[Intra-epithelial carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Our experience with treatment, the role of conization].
The authors re-emphasize that the sure diagnosis of carcinoma of the cervix depends on histology; having considered a series of 15,000 smears in an article on cytological screening for carcinoma of the cervix. They show that the main prop of this histological examination should definitely be conisation. They furthermore prepare an inventory of the different possible methods of treatment of intra-epithelial carcinoma, stating for each method the advantages and disadvantages of the method. Their attitude to treatment is conservative, and they believe that conisation in every case is sufficient when complete removal of the in situ lesion is carried out whatever the age of the patient is. They state the limits of this method and define clearly the contra-indications for such a scheme of treatment, which can only be carried out routinely with the absolutely necessary cooperation of a cytology laboratory and faultless histology.
D000328:Adult; D002278:Carcinoma in Situ / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D002584:Cervix Uteri / Q000473:pathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008722:Methods; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*
Le carcinome intra-épithélial du col utérin. Notre expérience du traitement, le rôle de la conisation