title: Census adjustment and the distribution of federal spending.
abstract: In 1989, programs that use population counts to determine the distribution of their funds transferred $236 per capita to state and local governments. If the 1990 census were adjusted to reflect undercounting, about 40% of state and local governments would receive increased grants averaging $56 per miscounted person; other jurisdictions would lose an almost equal amount of grant money. The surprisingly small reallocations arise because 1) total funds allocated by population are essentially fixed; 2) allocations depend on other factors in addition to population; and 3) programs vary as to whether they allocate funds in direct or inverse proportion to population.
authors.affiliation: Department of Economics, Bates College, Lewiston, ME 04240.
authors.forename: M P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Murray
mesh_terms: D003153:Community Health Services / Q000191:economics; D003710:Demography; D005380:Financing, Government; D011156:Population Density; D012046:Rehabilitation / Q000191:economics; D013219:State Government; D014481:United States