title: [The urethrocystogram and perineal sonography compared].
abstract: Perineal sonography and urethrocystography were performed on 45 patients in the same sitting to evaluate the sonographical method with regard to its applicability as a routine examination method. Corresponding results were obtained 14 times (= 30%). In 31 patients (= 70%) urethrocystographic and ultrasonic measurements diverged. The urethrocystogram must therefore remain an integral part in the work-up of urinary incontinence.
authors.affiliation: Universitätsklinik für Radiodiagnostik, Universität Wien.
authors.forename: M E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Ammann
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Winkelbauer
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Fitzal
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007451:Iodamide; D007459:Iodized Oil; D008875:Middle Aged; D010502:Perineum; D011187:Posture; D011859:Radiography; D014463:Ultrasonography; D014521:Urethra / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D001743:Urinary Bladder / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D014546:Urinary Catheterization; D014549:Urinary Incontinence / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging
chemical_list: D007451:Iodamide; D007459:Iodized Oil
vernacular_title: Urethrozystogramm und Perinealsonographie im Vergleich.