title: [Endo-surgical dissection of the upper urinary tract through the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal route: an experimental study with pigs and cadavers].
abstract: In order to define the best method for endosurgical dissection of the upper urinary tract, an experimental study comparing the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches was performed. Between September 1991 and February 1992, 15 female pigs and 8 human cadavres underwent endosurgical dissection of the upper urinary tract. The retroperitoneal approach was used in 8 pigs and 5 cadavres. In the lateral supine position, the retroperitoneum was insufflated at the lower pole of the kidney, via a 2 cm cutaneo-muscular incision, followed by a blind dissection with the finger to create a space in the retroperitoneal fat. Four trocars were inserted into the retroperitoneal space allowing dissection of the ureter, kidney and its vascular pedicle. The renal vessels and the ureter were then clipped or stapled with the endo-GIA then sectioned. The operation was successfully performed in all of the pigs with a mean operating time of 2 hours. Complications were limited to two peritoneal effractions. Retroperitoneal endosurgical dissection was much longer and more difficult to perform on the cadavre (mean operating time: 3 hours). Satisfactory retropneumoperitoneum was never able to be obtained due to the large amount of retroperitoneal fat and the proximity of the twelfth rib and posterior iliac crest interfered with the insertion of the trocars and made dissection more difficult. The transperitoneal approach was performed in 7 pigs and three cadavres. In the lateral supine position, after creating pneumoperitoneum using a Veress needle, 4 trocars were inserted into the peritoneal cavity. Toldt's fascia was gripped and incised allowing retraction of the colon towards the midline, thereby exposing the renal region. The ureter and the renal vessels were dissected. The renal artery and vein were then clipped or stapled with the endo-GIA then sectioned, while the ureter was clipped and sectioned. The complications of the transperitoneal route were: an injury to the small intestine during insertion of a trocar and haemorrhage due to accidental section of a lower pole renal artery, which was able to be controlled by application of clips. In the pig, the transperitoneal approach was as simple to perform as the retroperitoneal approach and the mean operating time was the same (two hours).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
authors.affiliation: Clinique Urologique, Hôpital Bichat, Paris.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Anidjar
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Delmas
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Villers
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Blanc
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Boccon-Gibod
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Corring
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002102:Cadaver; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007668:Kidney / Q000601:surgery*; D010537:Peritoneum; D013514:Surgical Procedures, Operative / Q000379:methods; D013552:Swine; D014513:Ureter / Q000601:surgery*
vernacular_title: Dissection endo-chirurgicale du haut appareil urinaire par voie rétropéritonéale et transpéritonéale: une étude expérimentale chez le cochon et chez le cadavre.