title: Cemented versus uncemented femoral components in the ring hip prosthesis.
abstract: A prospective, randomised and independently assessed trial of the Ring UPM total hip replacement showed that the quality of the early result was better if the femoral prosthesis was cemented than if it was not. More patients with cemented prostheses were painfree at four months (58% cemented:42% uncemented) and at one year (63% cemented:50% uncemented), but at two years pain relief was equal in both groups. At two years significantly more patients with cemented prostheses could walk without support (96% cemented:62% uncemented, p = 0.01 to 0.05). There is a need for more similar trials to compare the results of contemporary designs of cemented and uncemented total hip prostheses.
authors.affiliation: Black Notley Hospital, Braintree, Essex, England.
authors.forename: S P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Godsiff
authors.forename: R J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Emery
authors.forename: M B
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Heywood-Waddington
authors.forename: T L
authors.initials: TL
authors.lastname: Thomas
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D000368:Aged; D001178:Arthroplasty / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D008124:Locomotion; D008297:Male; D008768:Methylmethacrylates; D008875:Middle Aged; D015207:Osteoarthritis, Hip / Q000601:surgery*; D010146:Pain; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011474:Prosthesis Design
chemical_list: D008768:Methylmethacrylates