Redefining the science-practice relationship and professional training.
A revised conception of the relationship between psychological science and professional practice is proposed in the light of postmodern changes in perspectives on knowledge. Positivistic science, which has dominated the traditional interpretation of scientist-practitioner training, is considered from a constructivist point of view to be only one possible foundation of psychological knowledge. It is argued that the knowledge base of the profession should be derived with diverse methods and from multiple sources, including the knowledge of practice. The mutuality of science and practice is emphasized. An evolving framework for understanding the epistemology of practice, based on cognitive psychology, is presented. Emphasis on broadened choices of research methods, the development of reflective skills, and better linkage between teaching in the domains of research and practice are urged. Suggestions for research related to scientific training and the knowledge processes of practice are offered.
Hoshmand
L T
LT
Department of Counseling, California State University, Fullerton 92634.
Polkinghorne
D E
DE
D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D011364:Professional Practice / Q000639:trends*; D011586:Psychology, Clinical / Q000193:education*; D012106:Research; D014481:United States