title: Cruzan and the constitutionalization of American life.
abstract: In America today, public policy governing an increasing number of social issues is made through the judicial enforcement of constitutional rights. Cruzan raised the question whether policy regarding the withdrawal of medical care from incompetent patients is to be handled similarly. This essay argues that privacy-rights doctrine provides a poor basis for constructing public policy in this area. It suggests that the Court has been unable to articulate a convincing basis for privacy rights and that the basis the Court seems to assume poorly fits many circumstances to which it is applied. The essay further contends that the Court has been unable to describe a persuasive method of analyzing the state interests that are at stake in privacy cases and to accommodate those interests in a reasonable way. The essay concludes that these are issues as to which policy is better formed through a political, not judicial, process.
authors: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.
authors: C E
authors: CE
authors: Schneider
mesh_terms: D016223:Advance Directives / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D026688:Bioethical Issues; D003128:Coma; D003249:Constitution and Bylaws; D005260:Female; D006291:Health Policy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D033222:Judicial Role; D007872:Legal Guardians; D008020:Life Support Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011057:Politics; D012297:Right to Die / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D035521:Supreme Court Decisions; D014481:United States; D028761:Withholding Treatment