A meta-analysis of randomized trials of fish oil in prevention of restenosis following coronary angioplasty.
The efficacy of fish oil in decreasing restenosis following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) remains controversial despite seven published reports of randomized trials involving 951 patients. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether these trials, viewed in aggregate, demonstrate a significant benefit. We evaluated rates of restenosis two to 12 months after PTCA and calculated an estimate of the overall effect and 95% confidence interval (CI). The typical odds ratio (treatment versus control) was 0.71 (95% CI 0.54, 0.94), P = 0.016 (two-tailed). The data show a strong and highly significant (P less than .0001) relationship between daily fish oil dose and gastrointestinal side effects. While compatible with a small to moderate benefit of fish oil on rates of restenosis, these results require confirmation in a randomized clinical trial large enough to distinguish reliably between a clinically meaningful benefit and a null result.
O'Connor
G T
GT
Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Malenka
D J
DJ
Olmstead
E M
EM
Johnson
P S
PS
Hennekens
C H
CH
D015906:Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000628:therapy; D005260:Female; D005395:Fish Oils / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D008875:Middle Aged; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012008:Recurrence
D005395:Fish Oils