Filtering versus parallel processing in RSVP tasks.
An experiment of McLean, D. E. Broadbent, and M. H. P. Broadbent (1983) using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) was replicated. A series of letters in one of 5 colors was presented, and the subject was asked to identify the letter that appeared in a designated color. There were several innovations in our procedure, the most important of which was the use of a response menu. After each trial, the subject was presented with 7 candidate letters from which to choose his/her response. In three experimental conditions, the target, the letter following the target, and all letters other than the target were, respectively, eliminated from the menu. In other conditions, the stimulus list was manipulated by repeating items in the series, repeating the color of successive items, or even eliminating the target color. By means of these manipulations, we were able to determine more precisely the information that subjects had obtained from the presentation of the stimulus series. Although we replicated the results of McLean et al. (1983), the more extensive information that our procedure produced was incompatible with the serial filter model that McLean et al. had used to describe their data. Overall, our results were more compatible with a parallel-processing account. Furthermore, intrusion errors are apparently not only a perceptual phenomenon but a memory problem as well.
Botella
J
J
Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.
Eriksen
C W
CW
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003118:Color Perception; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D006801:Humans; D009903:Optical Illusions; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010469:Perceptual Distortion; D011601:Psychophysics; D011930:Reaction Time; D012691:Serial Learning