Estimation of age structure in anthropological demography.
The past decade has produced considerable debate over the feasibility of paleodemographic research, with much attention focusing on the question of reliability of age estimates. We show here that in cases where age is estimated rather than known, the traditional method of assigning individuals to age classes will produce biased estimates of age structure. We demonstrate the effect of this bias both mathematically and by computer simulation, and show how a more appropriate method from the fisheries literature (the "iterated age length key") can be used to estimate age structure. Because it is often the case that ages are also estimated for extant groups, we suggest that our results are relevant to the general field of anthropological demography, and that it is time for us to improve the statistical basis for age structure estimation. We further suggest that the oft noted paucity of older individuals in skeletal collections is a simple result of the use of inappropriate methods of age estimation, and that this problem can be rectified in the future by using maximum likelihood estimates of life table or hazard functions incorporating the uncertainty of age estimates.
Konigsberg
L W
LW
Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996.
Frankenberg
S R
SR
D000367:Age Factors; D001106:Archaeology / Q000379:methods; D003710:Demography; D006801:Humans; D015993:Life Tables; D008433:Mathematics; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009026:Mortality; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D010163:Paleontology / Q000379:methods; D011336:Probability