Justice and the moral acceptability of rationing medical care: the Oregon experiment.
The Oregon Basic Health Services Act of 1989 seeks to establish universal access to basic medical care for all currently uninsured Oregon residents. To control the increasing cost of medical care, the Oregon plan will restrict funding according to a priority list of medical interventions. The basic level of medical care provided to residents with incomes below the federal poverty line will vary according to the funds made available by the Oregon legislature. A rationing plan such as Oregon's which potentially excludes medically necessary procedures from the basic level of health care may be just, for the right to publically-sponsored medical care is restricted by opposing rights of private property. However, the moral acceptability of the Oregon plan cannot be determined in the absence of knowing the level of resources to be provided. Finally, Oregon to date has failed to include the individuals being rationed in discussions as to how the scarce resources are to be distributed.
Nelson
R M
RM
Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.
Drought
T
T
D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D017048:Health Care Costs; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008484:Medicaid / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000458:organization & administration*; D017057:Medically Uninsured / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D009014:Morals; D009922:Oregon; D018579:Patient Selection; D040841:Resource Allocation; D012935:Social Justice; D012945:Social Values; D013221:State Health Plans / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D014481:United States