Comparative in vitro studies of sonic, ultrasonic and reciprocating scaling instruments.
Flat root surface areas of formalin-stored mandibular incisors with plaque and calculus were scaled by sonic (PHATELUS SONIC SCALER, SONIC FLEX 2000, TITAN-S SONIC SCALER) or ultrasonic instruments (HYGIENIST ULTRASONIC SCALER, CAVITRON) or by a new reciprocating scaling insert for the EVA/PROFIN system. The test areas were photographed by SEM and coded micrographs were independently graded by three examiners using the RCI (Remaining Calculus Index) and the RLTSI (Roughness Loss of Tooth Substance Index). The findings revealed that the sonic scalers as a group removed calculus more completely but also left significantly more roughness and loss of tooth substance than the other instruments tested. No difference was seen between the two ultrasonic scalers. The reciprocating insert gave results similar to those of the ultrasonic except for the scaling time which was significantly longer for the new "cleansing principle".
Jotikasthira
N E
NE
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway.
Lie
T
T
Leknes
K N
KN
D003728:Dental Calculus / Q000628:therapy / Q000648:ultrastructure; D003739:Dental Cementum / Q000648:ultrastructure; D003773:Dental Plaque / Q000628:therapy / Q000648:ultrastructure; D012534:Dental Scaling / Q000295:instrumentation*; D003804:Dentin / Q000648:ultrastructure; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D013016:Sound; D013997:Time Factors; D014072:Tooth Abrasion / Q000473:pathology; D014092:Tooth Root / Q000648:ultrastructure; D014464:Ultrasonic Therapy / Q000295:instrumentation*