Components of "authority" as determinants of compliance.
This study investigated factors affecting compliance, to orders from a formal authority. The design created a two-level status hierarchy in which subjects occupied identical low-status positions and responded to demands from a simulated high-status leader. Four components of authority-normativity,coervice power, collective justification, and success-failure-were manipulated as independent variables. Another component, the endorsement accorded the leader, was included in the design as a measured variable. Results indicated that compliance increased significantly when coervice power was high (rather than low), when justification was collective (rather than partisan), and when demands were normative (rather than counternormative). Contary ti the theoretical expectation, endorsement did not affect compliance by low-status members. The findings show that the normative aspect of legitimacy serves as a compliance-gaining base even when stripped of enforcing sanctions and under-lying goals and that the distinction between normativity and endorsement is valid for research on social power.
D000124:Achievement; D001318:Authoritarianism; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D006040:Goals; D006126:Group Processes; D006608:Hierarchy, Social; D006801:Humans; D007857:Leadership; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D012930:Social Dominance