title: [Hallux valgus: the McBride procedure or subcapital osteotomy?].
abstract: The authors compared the long term follow-up (mean duration 19 years) of 96 patients operated on for hallux valgus, 52 by the McBride procedure, 46 by a Hohmann procedure. Clinical results considered 4 criteria: deformity, pain, mobility and satisfaction. Dorsoplantar weight bearing X-ray compared anatomical results. This study showed that patients were subjectively more satisfied after McBride operation (p = 0.0001) even if the deformity was radiologically better reduced by osteotomy (p = 0.006). This discrepancy between subjective and radiologic results was related to the fact that X-rays represent only the static morphologic reflect of a more complex pathologic entity: radiology can only partly explain the functional discomfort of the patients. The modified McBride procedure was better suited to patients presenting a painful HV. Osteotomy was more suited to bunions causing little pain. Indications for each of these procedures should be based more on patient's history and clinical examination than on X-rays.
authors.affiliation: Hôpital orthopédique, Lausanne, Suisse.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Udin
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Dutoit
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006215:Hallux Valgus / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D010027:Osteotomy / Q000379:methods*; D012189:Retrospective Studies
vernacular_title: Hallux valgus: intervention de McBride ou ostéotomie sous-capitale?