Atrial vulnerability and electrophysiology determined in patients with and without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
For elucidation of atrial electrophysiology and vulnerability an electrophysiological study was performed in 45 patients with documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and a control group (n = 46). Atrial vulnerability was assessed by programmed atrial stimulation with up to two extrastimuli during sinus rhythm and paced cycle lengths of 600 msec, 430 msec and 330 msec. Sustained atrial fibrillation or flutter was induced in 37/45 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in contrast to 9/46 patients in the control group (P less than 0.001). Left atrial diameter (M-mode echocardiogram), P wave duration, sinus cycle length, sinus node recovery time, and the effective refractory period of the right atrium were not significantly different between the two study groups. Intraatrial conduction time from the high right atrium (HRA) to the basal right atrium (A) and the functional refractory period of the right atrium were significantly longer in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Kühlkamp
V
V
Medizinische Klinik Abteilung III, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Federal Republic of Germany.
Haasis
R
R
Seipel
L
L
D001281:Atrial Fibrillation / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology*; D001282:Atrial Flutter / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology*; D016275:Atrial Function / Q000502:physiology*; D002304:Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; D004452:Echocardiography; D004562:Electrocardiography; D004594:Electrophysiology; D005260:Female; D006329:Heart Conduction System / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged