Observations on ethical problems and terminal care.
Progress in medical diagnosis and therapy has raised new problems with far-reaching ethical implications. Medicine must remain a profession and not become a business. Textbooks must address ethical problems in the context of health care decisions and not restrict themselves to pathophysiology and practical therapeutics alone. The relative roles of the principles of autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice must be balanced and appropriately applied to individual situations in biomedical ethics. When therapy becomes futile and the suffering of the patient does not justify any anticipated benefit, the patient (and/or patient surrogate) may request withholding or even withdrawing life-prolonging interventions. In the persistent vegetative state, even nutritional support by an unnatural (tube) route may ethically be denied at the patient's (or surrogate's) informed decision. New areas of ethical evaluation have been raised by the desire of some individuals to prolongation of their lives at high expense to the society such that other individuals are denied services because of limitation of available resources. There has been a long-standing conflict of interest between the acceptance by physicians and/or medical institutions of money or gifts from pharmaceutical companies whose drugs they prescribe, stock, or sell. This practice increases the cost of the drugs and is, in effect, a "sick tax," which is morally wrong.
Fischer
D S
DS
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
D026686:Beneficence; D003128:Coma; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D003657:Decision Making; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D008020:Life Support Care; D008495:Medical Oncology; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D040841:Resource Allocation; D013727:Terminal Care; D013782:Textbooks as Topic; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D028761:Withholding Treatment