An evaluation of "informed consent" with volunteer prisoner subjects.
"Informed consent" sets a goal for investigators experimenting with human subjects, but little is known about how to achieve or evaluate it in an experiment. In a 3-year, double-blind study with incarcerated men, we attempted to provide a "free and informed consent" and evaluated our efforts with an unannounced questionnaire administered to subjects after they completed the experiment. At that time, approximately two-thirds had sufficient information for an informed consent, but only one-third was well informed about all key aspects of the experiment and one-third was insufficiently informed to give an informed consent. We found that institution- or study-based coercion was minimal in our experiment. From our evaluation of the questionnaire and experience at the study institution, we conclude that an experiment with human subjects should be designed to include an ongoing evaluation of informed consent, and active attempts should be made to avoid or minimize coercive inducements. Experiments with significant risk, which require a long duration and/or large sample size relative to the institution's population, should probably not be performed on prisoner subjects. The experimenter should be independent of the penal institution's power structure. Presenting and explaining a consent form to volunteers on one occasion is probably an in adequate procedure for obtaining and maintaining an informed consent.
D000374:Aggression / Q000187:drug effects; D035841:Behavioral Research; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006805:Human Experimentation; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D008094:Lithium / Q000494:pharmacology; D009042:Motivation; D011329:Prisoners; D035842:Research Subjects; D018570:Risk Assessment; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
D008094:Lithium