title: Embryo transfer to the uterus or the fallopian tube after in vitro fertilization yields similar results.
abstract: The outcome of ZIFT and IVF-ET was compared in consecutive nontubal factor patients in a prospective fashion. Groups did not differ in characteristics and were matched by the number of prezygotes/pre-embryos transferred. Overall, implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and ongoing PRs were not statistically different. These results suggest that ZIFT offers no significant advantage over IVF-ET for the treatment of nontubal infertility.
authors.affiliation: Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk 23507.
authors.forename: T L
authors.initials: TL
authors.lastname: Toth
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Oehninger
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Toner
authors.forename: R G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Brzyski
authors.forename: A A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Acosta
authors.forename: S J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Muasher
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004624:Embryo Transfer / Q000379:methods*; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005187:Fallopian Tubes; D005260:Female; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro; D015181:Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer; D006801:Humans; D007247:Infertility, Female / Q000628:therapy; D014599:Uterus; D015053:Zygote