Radiologists, communication, and Resolution 5: a medicolegal issue.
Resolution 5, adopted by the American College of Radiology, sets forth principles of direct communication that are important to every radiologist. This article reviews pertinent court decisions that affect radiologists and illustrates the importance of Resolution 5. In recent cases in state courts, liability standards have focused on four areas: negligence based on failure to personally inform clinicians of the diagnosis, ability of the jury to decide whether the radiologist's actions were appropriate, provision of information to the correct person, and necessity for expert testimony to define urgency. An important factor in liability cases appears to be the judgment of the radiologist in selection of the correct individual to receive the radiology report. The authors believe that electronic communication devices (eg, voice mail and fax machines) may potentially breach confidentiality and that such devices should therefore be used sparingly. Verbal communication by the radiologist to the referring physician, in addition to a written report, should avoid liability and improve quality of care for the patient.
Kline
T J
TJ
Department of Pathology, Lankenau Hospital, Wynnewood, PA 19096.
Kline
T S
TS
D003142:Communication; D003219:Confidentiality / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011871:Radiology / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D014481:United States