title: Reliability of video taped interviews with children suspected of being sexually abused.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the reliability of judgments about the likelihood of child sexual abuse based only on video recorded interviews.
  
  
  METHODS
  Blinded rating of likelihood of abuse by seven professional groups and comparison with consensus rating.
  
  
  METHODS
  Child and adolescent psychiatry centre.
  
  
  METHODS
  Four people from each of seven professional disciplines: specialist psychiatrists, general psychiatrists, experimental psychologists, trainee social workers, trainee clinical psychologists, lawyers, and police.
  
  
  METHODS
  Rating of 12 recorded interviews.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Agreement between the consensus panel and professional groups was 83% (151/183) for high likelihood cases (seven cases) and 89% (118/132) for low likelihood cases (five). Specialist psychiatrists and the police were better able to identify high likelihood cases than were other groups with less experience of interviewing sexually abused children (91% (48/53) v 79% (102/129); p = 0.05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Raters could accurately distinguish children with low likelihood of abuse on interview evidence alone, but those with more experience of dealing with sexual abuse were better at identifying high likelihood cases.
authors.affiliation: Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Guy's Hospital, London.
authors.forename: M R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Wiseman
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Vizard
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bentovim
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Leventhal
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002650:Child Abuse, Sexual / Q000175:diagnosis*; D002675:Child, Preschool; D006801:Humans; D007406:Interview, Psychological / Q000379:methods*; D007600:Judgment; D015588:Observer Variation; D011361:Professional Competence; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014743:Videotape Recording