Evaluation of active anterior and posterior rhinomanometry in normal subjects.
In this study active anterior (AAR) and active posterior (APR) rhinomanometry were performed by 100 normal subjects with a Mercury rhinomanometer according to the recommendations of the International Standardization Committee. There was no significant difference between total nasal airway resistance (Rna) values obtained with APR by direct measurement and those calculated from AAR. Mean total Rna was 0.31 Pa/cm3/s (range 0.13-0.84) at a reference pressure of 75 Pa. Measurements by AAR were more reproducible than those by APR, mean intrasubject coefficients of variation were 12 and 16% respectively. This reproducibility was similar to that of lower airways' resistance measurements. Rna values from this population did not conform to a normal Gaussian distribution. Rna was higher during expiration than inspiration and values were higher in women than in men.
Shelton
D M
DM
Lewisham Hospital, London, UK.
Eiser
N M
NM
D000328:Adult; D000403:Airway Resistance / Q000502:physiology*; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008365:Manometry / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D009666:Nose / Q000502:physiology*; D011312:Pressure; D012123:Pulmonary Ventilation / Q000502:physiology; D012016:Reference Values; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012907:Smoking / Q000503:physiopathology; D013990:Tidal Volume / Q000502:physiology