title: A study of the performance and comparability of the sampling response to cotton dust of work area and personal sampling techniques.
abstract: In order to compare and contrast the sampling response to cotton dust of two forms of dust sampling 85 work areas were identified over a 2-year period for investigation in eight Lancashire spinning mills. Three hundred and five work area dust samples were undertaken and 252 personal dust samples were performed. Operatives who spent a minimum of 80% of their working shift in the area in which work area sampling was also performed were selected for personal sampling. Work area dust exposures have recently shown an upward trend, with highest concentrations occurring in the ring spinning room (median 1.15 mg m-3, range 0.82-2.06). Personal dust samples showed a reduction in dust exposures as cotton processing progressed, from a high in the opening room (median value of 6.24 mg m-3, range 1.0-41.5) to a minimum of 1.02 mg m-3 (range 0.30-0.93) in the winding room. The ratio of measured personal sampling dust exposure to work area sampling exposure was used to compare the relative performance of the two techniques. This ratio was highest in the early processes. There was a 7.8-fold difference in measurement between the two techniques in the opening processes, falling to 4.9 in carding and 4.2 in the other card-room processes. However in ring spinning the ratio was only 1.4, suggesting a degree of comparability in the methods at this stage of processing. The value rose to 2.5 for the last stage (winding). Respiratory disease is known to occur predominantly in the early stages of processing (opening and carding) where high dust concentrations are found using the personal technique. These data support the use of personal sampling for setting exposure limits to cotton dust in preference to the current recommended method using work area sampling techniques, which may significantly underestimate dust exposure in the high risk work areas and is outdated.
authors.affiliation: Department of Thoracic and Occupational Medicine, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, U.K.
authors.forename: R M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Niven
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Fishwick
authors.forename: C A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Pickering
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Fletcher
authors.forename: C J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Warburton
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Crank
mesh_terms: D004391:Dust / Q000032:analysis*; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D003368:Gossypium; D006801:Humans; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000032:analysis*; D013783:Textile Industry
chemical_list: D004391:Dust