An asbestos hazard in North Devon.
In March 1990, following the careless removal of asbestos-based ceiling tiles in a leisure centre in North Devon, delay in action by the local authority meant that the risk to staff and members of the public was ignored for four months. The Director of Public Health was then approached to tackle the problem of providing advice to both leisure centre staff and the public in order to deal with the concern that had arisen as a result of the delay. There was a public statement, a report to the local authority, and a 'hotline' for members of the public. Leisure centre staff members were individually interviewed by a doctor using a specially designed occupational health questionnaire and followed up as appropriate. Twenty-one chest X-rays were taken on the advice of the local chest physician. Although the level of exposure was small, and there was no significant threat to health, the incident caused major public concern, was an embarrassment to the local authority, and involved the Health and Safety Executive and considerable input from the Department of Public Health Medicine. Most importantly for a small district, it was a major public relations exercise for Public Health Medicine. This paper examines the appropriateness and effectiveness of intervention by Public Health Medicine in a situation where the risks were known to be very low but public anxiety, fuelled by compensation possibilities, was very high.
Pearson
V A
VA
Department of Public Health Medicine, North Devon Health Authority, Barnstaple.
Sims
P A
PA
D001194:Asbestos / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000032:analysis*; D004739:England; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000209:etiology; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000032:analysis*; D011634:Public Health; D011641:Public Relations; D012307:Risk Factors
D001194:Asbestos