title: Evaluation of resins for provisional restorations.
abstract: An in vivo study of two resin materials (Barricaid and Caulk Temporary Crown and Bridge Resin) was done to determine the retention, post-operative sensitivity, and fabrication time of provisional restorations made from these materials. Following the placement of these resins in 67 intracoronal cavity preparations of 19 adult patients, a baseline evaluation was made which included a clinical examination and color slides. Twenty-four hours after the temporary restorations were placed, the patients completed evaluations of the post-operative sensitivity experienced. There was no difference in post-operative sensitivity between the teeth restored with Barricaid or Caulk Temporary Crown and Bridge Resin. At the insertion appointment of the final restoration, the interim restoration's success rate was determined. There was no difference between the retention of the two provisional materials. Fabrication time was significantly different with Barricaid restorations requiring less than one-half the fabrication time of the Caulk Temporary Crown and Bridge Resin material.
authors.affiliation: Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
authors.forename: J O
authors.initials: JO
authors.lastname: Burgess
authors.forename: C W
authors.initials: CW
authors.lastname: Haveman
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Butzin
mesh_terms: D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003794:Dental Restoration, Temporary; D006801:Humans; D008689:Methacrylates; D008768:Methylmethacrylates; D010511:Periodontal Dressings; D011140:Polyurethanes; D012117:Resins, Synthetic; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: C073467:Barricaid; D008689:Methacrylates; D008768:Methylmethacrylates; D011140:Polyurethanes; D012117:Resins, Synthetic; C029824:urethane dimethacrylate luting resin