title: Is a moral consensus in medical ethics possible?
abstract: At the moment in Britain and elsewhere the debate inside and outside of Parliament on various medical issues which are essentially moral never ends. Everybody has his own point of view--or principles. But what emerges for society to adopt can often be called in lay terminology 'compromise'. Professor Mitchell argues in this paper that a moral consensus is possible and indeed ought to be achieved, as today the medical practitioner can no longer make his decision only in accordance with the strict code of ethics of the medical profession. The task of the philosopher, says Professor Mitchell, is to interpret the actions and attitudes demanded by modern medical practice.
mesh_terms: D000029:Abortion, Legal; D033421:Beginning of Human Life; D035843:Biomedical Research; D003276:Contraceptives, Oral; D030881:Disclosure; D028663:Ethical Theory; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005065:Euthanasia; D019369:Life; D008603:Mental Health; D009014:Morals; D028723:Personhood; D012945:Social Values
chemical_list: D003276:Contraceptives, Oral