title: Discriminability of load heaviness: implications for the psychophysical approach to manual lifting.
abstract: The main objective of this study was to investigate human ability to discriminate between different levels of load heaviness in manual lifting. Twelve male college students participated in the laboratory experiment. Twenty-eight sequences of five boxes that weighed from 5 to 64 lbs (2.27-29.1 kg) were used. The subjects were asked to arrange boxes in each sequence in order of the perceived (increasing or decreasing) heaviness, i.e., from lightest to the heaviest box, or from heaviest to the lightest box. The subjects were also asked to assign linguistic descriptors of perceived load heaviness to each box in the sequence, and to indicate the confidence levels regarding correctness of the assigned box order and assignment of linguistic values. The independent variables included magnitude of weight and load differential between the successive weights in a sequence. The number of sequential ordering errors, assignment of linguistic variables, and estimated confidence levels were highly dependent on the load differential and weight range. It was concluded that in order to assure reliable results of the psychophysical approach to determining the values of maximum acceptable weight of lift, the adjustment process for male subjects should require using small weights of at least 4 lbs (1.8 kg) to be added or removed from the lifted box. The results of this study also suggest that the error rate in load discriminability can be controlled below the 10% level, if the relative difference in weight between successive boxes lifted is at least 12%. Given the above findings, it is suggested that usefulness of some of the recommendations for setting safe limits for manual lifting tasks, which were reached based on the psychophysical approach and broadly reported in the past, may need to be carefully re-examined. Finally, this study showed that the Weber fraction for load heaviness over the range of lifted weights from 8.6 to 29.1 kg is between 0.03 and 0.04.
authors.affiliation: Center for Industrial Ergonomics, University of Louisville, Kentucky 40292.
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Karwowski
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Shumate
authors.forename: J W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Yates
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Pongpatana
mesh_terms: D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010807:Physical Endurance; D011601:Psychophysics; D012449:Safety; D014892:Weight Perception; D016474:Weight-Bearing; D014938:Work Capacity Evaluation