Comparative audit of booking and mid-trimester ultrasound scans in the prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies.
During 1988 and 1989, 3565 women booked under consultants who performed an ultrasound scan at booking, whilst 4984 booked under consultants who performed a formal mid-trimester scan between 16 and 18 weeks. All significant anomalies diagnosed prenatally and in the neonatal period were recorded, the incidence in each group being 12.9/1000 and 9.83/1000, respectively (NS). The sensitivity of diagnosis before 20 weeks was 45 percent in the 'mid-trimester' group (kappa 0.62) compared with 30 percent in the 'booking' group (kappa 0.46), overall sensitivity of prenatal diagnosis, however, being similar in both groups (63 vs. 65 percent, kappa 0.77 vs. 0.79). Cardiac anomalies were the single largest group which were not detected equally prenatally in both groups. This study shows that formal mid-trimester scanning leads to anomalies being detected significantly earlier in the antenatal period. Although not statistically significant, three lethal anomalies were missed prenatally in the 'booking' group which we would have expected to diagnose on a mid-trimester scan. These figures are discussed in the light of previous reports.
Constantine
G
G
Birmingham Maternity Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Edgbaston, U.K.
McCormack
J
J
D000013:Congenital Abnormalities / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D005260:Female; D006330:Heart Defects, Congenital / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D006801:Humans; D011247:Pregnancy; D011261:Pregnancy Trimester, First; D011262:Pregnancy Trimester, Second; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D016135:Spinal Dysraphism / Q000175:diagnosis; D016216:Ultrasonography, Prenatal; D000509:alpha-Fetoproteins / Q000032:analysis
D000509:alpha-Fetoproteins