primary identification, the conception of a dual-track theory of infantile development in order to delineate the parallel between the separated self and the continuation of primary identification, and the postulation of manic and schizoid types of narcissistic character disorders (Types B and C respectively). All of these conceptions are vicissitudes of the varying ways in which patients confront the depressive position of separation-individuation with rapprochement and, thereby, conform to a gradient in which symbolization interpretations can be utilized in analytic treatment.
D003142:Communication; D006801:Humans; D007062:Identification, Psychological; D007207:Individuation; D009289:Narcissism; D009769:Object Attachment; D010551:Personality; D010554:Personality Disorders / Q000628:therapy; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D011385:Projection; D011572:Psychoanalysis; D011575:Psychoanalytic Therapy; D012043:Regression, Psychology; D014167:Transference, Psychology