Analgesia from the periaqueductal gray in the developing rat: focal injections of morphine or glutamate and effects of intrathecal injection of methysergide or phentolamine.
The aim of these experiments was to examine the changes in antinociception elicited by morphine or glutamate stimulation of the periaqueductal gray of the midbrain (PAG) during the postnatal development of the rat. Pups, aged 3, 10, and 14 days, were implanted with cannulas aimed at either the dorsal or the ventral aspect of the PAG, and glutamate (vehicle, 60 mM or 180 mM) or morphine (vehicle, 2 micrograms or 6 micrograms) was microinjected into one of those two sites. Pups were tested for analgesia against noxious thermal and mechanical stimuli. Morphine produced analgesia at 3 and 10 days of age only when administered to the ventral part of the PAG and the thermal noxious stimulus was tested. Conversely, analgesia induced by glutamate was seen at 3 and 10 days of age only when glutamate was given to the dorsal aspect of the PAG and the mechanical stimulus was used. In 14-day-old pups, both drugs produced analgesia against both types of noxious stimuli regardless of their site of administration within the PAG. Systemically administered naloxone attenuated the analgesic effects of both drugs when they were administered to the ventral PAG, but did not consistently attenuate the analgesic effect of either compound given to the dorsal aspect of the PAG. When either morphine or glutamate was injected into the ventral PAG, intrathecal injections of methysergide attenuated analgesia against the thermal stimulus to a significantly greater degree than the mechanical stimulus and intraspinal injection of phentolamine attenuated analgesia against the mechanical stimulus more potently. When glutamate was given to the dorsal PAG, analgesia against both stimulus types was significantly attenuated. These results indicate that the morphine- and glutamate-induced analgesia mediated by the PAG are developmentally differentiated. These ontogenetic differences most likely reflect differences in the mechanism of action by which these drugs produce analgesia when administered to the PAG, as well as neuroanatomical differences within the dorsal and the ventral regions of the PAG.
Tive
L A
LA
Biopsychology Doctoral Program, City University of New York, New York.
Barr
G A
GA
D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology; D000698:Analgesia; D000818:Animals; D000831:Animals, Newborn; D002404:Catheterization; D018691:Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; D005971:Glutamates / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology*; D018698:Glutamic Acid; D006358:Hot Temperature; D007267:Injections; D007278:Injections, Spinal; D008784:Methysergide / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology*; D009020:Morphine / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000037:antagonists & inhibitors / Q000494:pharmacology*; D009270:Naloxone / Q000494:pharmacology; D010487:Periaqueductal Gray / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D010646:Phentolamine / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology*; D010812:Physical Stimulation; D051381:Rats
D018691:Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; D005971:Glutamates; D009270:Naloxone; D018698:Glutamic Acid; D009020:Morphine; D008784:Methysergide; D010646:Phentolamine