Variations in breast cancer management between a teaching and a non-teaching district.
We compared the management and outcome of 999 women with breast cancer presenting between 1982 and 1986 at two centres in a region, one in a teaching district. A comparison was also made with relevant research and The Kings Fund Consensus Statement. The centres frequently differed markedly in the investigations done, diagnostic procedures, histology reporting, axillary sampling, and in the treatment given, also differing from the Consensus with no trend towards it. Survival was better at the teaching centre, both disease-free (N.S.) and overall [odds ratio 1.46 (1.16-1.84) P = 0.0009 unadjusted]. This should be interpreted cautiously as the median follow-up time was relatively short and the study was non-randomised. We conclude that how women with breast cancer are managed is determined as much by where they are referred as by scientific evidence. This indicates the need to introduce standards and protocols into business plans, making audit and service specifications easier.
Basnett
I
I
Department of Public Health Medicine, Bloomsbury and Islington Health Authority, London, U.K.
Gill
M
M
Tobias
J S
JS
D000368:Aged; D000970:Antineoplastic Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000628:therapy*; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D005260:Female; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching; D006801:Humans; D008197:Lymph Node Excision; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000473:pathology; D008485:Medical Audit; D008875:Middle Aged; D009362:Neoplasm Metastasis
D000970:Antineoplastic Agents