Amniotic fluid volume assessment: comparison of ultrasonographic estimates versus direct measurements with a dye-dilution technique in human pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of our study was to compare the accuracy of clinical ultrasonographic techniques of amniotic fluid volume assessment with a dye-dilution technique.


METHODS
We compared amniotic fluid volume as measured by ultrasonographic techniques with a dye-dilution method in 50 women undergoing amniocentesis during the third trimester. Thirteen separate ultrasonographic techniques, including the amniotic fluid index, were evaluated with regression analysis.


RESULTS
Amniotic fluid volumes as determined by dye-dilution ranged between 129 and 4444 ml. The amniotic fluid index overestimated the actual volume by as much as 88.7% at lower volumes and underestimated the actual volume by as much as 53.9% at higher volumes.


CONCLUSIONS
Differences in measurement error between the other ultrasonographic methods and the amniotic fluid index did not appear to be sufficient to warrant changes in current clinical practice. A major source of error in ultrasonographic amniotic fluid volume assessment is that one-dimensional measurements are used to estimate the volume of a complex, three-dimensional object.
Dildy
G A
GA
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Lira
N
N
Moise
K J
KJ
Riddle
G D
GD
Deter
R L
RL
D000653:Amniotic Fluid; D003951:Diagnostic Errors; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D007201:Indicator Dilution Techniques; D016104:Oligohydramnios / Q000175:diagnosis; D006831:Polyhydramnios / Q000175:diagnosis; D011247:Pregnancy; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D016216:Ultrasonography, Prenatal