Role of meaningful subgroups in explaining differences in perceived variability for in-groups and out-groups.
Five aspects of the complexity of the knowledge representation of business and engineering majors were examined to see whether these differed by group membership and whether these differences were related to differences in perceived variability. Significantly more subgroups were generated when describing the in-group than the out-group; this difference predicted the relative tendency to see the in-group as more variable, and when controlled for statistically, out-group homogeneity effects were eliminated. Familiarity, redundancy, number of attributes used to describe the group, and the deviance of the subgroups from the larger group generally showed differences for in-group and out-group but did not show consistent evidence of mediation. In a 2nd study, Ss who were asked to sort group members into meaningful subgroups perceived greater variability relative to those who did not perform the sorting task.
Park
B
B
University of Colorado, Boulder 80309.
Ryan
C S
CS
Judd
C M
CM
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006126:Group Processes; D006127:Group Structure; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D017008:Negotiating; D010551:Personality; D012107:Research Design; D012919:Social Behavior; D013240:Stereotyping; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires