On "an experimental evaluation of sensorimotor patterning": a critique.
A critique was presented of a study by Neman, Roos, McCann, Menolascino, and Heal (1975) in which a sensorimotor training method of treatment for retarded children was evaluated. They presented evidence which they interpreted as support for the effectiveness of this treatment method in benefiting their sample of retarded individuals. Many shortcomings of the Neman et al. study were pointed out in the areas of evaluating the theoretical rationale underlying the treatment, subject selection, procedure, statistical analyses, and interpretation of the findings. In addition, the problems raised by the premature release of the findings to the press were discussed. Special note was made of the potential harmful effects of this publicity on retarded children and their families. The important role and responsibility of the National Association for Retarded Citizens in endorsing and recommending treatment methods for retarded individuals was also discussed.
D000293:Adolescent; D001288:Attention; D002648:Child; D002674:Child, Institutionalized; D004495:Education of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities; D005260:Female; D006167:Guilt; D006801:Humans; D008607:Intellectual Disability / Q000534:rehabilitation; D007360:Intelligence; D007804:Language Development; D008297:Male; D009048:Motor Skills; D009938:Organizations; D010290:Parents; D010806:Physical Education and Training; D012107:Research Design; D012737:Sex Factors; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D014481:United States