Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. Part 2. The influence of bonding systems.
Acid-etching and bonding of composite resin to bevelled enamel margins has been reported to produce a reliable seal. However, achieving a seal with dentine and cementum margins is more difficult. Four different dentine bonding systems were used in combination with Silux composite resin to restore cervical cavities in vitro. None of the bonding systems used completely sealed either the occlusal or gingival margins. Of the four systems, GLUMA provided the best seal at both the occlusal and gingival margins.
Martin
F E
FE
Department of Operative Dentistry, University of Sydney.
Kingsford Smith
E D
ED
Andrews
N
N
D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; D003188:Composite Resins; D001840:Dental Bonding / Q000379:methods*; D003738:Dental Cements; D003739:Dental Cementum; D003763:Dental Leakage / Q000517:prevention & control*; D003804:Dentin; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D005976:Glutaral; D006801:Humans; D008689:Methacrylates; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids; D019279:Resin Cements
D003188:Composite Resins; D003738:Dental Cements; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D008689:Methacrylates; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids; D019279:Resin Cements; C067788:scotchbond 2; C074811:Tenure adhesive; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; C041330:Scotchbond; C044372:Gluma; D005976:Glutaral