title: Comparison of iohexol-240 versus iohexol-300 in abdominal CT.
abstract: Forty patients without evidence of liver, kidney, or significant cardiac disease were prospectively divided into two groups of 20, receiving either iohexol-240 or iohexol-300. A contrast load of 150 ml was administered in conjunction with a rapid scanning technique at a preselected, fixed level to include liver, renal cortex, and aorta. Peak enhancement was calculated as change in Hounsfield units (HU) over baseline for each area of interest. Mean peak enhancement and standard deviation were calculated for each organ, and the difference between the means for the two contrast agents was compared using the Student's t test. Differences were not statistically significant with all p values greater than 0.05. Our results suggest iohexol-240 is preferred to iohexol-300 for body computed tomography (CT) due to its lower cost and iodine load without statistically significant change in diagnostic quality of the examination.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195.
authors.forename: A A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Singer
authors.forename: J R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Tagliabue
authors.forename: D M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Paushter
authors.forename: G P
authors.initials: GP
authors.lastname: Borkowski
authors.forename: D M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Einstein
mesh_terms: D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007472:Iohexol; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009994:Osmolar Concentration; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement; D011860:Radiography, Abdominal; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D007472:Iohexol