An evaluation of the Thermafil endodontic obturation technique.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Thermafil endodontic obturation technique and to compare it with laterally condensed gutta-percha. Thirty-seven maxillary central incisors were similarly prepared and divided into groups. Seventeen were obturated with Thermafil and 17 with lateral condensation. Three served as controls. After vacuum staining, all teeth were cleared and apical dye penetration was evaluated by two independent observers. Average leakage values were 0.24 mm and 1.32 mm for Thermafil and 0.47 mm and 1.18 mm for lateral condensation. There was no significant difference between the techniques, although a difference between evaluators was noted. Final results point to the relative subjectivity of in vitro leakage studies. When comparing the obturation times of both techniques, the Thermafil technique averaged 2 min 56 s while lateral condensation took 3 min 26 s. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in obturation times.
Scott
A C
AC
Vire
D E
DE
Swanson
R
R
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003763:Dental Leakage / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006171:Gutta-Percha; D006801:Humans; D007180:Incisor; D008437:Maxilla; D012389:Root Canal Obturation / Q000379:methods*
D006171:Gutta-Percha