title: Critique of the session on diagnostic testing.
abstract: During the session on diagnostic testing, various diagnostic tests used to identify the cause of chest pain were discussed. This critique of diagnostic assessments of the complex etiology of chest pain is presented as a contribution toward further investigation and clarification of this difficult clinical syndrome. The first step in the evaluation process is to exclude coronary artery disease. Patients with angina and normal coronary artery flow may have atypical disease, such as microvascular angina or syndrome X. The precise relationship between these disorders and esophageal disease or gastroesophageal reflux, as well as their possible involvement in chest pain of undetermined origin, requires further definition. A limitation of esophageal provocation tests is that they may identify the esophagus as the source of pain without determining the specific esophageal disorder that causes the pain. Problems associated with 24-hour pH and pressure monitoring include (a) poor correlation between reflux episodes and heartburn symptoms, (b) the lack of a good functioning swallowing signal, and (c) the huge amount of data that must be analyzed, along with shortcomings in computer-aided analysis. Nevertheless, the various available diagnostic tests can provide important information to the clinician.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Belgium.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Vantrappen
mesh_terms: D000787:Angina Pectoris / Q000175:diagnosis; D002637:Chest Pain / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology*; D006801:Humans