title: Surgical pathology of the intervertebral disc. Is routine examination necessary?
abstract: A retrospective review of 508 charts of patients undergoing laminectomy for all reasons was carried out with special attention to the preoperative diagnosis, postoperative diagnosis, pathologic diagnosis, and discharge diagnosis. The elimination of routine pathologic examination of surgical discectomy specimens would not have lowered the standard of care; the pathologist's report had no discernible influence on patient management. Unusual clinical features will continue to require careful examination of surgical specimens by the pathologist. Millions of healthcare dollars can be saved by eliminating this routine examination, which is based on outmoded routines. Hospital medical staffs who wish to change this practice must revise their hospital bylaws in keeping with the standards of the The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO).
authors.affiliation: University of Florida Health Science Center, Jacksonville.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Boutin
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Hogshead
mesh_terms: D003363:Cost Control; D003955:Diagnostic Tests, Routine / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D007403:Intervertebral Disc / Q000473:pathology*; D007405:Intervertebral Disc Displacement / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D007796:Laminectomy; D010340:Pathology, Surgical / Q000191:economics; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013048:Specimen Handling / Q000191:economics