Cost-effectiveness of gamete intrafallopian transfer in comparison with induction of ovulation with gonadotropins in the treatment of female infertility: a clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the cost-effectiveness of gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) with that of conventional infertility treatment in couples with female infertility, excluding tubal factors.


METHODS
Patients were randomly divided in two groups: receiving GIFT or conventional infertility treatment. For a period of 2 years, GIFT was compared with conventional infertility treatment in couples with endometriosis, anovulation, idiopathic infertility, cervical mucus factor, female immunologic factor, or multifactorial causes of infertility in a randomized clinical trial.


METHODS
The study was performed in the Unit for Human Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, Republic of South Africa.


METHODS
One hundred seventy-four successive couples with female infertility were selected for the study. All couples were from the higher socioeconomic bracket.


METHODS
One group received GIFT and the other received conventional infertility treatment consisting of induction of ovulation with gonadotropins followed by intrauterine artificial insemination or normal intercourse.


METHODS
The results were stratified according to the specific cause of infertility. Outcome was measured by the success rate per treatment cycle, as well as the cost per pregnancy.


RESULTS
Overall, GIFT proved to be successful in 26.7% of treatment cycles compared with 9.7% with conventional therapy.


CONCLUSIONS
After careful analysis, the authors came to the conclusion that GIFT is more cost-effective than conventional infertility treatment in patients with endometriosis and anovulation. In patients with idiopathic infertility, immunologic infertility, a cervical mucus factor, and multifactorial infertility, induction of ovulation followed by intrauterine artificial insemination or normal intercourse proved to be more cost-effective.
Wessels
P H
PH
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, Republic of South Africa.
Cronjé
H S
HS
Oosthuizen
A P
AP
Trümpelmann
M D
MD
Grobler
S
S
Hamlett
D K
DK
D003075:Coitus; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005260:Female; D015181:Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer; D006801:Humans; D007247:Infertility, Female / Q000628:therapy*; D007315:Insemination, Artificial; D010062:Ovulation Induction; D011247:Pregnancy; D011256:Pregnancy Outcome; D013019:South Africa; D016896:Treatment Outcome