Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with chemical or mechanical retention.
The study was undertaken to measure and compare the shear bond strengths of a ceramic bracket with chemical retention, a ceramic bracket with a new type of textured base providing mechanical retention, and a metal bracket with foil-mesh base. The tests were performed on 51 extracted human premolars which were randomly divided into three equally large groups (n = 17)--one group for each type of bracket. After debonding, the site of failure was noted and the enamel surface inspected with scanning electron microscopy. The ceramic bracket with chemical retention exhibited significantly higher bond strength than the corresponding bracket with textured base. In comparison with the metal bracket significantly higher bond strengths were recorded for both types of ceramic brackets. The ceramic bracket with mechanical retention and the metal bracket were comparable as regards the site of bond failure. In some cases the chemical bond provided very high values of bond strength. Enamel failure were recorded in three teeth which had been bonded with this type of ceramic bracket.
Forsberg
C M
CM
Department of Orthodontics, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Hagberg
C
C
D000134:Acid Etching, Dental; D000269:Adhesives / Q000737:chemistry; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate / Q000737:chemistry; D002516:Ceramics / Q000737:chemistry*; D002710:Chlorhexidine / Q000737:chemistry; D001840:Dental Bonding / Q000379:methods; D003743:Dental Enamel / Q000648:ultrastructure; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D006801:Humans; D016910:Orthodontic Brackets; D012821:Silanes / Q000737:chemistry; D013193:Stainless Steel / Q000737:chemistry; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013499:Surface Properties
D000269:Adhesives; D012821:Silanes; D013193:Stainless Steel; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; D002710:Chlorhexidine