Comparison of continuous and intermittent bolus infusions of metoclopramide during 5-day continuous intravenous infusion with cisplatin.
In order to decide the administration method of metoclopramide for prevention or control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in multidrug chemotherapy, with cisplatin 5-day continuous intravenous infusion (25 mg/m2/day) for patients with advanced lung cancer, a randomised crossover study of intermittent bolus infusion (1 mg/kg, 30 min, every 8 h, day 1-5) and continuous infusion (3 mg/kg/24 h, 120 h) of metoclopramide was performed. Both regimens included methylprednisolone and diphenhydramine given concurrently. The acute and delayed antiemetic effects were examined. 21 cases could be evaluated. There were 6 and 10 cases (P = 0.048), respectively, of no nausea and no vomiting; 14 and 18 cases (P = 0.048), respectively, of no vomiting; and vomiting episodes were seen 27 and 9 times, respectively (P = 0.042). Thus, metoclopramide continuous infusion was significantly superior in antiemetic effect compared to bolus infusion. Neither method had any serious side-effects and both were safe.
Mori
K
K
Department of Thoracic Disease, Tochigi Cancer Center, Japan.
Saitou
Y
Y
Tominaga
K
K
Yokoi
Miyazawa
N
N
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002289:Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Q000188:drug therapy; D002945:Cisplatin / Q000009:adverse effects*; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007262:Infusions, Intravenous; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy; D008297:Male; D008787:Metoclopramide / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D008875:Middle Aged; D009325:Nausea / Q000139:chemically induced / Q000188:drug therapy*; D014839:Vomiting / Q000139:chemically induced / Q000188:drug therapy*
D008787:Metoclopramide; D002945:Cisplatin