title: Peripherally inserted central catheters. Guidewire versus nonguidewire use: a comparative study.
abstract: To date, no research articles have been published that explore the practice of using guidewires for placement of peripherally inserted central catheters. The literature contains speculations regarding the pros and cons of guidewire use. However, no studies to date have compared patient outcomes when peripherally inserted central catheter lines are inserted with and without guidewires. To examine the use of guidewires for peripherally inserted central lines, a comparative study was conducted at two acute care facilities, one using guidewires for insertion and one inserting peripherally inserted central catheter lines without guidewires. 109 catheters were studied between January 1, 1990 and January 1, 1991. The primary focus of this study was to examine whether guidewire use places patients at higher risk for catheter-related complications, particularly phlebitis. No significant differences in phlebitis rates between the two study sites were found. Other catheter-related and noncatheter-related complications were similar between the two facilities. The results of this study do not support the belief that guidewire use increases complication rates.
authors.forename: S C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Loughran
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Edwards
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: McClure
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002140:California / Q000453:epidemiology; D002405:Catheterization, Central Venous / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards; D002406:Catheterization, Peripheral / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D012307:Risk Factors; D013924:Thrombophlebitis / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000209:etiology; D016896:Treatment Outcome