title: Patency after iliac and femoro-popliteal angioplasty. Difference between angiographic and clinical results.
abstract: Twenty-five patients with clinical relapse after previous successful angioplasty of iliac or femoro-popliteal arteries were evaluated with repeat angiography. The angiographic patency was 80% despite the clinical symptoms. The discrepancy between the angiographic appearance and the clinical findings was explained by the progress of the general arteriosclerotic vascular disease. Such progression is more important regarding late prognosis than the result of the angioplasty per se.
authors.affiliation: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Thorvinger
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Norgren
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Albrechtsson
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000800:Angioplasty, Balloon; D001161:Arteriosclerosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D005263:Femoral Artery / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007083:Iliac Artery / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011150:Popliteal Artery / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000502:physiology; D011859:Radiography; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014654:Vascular Patency