Allocation of attention, reading skills, and deafness.
Brannan and Williams (1987) found that poor readers cannot successfully utilize parafoveal cues to identify letter targets. Whether a similar deficit in the use of cue information occurs in deaf poor readers and whether it is only specific to processes that capture attention automatically were investigated in congenitally deaf young adults classified as poor or good readers and hearing controls classified as good readers. Subjects were presented with central or parafoveal cues that varied in cue validity probability, followed by letter targets presented to the left or right of fixation. The reaction time data analyses showed significant main effects for cue type and cue location and significant interactions among cue type, cue location, cue validity probability, and visual field. No significant main effect or interactions involving groups were found. These results raise the possibility that reading difficulties associated with deafness do no involve a deficit in the visual attentional system of deaf people. They also confirm that parafoveal cues are more effective than central cues in capturing attention.
Parasnis
I
I
Department of Communication Research, Rochester Institute of Technology, NY 14623-0887.
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D003638:Deafness / Q000175:diagnosis*; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011932:Reading; D014794:Visual Fields