Aseptic technique in microgravity.
Within the next decade, the United States will launch a space station into low Earth orbit as a preliminary step toward a manned mission to Mars. Provision of asepsis in the unique microgravity environment, essential in operative and invasive procedures, is addressed. An assessment of conventional terrestrial aseptic methods and possible modifications for a microgravity environment was done during the microgravity portion of parabolic flight on NASA KC-135 aircraft. During 110 parabolas on three flight days, a "surgical team" (surgeon, scrub nurse and circulating nurse) using a life size mannequin fastened to a prototype surgical "work station" (operating table), evaluated open and closed gloving (ten parabolas), skin preparation (six parabolas), surgical scrub methods (24 parabolas), gowning (22 parabolas) and draping (48 parabolas). Evaluated were povidone iodine solution, 1 percent povidone iodine detergent, Chloroxylenol with detergent, wet prep soap sponge, a water insoluble iodophor polymer (DuraPrep, 3M), disposable towels, disposable and reusable gowns, large and small disposable drapes with and without adhesive edges, disposable latex surgeon's gloves with and without packaging modifications and restraint mechanisms (tether, swiss seat, waist and foot restraint devices, fairfield and wire clamps and clips). Ease of use, provision of restraint for supplies and personnel and waste disposal were assessed. The literature was reviewed and its relevance to the space environment discussed, including risk factors, environmental contamination, immune status and microbiology. The microgravity environment, limited water supply and restricted operating area mandated that modifications of fabrication and packaging of supplies and technique be made to create and preserve asepsis. Material must meet stringent flammability and off-gassing standards. Either a chlorhexidine or povidone iodine detergent prepackaged brush and sponge would provide an adequate scrub plus preliminary cleansing of a dirty wound. Choice may depend on ease of removal from the water supply as well as sensitivity to each compound of individual crew members. Rinsing was achieved with sterile water soaked gauze. Drying would be more efficient with two small hand towels, which would be easier to manipulate in microgravity and require less stowage volume. Skin preparation highlighted unexpected packaging problems, as centrifugal force was required to "shake" the solution out of the container on to the mannequin. To minimize contamination, a gown should be folded in an accordion manner and fastened to the base of its sterile wrapper, so that an assistant can compensate for the lack of gravity by applying constant tension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
McCuaig
K
K
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
D000337:Aerospace Medicine; D001207:Asepsis / Q000379:methods*; D005932:Gloves, Surgical; D006112:Gravitation; D006235:Hand Disinfection; D008506:Medical Waste; D011300:Preoperative Care / Q000379:methods; D011481:Protective Clothing; D012149:Restraint, Physical; D012867:Skin; D013525:Surgical Instruments
D008506:Medical Waste