title: Inductive reasoning in clinical psychoanalysis.
abstract: It is argued that clinical observations can be used to test psychoanalytic theories. Psychoanalysis cannot use controlled experiments but it can use the standard canons of inductive reasoning to test the reliability of conflicting theories. Conflicting hypotheses concerning narcissism and object relations are analysed to identify crucial observations that can be used for testing. If these experiments in theory testing are reliable they show that psychoanalysis is not limited to being a hermeneutic discipline but rather has legitimate claims to be a natural science.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Hanly
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001008:Anxiety Disorders / Q000150:complications / Q000628:therapy; D003866:Depressive Disorder / Q000150:complications / Q000628:therapy; D004532:Ego; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D009769:Object Attachment; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D011572:Psychoanalysis; D011574:Psychoanalytic Theory; D011575:Psychoanalytic Therapy