The role of instructions and familiar size in absolute judgments of size and distance.
The effects of familiar size and instructions (apparent, objective) on direct reports of size and distance were evaluated. Subjects estimated the size and distance of two different-sized playing cards or two unfamiliar stimuli under either apparent or objective instructions. The stimuli were presented successively at a distance of 5.48 m under reduced-cue conditions. The form of the instructions selectively influenced the effect of familiar size on absolute judgments of size and distance, with apparent instructions minimizing, and objective instructions promoting, familiar-size effects. The ratio of the distance judgments of the first to the second presented stimuli approximated the relative retinal sizes of the two objects under both apparent and objective instructions, while the ratio of size judgments tended to be either influenced by or independent of the object's relative retinal sizes under apparent and objective instructions, respectively. These results are consistent with Gogel's theory of off-size perception and, in particular, with the claim that, in comparison with apparent instructions, objective instructions are more likely to direct observers to base their judgments on cognitive, as opposed to perceptual, sources of spatial information.
Predebon
J
J
Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
D000328:Adult; D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D003210:Concept Formation; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D004215:Distance Perception; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D011601:Psychophysics; D012718:Set, Psychology; D012858:Size Perception