Use of informed consent with therapeutic paradox.
Debate persists in the literature and among clinicians about the ethical appropriateness of paradoxical interventions. It has been suggested that informed consent with therapeutic paradox would alleviate ethical concerns of deception, manipulation, harm to the client, and withholding of information from the client in therapy. The purpose of this study was to explore health care consumer reactions to the benefits and risks of therapeutic paradox as stated in a consent for treatment form. The study explored the responses of 32 medical patients to a hypothetical consent for treatment form for therapeutic paradox. Data were collected in a brief semistructured interview after subjects read the hypothetical consent form. Utilizing a case study, the investigator then offered an example of a successful paradoxical intervention and additional subject comments were solicited. Content analysis of the responses was made. Health care consumers had mixed responses to the consent form. While the consent form served as an obstacle for some consumers, many were willing to sign the consent form and accept treatment even though they had internal reservations and questions. Appropriateness of the consent form format is discussed.
Farkas
M M
MM
D000328:Adult; D001294:Attitude to Health; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D032962:Consent Forms; D030881:Disclosure; D004993:Ethics, Nursing; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D008297:Male; D011568:Psychiatric Nursing / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D018570:Risk Assessment; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires