title: A longitudinal follow up of neurodevelopment of high risk newborns--a comparison of Amiel-Tison's method with Bayley Scales of Infant Development.
abstract: The neurodevelopment of 42 high risk babies and 7 control babies was assessed longitudinally till the age of 12 months by using two different methods. The method of neurological evaluation described by Amiel-Tison was used, and the results compared with those of a standard developmental test, the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. The Amiel-Tison method was found to be a sensitive test for picking up abnormalities till the age of 9 months, but lost its advantage over the Bayley Scales at 12 months. Besides, the test was quick, simple to learn and did not need a special kit or a trained psychologist and was hence found to be a good screening method.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, KEM Hospital, Pune.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Chaudhari
authors.forename: S V
authors.initials: SV
authors.lastname: Shinde
authors.forename: S S
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Barve
authors.forename: H S
authors.initials: HS
authors.lastname: Dixit
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pandit
mesh_terms: D002675:Child, Preschool; D002658:Developmental Disabilities / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007230:Infant, Low Birth Weight; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D012307:Risk Factors