title: Evaluation of quality of life in clinical trials. Selecting quality-of-life measures.
abstract: The strategy for evaluating quality of life in clinical trials is an important and complex issue. By comparing the performance of different quality-of-life measures before and after estrogen replacement therapy, it was shown that disease-specific measures had obvious advantages. Although narrow in applicability to the particular patient group, they were the most responsive measures in detecting small, clinically important changes. In clinical trials more attention should be given to how side effects, which often have important implications with regard to quality-of-life, are recorded.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Ostra Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Wiklund
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Karlberg
mesh_terms: D000279:Administration, Cutaneous; D000328:Adult; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D004338:Drug Combinations; D004958:Estradiol / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008525:Medroxyprogesterone / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects; D008593:Menopause / Q000187:drug effects / Q000523:psychology; D008875:Middle Aged; D011788:Quality of Life; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D004338:Drug Combinations; D004958:Estradiol; D008525:Medroxyprogesterone