Getting the story straight: evaluating the test-retest reliability of a university health history questionnaire.
This study was designed to establish the reliability of a health history questionnaire used as a screening tool for incoming university students. The authors used a test-retest design, with a test interval of 6 months, on a sample of medical and nursing students. The analysis focused on overall reliability of the questionnaire and reproducibility of specific items, based on question format. Questionnaire items of specific interest were those with dichotomous yes/no response options versus open-ended format questions, those using the words frequently or recently, or those that asked multiple questions. Demographic characteristics of the subjects were considered in the evaluation of reliability. Overall reliability of the questionnaire (93.6%) was above the anticipated level of 90%, and subject sex or program of study did not show any significant differences in reproducibility of responses. Although wording of questions did not affect item reliability, dichotomous format questions demonstrated a higher degree of reliability (96.4%) than the overall reliability of the questionnaire. Recommendations for enhancing the reliability of the questionnaire are based on item analysis and information gathered from interviews with subjects.
Gilkison
C R
CR
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
Fenton
M V
MV
Lester
J W
JW
D000328:Adult; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000592:standards*; D008487:Medical History Taking / Q000592:standards*; D008875:Middle Aged; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013333:Student Health Services; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires / Q000592:standards*; D014495:Universities