Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of other cues present during training of that specific stimulus.
The comparator hypothesis is a response rule stating that responding to a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus (CS) reflects the associative strength of the CS relative to that of other cues (comparator stimuli) that were present during CS training. Thus, modulation of the associative strength of a CS's comparator stimulus should alter responding to that CS. These studies examined the stimulus specificity of this effect using within-subjects designs. Rats were trained on 2 CSs, each with a unique comparator stimulus, to determine the degree to which posttraining extinction of the comparator stimulus for one CS influences responding to the other CS. Using negative contingency (Experiments 1 and 2), overshadowing (Experiment 3), and local context (Experiment 4) preparations, stimulus specificity was observed. In each case, posttraining extinction of the comparator stimulus for one CS had greater impact on responding to that CS than on responding to the alternate CS.
Miller
R R
RR
Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Binghamton 13902-6000.
Barnet
R C
RC
Grahame
N J
NJ
D000818:Animals; D001143:Arousal; D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D001362:Avoidance Learning; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D005108:Extinction, Psychological; D005239:Fear; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D051381:Rats; D011919:Rats, Inbred Strains