Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
Amalgam (ANA 2000), composite resin (Occlusin), and glass ionomer cement (ChemFil) were compared in conventional Class II restorations in second primary molars. Twenty-five restorations of each material were placed by two dentists in 50 patients. The restorations were evaluated during a three year period using the USPHS criteria. Great differences could be found between the materials. The failure rate (USPHS ratings Charlie) was after three years 8 per cent for the amalgam, 16 per cent for the composite resin and 60 per cent for the glass ionomer cement restorations.
Ostlund
J
J
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Linköping, Sweden.
Möller
K
K
Koch
G
G
D002126:Calcium Hydroxide / Q000737:chemistry; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry*; D003722:Dental Alloys / Q000737:chemistry; D003723:Dental Amalgam / Q000737:chemistry*; D003736:Dental Cavity Lining; D003764:Dental Materials / Q000737:chemistry; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000145:classification / Q000379:methods; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000737:chemistry*; D006801:Humans; D008422:Materials Testing; D008963:Molar; D012823:Silicate Cement / Q000737:chemistry; D012834:Silver / Q000737:chemistry; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013499:Surface Properties; D014094:Tooth, Deciduous; D014520:Urethane / Q000737:chemistry
D003188:Composite Resins; D003722:Dental Alloys; D003764:Dental Materials; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; C054101:ChemFil II; C056413:Occlusin; D012823:Silicate Cement; D014520:Urethane; D012834:Silver; D003723:Dental Amalgam; C047093:ANA 2000; C040408:Life (dental material); D002126:Calcium Hydroxide