title: Human spermatozoa selected by Percoll gradient or swim-up are equally capable of binding to the human zona pellucida and undergoing the acrosome reaction.
abstract: Several techniques have been used for selecting motile spermatozoa including Percoll and albumin gradients, swim-up, and glass wool filtration. A high yield of motile spermatozoa as well as an enhancement of motility are the most desirable features of a practical method. An equally important consideration is whether or not these techniques select functionally normal spermatozoa. In this study we have compared two methods for separation of motile cells, swim-up and Percoll gradient. Normal semen samples from 12 different men were used in this study. Each sample was simultaneously processed by swim-up and Percoll gradient using modified Tyrode's medium. After the sperm concentration was adjusted to 1 x 10(7) spermatozoa/ml, the suspensions were incubated at 37 degrees C, 5% CO2 in air. In each suspension the percentage of sperm recovery, percentage of motile spermatozoa, percentage of acrosome reacted spermatozoa (either spontaneously or stimulated with human follicular fluid), percentage of zona-free hamster oocytes penetrated, and number of spermatozoa bound to the human zona pellucida were determined. The results obtained indicated that the percentage of sperm recovery was higher with the Percoll gradient than with the swim-up procedure (P less than 0.001). However, no significant differences were found between these two sperm populations in the percentage of motile cells, in the percentage of acrosome reacted spermatozoa, and in the percentage of zona-free hamster oocytes penetrated. In addition, the number of spermatozoa bound per zona pellucida was similar for spermatozoa selected by Percoll or swim-up. We conclude that there were no functional differences between the spermatozoa selected by either method.
authors.affiliation: Unit of Reproduction and Development, Faculty of Biological Sciences, P. Catholic University of Chile, Santiago.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Morales
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Vantman
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Barros
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Vigil
mesh_terms: D000177:Acrosome / Q000187:drug effects; D000818:Animals; D002452:Cell Count; D002469:Cell Separation / Q000379:methods*; D002499:Centrifugation, Density Gradient; D003102:Colloids; D006224:Cricetinae; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008647:Mesocricetus; D009865:Oocytes / Q000166:cytology; D011205:Povidone; D012822:Silicon Dioxide; D013076:Sperm Count / Q000187:drug effects; D013081:Sperm Motility / Q000187:drug effects; D013084:Sperm-Ovum Interactions / Q000187:drug effects; D015044:Zona Pellucida
chemical_list: D003102:Colloids; C016039:Percoll; D012822:Silicon Dioxide; D011205:Povidone