title: Comparison of instruments for dual-energy X-ray bone mineral densitometry.
abstract: While bone mineral densitometry has become a common laboratory test, it is important to pay attention to the compatibility of the results from different instruments. In this study results from three commercially available bone densitometers are compared using both patient and phantom studies. Overall correlation between instruments was good but there were systematic discrepancies in the results. The three instruments provided bone mineral density (BMD) values that differed by as much as 13.5% due to differences as large as 6% in bone mineral content and as large as 7% in bone area. Thus, the BMD values obtained from different manufacturers' instruments are not directly comparable.
authors.affiliation: Kuopio University Hospital, Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Finland.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Vainio
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Ahonen
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Leinonen
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Sievänen
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Koski
mesh_terms: D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon / Q000295:instrumentation*; D000328:Adult; D015519:Bone Density; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D008961:Models, Structural; D012016:Reference Values