title: Implications of reference axes used for rotational alignment of the femoral component in primary and revision knee arthroplasty.
abstract: A careful review of the literature revealed that no data had been reported on the angular difference or similarity between the posterior condylar axis used by many surgeons for primary total knee arthroplasty and the transepicondylar axis, which has been considered a useful anatomical landmark for femoral component placement in revision total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine whether measurable differences exist between the posterior condylar axis and the transepicondylar axis of the human femur. Nineteen pairs of human donor femora were measured. This study demonstrated that when the posterior condylar axis was taken as 0 degrees of rotation, the transepicondylar axis was found to be approximately 5 degrees externally rotated for both right and left femora, a significant difference (P < .05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the angle measured between the posterior condylar axis and the transepicondylar axis when comparisons were made between matched right and left femora (P > .05). It is suggested that this information can be applied to improving the techniques currently used in the placement of both primary and revision femoral knee components.
authors: Bone and Joint Research Laboratory, VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84148.
authors: J P
authors: JP
authors: Mantas
authors: R D
authors: RD
authors: Bloebaum
authors: J G
authors: JG
authors: Skedros
authors: A A
authors: AA
authors: Hofmann
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans; D007720:Knee Prosthesis / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012086:Reoperation; D012399:Rotation