Childhood malignancies and decision making.
Failure to obtain "adequate" medical care for a child constitutes child neglect, which may be used as the basis for prosecution of parents, removal of the child from the home, or court-ordered medical treatment. "Adequate" care is usually construed as that which is given by a licensed physician, but, in case of dispute, courts almost never engage in choosing one medical approach over another. The principle that parents may not refuse medical care, however, is made very difficult when children have malignancies--the long-term nature of the treatment means that, if the child is left at home, court order or not, the parents may flee with their child. Removing the child from the home, however, adds that trauma to the ill child's burdens. Questions should be asked before making a request to a court to order a therapy which will prolong but not save a child's life if the parents would prefer to spare their child the side effects. Parents, however, may always refuse to permit their child to participate in research studies, no matter how promising. Adolescents are increasingly believed to be capable of medical decision making; most courts, however, would not allow an adolescent to refuse life-saving treatment.
Holder
A R
AR
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D002655:Child Custody / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D002669:Child Welfare / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D002675:Child, Preschool; D000529:Complementary Therapies; D003657:Decision Making; D015507:Drugs, Investigational; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D033222:Judicial Role; D016365:Liability, Legal; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000628:therapy*; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D033282:Parental Consent; D036302:Therapeutic Human Experimentation; D016312:Treatment Refusal
D015507:Drugs, Investigational