[Ambulatory diagnosis of prostatic growth. Analysis of the basic methods to determine its benign or malignant nature].
Correlation between different diagnostic procedures rectal touch (RT), intravenous urography (IU), ultrasonography (USG), acid phosphatases and prostatic fraction (AFPF) and the histology of benign and malign growths is analyzed, as well as the relationship between different combinations of these procedures and histology, addressing sensitivity, specificity and negative and positive predictive values; according to our experience RT and USG obtain the best results.
Blasco Casares
F J
FJ
Servicio de Urología, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona.
Saladié Roig
J M
JM
Bayona Areñas
S
S
Ponce de León Castell
I
I
D000368:Aged; D000553:Ambulatory Care; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011470:Prostatic Hyperplasia / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
Diagnóstico ambulatorio de los crecimientos prostáticos. Análisis de los métodos básicos para determinar la benignidad y la malignidad.