[Detection of dissection of the thoracic aorta: improved specificity by magnetic resonance tomography in comparison with echocardiography techniques].
The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of conventional transthoracic and transoesophageal two-dimensional echocardiography combined with color-coded Doppler flow imaging (TEE) and ECG-triggered magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection and associated epiphenomena. A total of 53 patients with clinically suspected aortic dissection were subjected to a transthoracic and transoesophageal ultrasound examination and magnetic resonance imaging; the results of each imaging modality were compared and validated against the morphological standards of contrast angiography (n = 53) and/or intraoperative findings (n = 27) or autopsy (n = 7). In this series no deleterious events were encountered with either non-invasive imaging method. In contrast to conventional echocardiography the sensitivities of both MRI and TEE were 100% for detecting a dissection of the thoracic aorta, irrespective of its location. However, the specificity of TEE was lower than the specificity of MRI for a dissection (TEE 68.2% versus MRI 100%; p less than 0.005), which resulted from false positive TEE findings mainly confined to the ascending segment of the aorta (specificity of TEE 78.8% versus 100% by MRI; p less than 0.01). In addition, MRI proved to be more sensitive than TEE in detecting the formation of thrombus in the false lumen of both the aortic arch (p less than 0.01) and the descending segment of the aorta (p less than 0.05). There were no discrepancies between the two imaging techniques in detecting the site of entry to a dissection, aortic regurgitation or pericardial effusion. Both MRI and TEE are atraumatic, safe, and highly sensitive methods to identify and classify acute and subacute dissections of the entire thoracic aorta. However, TEE is associated with lower specificity for lesions in the ascending aorta. These results may still favor TEE after a precursory screening transthoracic echogram in suspected aortic dissection, but will establish MRI as an excellent method to avoid false positive findings. Anatomical mapping by MRI may emerge as a promising comprehensive approach and, eventually, as a morphological standard to guide surgical interventions.
Nienaber
C A
CA
Abteilungen für Innere Medizin II (Kardiologie), Universitätskrankenhauses Eppendorf, Hamburg.
von Kodolitsch
Y
Y
Siglow
V
V
Piepho
A
A
Stiel
G M
GM
Jaup
T
T
Spielmann
R P
RP
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000784:Aortic Dissection / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D001013:Aorta, Thoracic / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D001014:Aortic Aneurysm / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D004452:Echocardiography; D015150:Echocardiography, Doppler; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D013927:Thrombosis / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery
Nachweis der thorakalen Aortendissektion: Verbesserte Spezifität durch Magnetresonanztomographie gegenüber echokardiographischen Techniken.