Dietary roughage regimen for feedlot steers: reduced roughage level (2%) during the mid-finishing period.
Because roughage in feedlot diets is one of the most expensive ingredients on an energy basis, regimens that minimize roughage usage are of interest. Crossbred steers of British breeds (n = 112, initial BW = 405 kg) were used to compare the feeding of diets containing 2% roughage from d 22 through 84 and 10% roughage from d 85 to finish (d 133; 2/10%) to the feeding of 10% roughage throughout the finishing period (10/10%); all diets were based on steam-flaked sorghum grain and contained monensin and tylosin. When the 2% roughage diet was fed, steers consumed less feed (6.8 vs 7.8 kg/d, P less than .01), tended to gain less (1.11 vs 1.20 kg/d, P = .13), and were numerically more efficient (16.5 vs 15.5 kg of gain/100 kg of DMI, P greater than .2) than steers fed the 10% roughage diet (10/10%). After the roughage content was increased from 2 to 10% on d 85 (all steers fed 10% roughage), steers fed the 2/10% regimen had greater DMI (8.4 vs 8.0 kg/d, P = .08) and ADG (1.29 vs 1.09 kg, P = .06), and tended to be more efficient (15.4 vs 13.6 kg of gain/100 kg of DMI, P = .10) than steers fed the 10/10% regimen. Steers fed the two regimens had similar (P greater than .2) overall gain performance. The 2/10% regimen tended to have a greater percentage of Choice carcasses (58 vs 42%, P = .14) and numerically more liver abscesses (24 vs 15%, P greater than .2) than the 10/10% regimen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Bartle
S J
SJ
Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409.
Preston
R L
RL
D000821:Animal Feed; D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000254:growth & development*; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D004043:Dietary Fiber / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D004435:Eating; D008297:Male; D008460:Meat / Q000592:standards; D011897:Random Allocation; D015430:Weight Gain