title: Against relative timing invariance in movement kinematics.
abstract: The kinematics of stair climbing were examined to test the assertion that relative timing is an invariant feature of human gait. Six male and four female subjects were video-recorded (at 60 Hz) while they climbed a flight of stairs 10 times at each of three speeds. Each gait cycle was divided into three segments by the maximum and minimum angular displacement of the left knee and left foot contact. Gentner's (1987) analysis methods were applied to the individual subject data to determine whether the duration of the segments remained a fixed proportion of gait cycle duration across changes in stair-climbing speed. A similar analysis was performed using knee velocity maxima to partition the gait cycle. Regardless of how the gait cycle was divided, relative timing was not found to remain strictly invariant across changes in speed. This conclusion is contrary to previous studies of relative timing that involved less conservative analysis but is consistent with the wider gait literature. Strict invariant relative timing may not be a fundamental feature of movement kinematics.
authors.affiliation: Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, Australia.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Burgess-Limerick
authors.forename: R J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Neal
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Abernethy
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005260:Female; D005684:Gait; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation; D007699:Kinesthesis; D008297:Male; D008838:Microcomputers; D011930:Reaction Time; D014743:Videotape Recording / Q000295:instrumentation