Outpatient burns: a prospective study.
1) There is no significant difference in overall wound healing rates between non-antibacterial and antibacterial impregnated dressings used in this study. 2) The burn wound is not sterile. 3) Ease of dressing removal was similar during the first 7 days; thereafter the nitrofurazone dressings were more adherent; however, patient acceptance as subjectively evaluated at the time of dressing change and from the description of intervals between dressing changes did not vary significantly between the two dressings. 4) Pathogenic flora, both gram-positive and gram-negative, were significantly less prevalent in wounds treated with nitrofurazone dressings when the closed technique for burn treatment was utilized.
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001431:Bacteriological Techniques; D001458:Bandages; D002056:Burns / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000382:microbiology; D002057:Burns, Chemical / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000382:microbiology; D002058:Burns, Electric / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000382:microbiology; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009583:Nitrofurazone / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D010577:Petrolatum / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D014945:Wound Healing
D010577:Petrolatum; D009583:Nitrofurazone