Asymptomatic mandibular third molars: oral surgeons' judgment of the need for extraction.
Ten oral surgeons were asked to judge the need for extraction of asymptomatic mandibular third molars. Thirty-six mandibular third molars with equal distribution of angular position, impaction status, and patient's sex and age were selected. To estimate the consistency of judgment, the 36 cases were duplicated so that, in all, 72 cases were judged. The judgment of the oral surgeons was compared with that of 30 general dental practitioners (GDPs). The number of mandibular third molars the oral surgeons proposed to extract varied from 3 to 21 of 36 teeth. The mean number of molars proposed for extraction was 12 for the oral surgeons and 13 for the GDPs. There was no third molar that all the observers in the two groups agreed should be extracted. About three times as many observers in both groups proposed extraction of molars partially covered by soft tissue. The oral surgeons were unanimous in their judgment not to extract 11 molars, and the GDPs were also unanimous in judgment not to extract two of these. The mean intraobserver agreement within the two groups was comparable, 94% for the oral surgeons and 92% for the GDPs. We conclude that there is a great variation among oral surgeons in their judgment on the need for removal of asymptomatic mandibular third molars. A similar variation in judgment also was observed among GDPs.
Knutsson
K
K
Department of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, University of Lund, Malmö, Sweden.
Brehmer
B
B
Lysell
L
L
Rohlin
M
M
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003657:Decision Making; D003815:Dentists; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008964:Molar, Third / Q000601:surgery*; D015588:Observer Variation; D011364:Professional Practice; D013515:Surgery, Oral; D014081:Tooth Extraction / Q000523:psychology*; D014095:Tooth, Impacted / Q000601:surgery