When siting works, Canada-style.
Hazardous waste management poses increasing problems for Canadian provinces and American states, given the vast quantities and types of wastes generated and the virtual inability to open new storage, treatment, or disposal facilities. The Canadian experience is very similar to the American one in many respects, except for the fact that three provinces (Alberta, Manitoba, and Quebec) have devised alternative approaches to siting that appear successful in moving beyond the political gridlock so common on this issue. In each of these cases, traditional, top-down approaches to siting have been eschewed in favor of a more comprehensive approach that includes extensive public participation, economic and social compensation packages, formal partnerships between public and private organizations, and direct links between siting proposals and other aspects of waste management, including waste reduction, recycling, and export/import control.
Rabe
B G
BG
D000416:Alberta; D003264:Containment of Biohazards / Q000191:economics*; D004782:Environmental Health / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards; D006256:Hazardous Waste / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000517:prevention & control; D006801:Humans; D008350:Manitoba; D011792:Quebec; D012037:Refuse Disposal / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000379:methods
D006256:Hazardous Waste