title: Is open prostatectomy really obsolete?
abstract: A total of 1,066 prostatectomies treated by us from 1985 to 1989 were reviewed. The necessary comprehensive data were available on 710 cases. Open (Millin's retropubic) prostatectomy (RPP) was the procedure of choice for large glands and transurethral resection (TURP) for smaller glands: 408 had had RPP and 262 TURP; 14.5 percent of the TURP group eventually needed a second procedure during a one to six-year follow-up compared with only 2.6 percent of the RPP group. Forty other patients who had been operated on elsewhere were referred to us for a second, repeat procedure; 30 also previously had had a TURP. Total hospitalization, operating time, and complications were better in the long run in the RPP group compared with the TURP group. It is believed that open prostatectomy still has a respectable place in urology and therefore, should be considered and also taught to residents for use in dealing with large glands.
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D011292:Premedication; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011470:Prostatic Hyperplasia / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000601:surgery; D012086:Reoperation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012189:Retrospective Studies