title: A case of a pseudomalfunction of a DDD pacemaker.
abstract: DDD pacemaker pseudomalfunction occurred in a 65-year-old man. This was due to premature ventricular contraction (PVC) response option and cross-talk detection window, which are designed to protect against pacemaker related tachycardia or cross-talk. Pseudomalfunction disappeared by eliminating PVC response option.
authors.affiliation: Cardiovascular Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Ajiki
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Sagara
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Namiki
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Ishibashi
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Iinuma
authors.forename: L T
authors.initials: LT
authors.lastname: Fu
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kato
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000465:Algorithms; D005117:Cardiac Complexes, Premature / Q000517:prevention & control; D002304:Cardiac Pacing, Artificial / Q000379:methods*; D004562:Electrocardiography; D004867:Equipment Design; D004868:Equipment Failure; D006327:Heart Block / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010138:Pacemaker, Artificial