title: Assessing the likelihood of reliable workplace behavior: further contributions to the validation of the Employee Reliability Inventory.
abstract: This paper summarizes a number of studies in which the validity of the Employee Reliability Inventory, a preemployment screening instrument designed to assess the likelihood of reliable and productive workplace behavior, was examined. Criterion-related studies compared the scores of a broadly diverse group of job applicants with those obtained from an array of criterion and comparison groups, for whom there was documented evidence of reliable or unreliable behavior. Criterion-related evidence indicates that the six scales are effective in differentiating a variety of criterion groups with unreliable behavior from a number of different job applicant comparison groups. Construct-related evidence for the validity of an emotional adjustment scale is reported as well. The issue of response distortion in preemployment inventories is discussed, and data are reported which indicate that scores on all six scales appear to be functionally free from the potentially confounding effects of response distortion. These results are consistent with the original validation and cross-validation findings, which supported the validity of the six scales when assessing the likelihood of reliable behavior in a population of job applicants.
authors.affiliation: Harvard Medical School.
authors.forename: G L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Borofsky
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000437:Alcoholism / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D004650:Employee Performance Appraisal; D005260:Female; D006760:Hospitalization; D006801:Humans; D007586:Job Application; D008297:Male; D010555:Personality Inventory / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011594:Psychometrics; D012050:Rehabilitation, Vocational / Q000523:psychology*; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*