title: Augmentation enterocystoplasty: a critical review.
abstract: Augmentation cystoplasty appears to offer a successful long-term solution for patients with small contracted bladders of almost any etiology. If proper indications are observed the procedure is well tolerated. With refined urodynamic diagnostic techniques our over-all failure rate of 35 per cent can be expected to decrease. Contraindications of the procedure include azotemia (creatinine clearance less than 40 cc per minute), vesical malignancy, neurogenic bladder with spastic pelvic floor (that cannot be modified) and young boys (mucus problems). In addition, patients with a strong psychiatric history should be approached with caution. The non-functional contracted bladder in which the cause of prior diversion is unclear or was performed because of an apparent outflow obstruction that spontaneously has been corrected by rest during the period of supravesical diversion also should be approached with care.
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002432:Cecum / Q000601:surgery; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D012809:Colon, Sigmoid / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007082:Ileum / Q000601:surgery; D007422:Intestines / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D014547:Urinary Diversion / Q000379:methods