Computed tomography and ultrasonography in submandibular tumours.
The value of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) for assessing submandibular tumours has been assessed. Thirty-five patients with 23 benign submandibular gland tumours and 12 malignant tumours have been investigated. In 33/35 patients, 18 plain CT (PCT), 19 CT sialography (CTS), and eight intravenous contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) procedures were performed. PCT did not allow clear delineation of 78% of the lesions, due to the similar density of the tumour and normal submandibular gland parenchyma. The tumours were easily recognized as low-echogenic or low-density masses by US, CTS and CECT. Benign lesions were usually sharply demarcated and had smooth borders on US, CTS and CECT. In addition, lobulation was often recognized in pleomorphic adenomas. Malignant tumours were poorly defined with irregular borders in 11/12 cases on US, CTS and CECT. CECT was superior to PCT and CTS in providing images of the tumour and its involvement of adjacent structures. It was concluded that US is the most useful primary examination method for submandibular tumours, while CECT provides the best evaluation of extension to the surrounding structures and/or adjacent lymph nodes. CTS seems to be unnecessary, if a submandibular tumour can be visualized by US and CECT.
Yasumoto
M
M
Department of Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.
Shibuya
H
H
Suzuki
S
S
Ishii
J
J
Amagasa
T
T
Ida
M
M
Okada
N
N
D008949:Adenoma, Pleomorphic / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D013365:Submandibular Gland Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D014463:Ultrasonography