title: [A comparative evaluation of myocardial protection based on criteria not associated with the quality of myocardial conservation].
abstract: Based on the rich clinical material (405 patients), the authors have assessed the most common blood and crystalloid cardioplegic techniques by applying the criteria which do not apply to those of myocardial protection adequacy. Differences have been found between the methods in the volumes of blood loss, the number of patients operated on without utilizing donor blood, terms of aortic occlusion at one-stage operative interventions, recovery of cardiac performance after aortic occlusion. The differences found are essential in choosing the type of cardioplegia by taking into account the individual traits of each surgical intervention and an operating surgeon's opinions.
authors.forename: M Iu
authors.initials: MIu
authors.lastname: Malyshev
authors.forename: D A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Borovikov
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002314:Cardioplegic Solutions / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002315:Cardiopulmonary Bypass; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015428:Myocardial Reperfusion Injury / Q000517:prevention & control*
chemical_list: D002314:Cardioplegic Solutions
vernacular_title: Sravnitel'naia otsenka metodov miokardial'noĭ zashchity na osnove kriteriev, ne sviazannykh s kachestvom sokhraneniia miokarda.