Modelling magnetic coil excitation of human cerebral cortex with a peripheral nerve immersed in a brain-shaped volume conductor: the significance of fiber bending in excitation.
To help elucidate some basic principles of magnetic coil (MC) excitation of cerebral cortex, a model system was devised in which mammalian phrenic nerve, or amphibian sciatic nerve with its branches was suspended in appropriate Ringer's solution in a human brain-shaped volume conductor, an inverted plastic skull. The nerve was recorded monophasically out of the volume conductor. The site of nerve excitation by the MC was identified by finding where along the nerve a bipolar electrical stimulus yielded a similar action potential latency. MC excitation of hand-related corticospinal (CT) neurons was modelled by giving the distal end of nerve attached to the lateral skull an initial radial (perpendicular) trajectory, with subsequent bends towards the base and posterior part of the skull; this nerve was optimally excited by a laterally placed figure 8 or round MC when the induced electric field led to outward membrane current at the initial bend. By contrast, nerve given a trajectory modelling CT neurons related to the foot was optimally excited when the coil windings were across the midline, but again when membrane current flowed outward at the first bend. Corticocortical fibers were modelled by placing the nerve in the anteroposterior axis lateral to the midline; with the round MC vertex-tangentially orientated, optimal excitation occurred at the bend nearest the interaural line, i.e., near the peak electric field. The findings emphasize the importance of orientation and direction of current in the MC and fiber bends in determining nerve excitation. The findings in the peripheral nerve-skull model help explain (1) why lateral and vertex-tangentially orientated MCs preferentially excite arm-related CT neurons directly and indirectly (through corticocortical fibers), respectively, and (2) why the MC orientations for optimally exciting directly arm and leg-related CT neurons differ.
Amassian
V E
VE
Department of Physiology, State Univesity of New York, Brookly 11203.
Eberle
L
L
Maccabee
P J
PJ
Cracco
R Q
RQ
D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D002024:Bufo marinus; D002415:Cats; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D004576:Electromyography; D006801:Humans; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D008251:Macaca; D008280:Magnetics; D008959:Models, Neurological; D008961:Models, Structural; D009132:Muscles / Q000502:physiology; D010525:Peripheral Nerves / Q000502:physiology*; D011892:Rana catesbeiana