title: Challenging misperceptions about nurses' moral reasoning.
abstract: Discussions in the nursing literature about the usefulness of Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning for women and nurses, and assertions about the level of moral reasoning scores of nurses have been clouded by inaccuracies and misperceptions. In this article, theoretical and measurement issues related to moral reasoning are clarified and a critical review of the literature is provided about the moral reasoning of nursing students and nurses as measured by the Defining Issues Test (DIT). The review indicates the need for greater rigor in studies of moral reasoning among nurses and the need for accuracy in interpreting and reporting moral reasoning scores. The data show that the moral reasoning of nurses, like that of other groups, tends to increase with formal education. Nurses' scores are usually comparable to, and sometimes higher than, scores of their academic peers.
authors.affiliation: School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Duckett
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rowan-Boyer
authors.forename: M B
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Ryden
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Crisham
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Savik
authors.forename: J R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Rest
mesh_terms: D004993:Ethics, Nursing; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D035863:Moral Development; D009014:Morals; D009726:Nurses / Q000523:psychology*; D015399:Nursing Research / Q000379:methods; D011581:Psychological Tests; D013338:Students, Nursing / Q000523:psychology