General dental practitioners' evaluation of the need for extraction of asymptomatic mandibular third molars.
Thirty general dental practitioners were asked to evaluate the need for extraction of asymptomatic mandibular third molars. Thirty-six mandibular third molars with equal distribution of angular positions, impaction status, males and females and age groups were selected. To estimate the consistency of the evaluation, the 36 cases were duplicated so that, in all, 72 teeth were evaluated. The number of molars proposed to be extracted by the observers varied from 0 to 26. There was no third molar which all observers agreed should be extracted. The two molars which most observers, 25 and 23 of altogether 30 observers, proposed to be extracted were partially covered by soft tissue. The decision not to extract two molars was unanimous. Both of these were completely covered by bone tissue and positioned vertically. The mean overall intra-observer agreement for the therapeutical decision was 92%, with a range of 69-100%. The length of professional experience of the observer did not influence the evaluation whether or not to extract. We conclude that there is a great variation among general dental practitioners regarding their evaluation on the need for removal of asymptomatic mandibular third molars.
Department of Oral Radiology, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden.
K
K
Knutsson
B
B
Brehmer
L
L
Lysell
M
M
Rohlin
D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D003657:Decision Making; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D005792:General Practice, Dental; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008334:Mandible; D008875:Middle Aged; D008964:Molar, Third / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D015588:Observer Variation; D011364:Professional Practice; D013997:Time Factors; D014081:Tooth Extraction; D014095:Tooth, Impacted / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*