title: [Comments on the debate about euthanasia].
abstract: On the one hand euthanasia raises the question of humane dying (1). On the other side it is connected with the question of "wrongful existence" (2). The ambiguity of the term "human/humane life" might be explained in the following way: in respect of group 1 one might say that nobody is privileged to define materially or pragmatically the one who holds the dignity of man. In consequence no one may be killed because he lacks this type of criteria. Concerning group 2: a) No one may be expected to kill an innocent, defenceless human being; and there does not exist any right of demanding such a thing. b) Everyone has the right to get medicine for lessening pain. c) In case of b) death may not be intended on purpose, but may be accepted as a side-effect of medical treatment. d) Though you can formulate a rule of thumb there will occur tragical dilemmas with regard to cases of coma.
authors.affiliation: Technischen Universität Kaiserslauten.
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Zwierlein
mesh_terms: D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005065:Euthanasia; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D006801:Humans; D010166:Palliative Care; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D012297:Right to Die
vernacular_title: Anmerkungen zur Debatte um Euthanasie.