Human exposure assessment. II: Quantifying and reducing the uncertainties.
Alternative methods of human exposure assessment that reduce and/or allow quantification of the uncertainties associated with exposure estimates are surveyed and illustrated. These alternative approaches include (1) use of more appropriate exposure parameter default values rather than values that result in extreme exposure estimates; (2) incorporation of time-activity data to better define appropriate exposure duration values; (3) the use of reasonable exposure scenarios rather than the traditional Maximally Exposed Individual (MEI) approach; (4) the use of stochastic approaches such as Monte Carlo-based and information analysis-based methods; (5) use of bivariate analysis to identify the extent to which interdependencies between different exposure parameters affect the distribution of exposure estimates; (6) use of less-than-lifetime exposure and risk assessment; and (7) incorporation of physiological considerations relevant to absorbed dose estimation, including route-specific impacts, use of improved absorption factors, and application of pharmacokinetic models. Other ways to improve the exposure assessment process, including assuring statistical equivalency in comparing different exposure estimates and incorporation of sensitive subpopulation considerations are also discussed, as are key research needs.
Whitmyre
G K
GK
Technology Sciences Group Inc. Washington, D.C. 20036.
Driver
J H
JH
Ginevan
M E
ME
Tardiff
R G
RG
Baker
S R
SR
D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards*; D015386:Hazardous Substances / Q000493:pharmacokinetics; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D015993:Life Tables; D008452:Maximum Allowable Concentration; D008954:Models, Biological; D014481:United States; D014484:United States Environmental Protection Agency
D015386:Hazardous Substances