Fairness and feasibility in national health care systems.
The issue of National Health Care reform has been discussed from many different perspectives. One of the most fundamental justifications for such reform is based on the notion of horizontal equity. The motivation for equity in medical services use contrasts with the seeming lack of concern for equity in financing. Proposed policy remedies often involve transfers through taxation, though the effects of government taxation often reduce the efficiency of publicly financed health insurance. Further, the effects of heterogeneous preferences complicate the assessment of optimal medical service consumption levels. Ethical justification aside, this paper addresses the notion of fairness in the provision of medical care from an economic perspective. It suggests policies which might be most suitable in achieving such a goal. A paradoxical result of these considerations of fairness is that unequal insurance coverage is requisite to ensure more equal utilization of medical services by the population. The concept of fairness is then developed into a bottom up system of equity in the medical market.
Pauly
M V
MV
Wharton School, Philadelphia.
D002170:Canada; D003363:Cost Control; D004465:Economic Competition; D005380:Financing, Government / Q000379:methods; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000191:economics* / Q000592:standards; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000191:economics* / Q000592:standards; D009310:National Health Insurance, United States / Q000592:standards*; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000191:economics* / Q000592:standards; D012935:Social Justice; D013660:Taxes; D014481:United States