Pushing the environmental regulatory focus a step back: controlling the introduction of new chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
Environmental destruction and its attendant effects on the animal world, including human beings, has moved to the forefront of United States and worldwide policy. The effect of this deterioration on human health is unclear. Much debate focuses on the cases of cancer, along with other diseases, that are environmentally induced. Congress has responded with various environmental laws. These laws focus primarily on controlling chemicals placed into the environment, largely by industry. This Note proposes that such a singular focus is inadequate and ultimately costly. A more sensible and efficient strategy to environmental protection places emphasis on controlling inputs to the productive process before the need arises to contain such substances. The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 ("TSCA") takes this approach. This Note reviews the means by which TSCA attempted to accomplish its goals and concludes that TSCA's implementation has largely been ineffective. The Note then discusses three possible explanations for TSCA's failure. Finally, the Note proposes how TSCA might be made more effective in regulating new chemicals.
Hanan
A
A
Boston University.
D000397:Air Pollution / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000517:prevention & control; D004782:Environmental Health / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D015386:Hazardous Substances; D006292:Health Priorities; D007255:Information Services; D014481:United States; D014484:United States Environmental Protection Agency; D014876:Water Pollution / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000517:prevention & control
D015386:Hazardous Substances