The feasibility of mandatory HIV testing for health professionals and other special populations.
Infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has become an increasingly important public health problem. Due to the profound increase in the incidence of the disease, testing has become an important tool in prevention efforts as well as treatment. In view of the dire prognosis associated with the diagnosis of HIV infection, there is a great deal of interest in mandatory HIV testing of special groups. Mandatory testing has been implemented for several groups such as the United States military. However, there are a number of issues to be considered before implementing a mandatory testing program. These include the predictive value and accuracy of the tests themselves, confidentiality and the social ramifications of breaches in confidentiality, the likelihood of forcing high risk persons underground to avoid testing, and the constitutionality of a mandatory testing policy. Since the discovery of the apparent transmission of HIV infection from a dentist to his patients, there has been increasing interest in a policy mandating the testing of health professionals. However, in view of the low risk of transmission to patients, it would be ill-advised to require HIV testing of health care workers. In general, the benefits of a mandatory testing policy do not outweigh the human and financial costs it would engender.
Smallwood
K G
KG
Adult Medicine Clinic, OUHSC, Tulsa 74129.
D015492:AIDS Serodiagnosis / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D006281:Health Occupations / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011291:Premarital Examinations / Q000592:standards; D014481:United States