title: Expert psychiatric evidence in sexual misconduct cases before state medical boards.
abstract: The growing problem of physician sexual misconduct has captured the attention not only of the medical and legal communities, but of the public as well. State medical boards, administrative agencies with generous rules of evidence and varying levels of expertise, face the difficult task of responding to patients' allegations of physician sexual abuse. This Article, based in large part on the author's survey of current state medical board practice, reveals an increasing reliance on expert psychiatric testimony to explain the behavior of complainants and accused physicians. Drawing analogies from the use of psychiatric evidence in child sexual abuse cases, the author examines the factors that boards must consider in determining the admissibility of expert testimony in physician sexual misconduct cases, and calls upon states to establish clear evidentiary rules to govern the use of such testimony in administrative hearings.
authors.forename: A L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Hyams
mesh_terms: D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D016365:Liability, Legal; D008007:Licensure, Medical / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010820:Physicians / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011364:Professional Practice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011570:Psychiatry / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D011902:Rape / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017406:Sexual Harassment / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States