Resource allocation in contemporary paediatrics: the case against high technology.
High technology has introduced a new dimension to medical treatment. There are inevitable social costs as well as benefits, and the allocation of resources to high technology, as opposed to other areas of health care, is a contentious issue. The current balance in health service funding between high technology and low technology is not appropriate. It is driven by the technological imperative and only offers solutions to a limited number of problems. There is a scarcity of health resources left to develop intersectoral responses and provide adequate funding for research into person-intensive interventions suitable for many problems. Arguments against allocating too many resources to high technology in paediatrics are examined in this paper.
Vimpani
G V
GV
University of Newcastle, Area Child and Family Health Services, Hamilton, New South Wales, Australia.
D001315:Australia; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D017048:Health Care Costs / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D015931:Intensive Care, Neonatal; D010372:Pediatrics; D011788:Quality of Life; D040841:Resource Allocation; D018570:Risk Assessment; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical; D013675:Technology, High-Cost / Q000191:economics; D026712:Value of Life