[Oedipus tragedy].
Taking into account Paul Ricoeur's theories, two possible hermeneutical positions in front of Oedipus' drama are considered. One is to view it as a fatalistic destiny, bred into the darkest incestuous trends any infant is fighting against, and leading to unavoidable stigmata of everlasting nature. The other is to conceive it as the response to present naked truth, resulting from deep reflexion in order to attain real consciousness of oneself. The former is the "backwards conception", having its own limitations, in its very being buried into the past. The latter, having its projections forward, centers on anguish and anxiety aroused by consciousness of oneself, seeked by the alert responsible mind, able to afford reality and truth with all their thorough implications. The author's existential position embraces the secon conception which had been already exposed by Sophocles in Oedipus in Colonna. The dialectics are set between seeing and knowing. Tiresias is blind, but he can see, because he can afford truth, and its consequence, guilt. Oedipus must fight to attain the possibility of knowing, and must go into the ordeal of losing his eyes, as the only way to reach true self realization, through facing truth and bearing anguish.
D006801:Humans; D009813:Oedipus Complex; D011574:Psychoanalytic Theory
La tragedia de Edipo