Comparison of results for morphine urinalyses by radioimmunoassay and thin-layer chromatography in a narcotic clinic setting.
Radioimmunoassay (RIA) and thin-layer chromatography (TLC) were compared for morphine detection in an actual narcotic clinic setting. A choice of urines from all those screened by TLC allowed a critical comparison as to actual use or non-use of narcotic drugs, rather than a sampling at random in which the question of possible false positives or negatives cannot be conclusively answered. Although RIA is more sensitive than TLC, its advantage is apparent only in those cases where urine specimens are difficult to obtain frequently regularly or where the use of morphine is suspected by the positive identification of quinine in urine that was morphine-negative by TLC. In a selected group of negative and positive specimens chosen without conscious bias, the two methods gave consistently similar results, indicating that the modified TLC method provided a few or no false positives or negatives if the negatives were from those cases that were not positive anytime up to 3-4 days before urine collection. We conclude that RIA can be of significant value as a supplement to a TLC screening program, without sacrificing the many advantages that TLC has to offer.
D002855:Chromatography, Thin Layer; D003951:Diagnostic Errors; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D008722:Methods; D009020:Morphine / Q000652:urine*; D009021:Morphine Dependence / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000652:urine; D009270:Naloxone / Q000627:therapeutic use; D011803:Quinine / Q000652:urine; D011863:Radioimmunoassay; D013997:Time Factors
D009270:Naloxone; D009020:Morphine; D011803:Quinine