title: [Meaning of the "scientific validity clause" of private hospital insurance (section 5/1 f MB/KK 76). With reference to recent verdicts].
abstract: As per Section 5/1 f of the classic conditions 1976 of the "Association of private health insurance carriers" (Verband der privaten Krankenversicherung), benefits won't be paid for methods of examination or treatment and remedies which are from the scientific point of view generally not recognized. Basic reflections have led to the fact that today the term "scientifically recognized methods" and the term "traditional medicine" will be treated as equivalent. Contrary verdicts, according to which treatments on the basis of anthroposophic medicine or by means of electro-acupuncture by Voll would be considered as generally recognized medicine from the scientific point of view and would have to be paid by the private health insurance carriers, are consequently not comprehensible. Supposing that the trend continues that private health insurers have to pay more and more expenses incurred for all kind of outsider-methods, this would lead not only to a great drain on the purse of the private health insurance carriers, but have also unpleasant consequences for the whole medicine, because the uniformity of the medicine is endangered. To take steps against has not only to be the task of the private health insurance carriers, but it is also in the interest of the physicians and, at last, of the patients, too.
authors.affiliation: Stabsabteilung Arztlicher Dienst, Hallesche-Nationale Krankenversicherung aG.
authors.forename: G M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Ostendorf
mesh_terms: D000529:Complementary Therapies; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D007342:Insurance Benefits / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*
vernacular_title: Die Bedeutung der "Wissenschaftlichkeitsklausel" der privaten Krankenversicherung (Section 5/1 f MB/KK 76). Unter Berücksichtigung der neueren Rechtsprechung.