title: Precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography, and common duct exploration.
abstract: Thirty-four patients with suspected common bile duct stones were randomized to undergo endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal prior to open cholecystectomy or to have open cholecystectomy, operative cholangiography, and common bile duct exploration. Sixteen underwent the first protocol, and 18 the second. Analysis of the ability to clear stones from the common bile duct, morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, length of operation, and hospital cost showed no difference in outcome between patients treated by either method. These data suggest there is neither an advantage nor a disadvantage to treating patients with suspected duct stones by precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver.
authors.forename: G V
authors.initials: GV
authors.lastname: Stiegmann
authors.forename: J S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Goff
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mansour
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Pearlman
authors.forename: R M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Reveille
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Norton
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002758:Cholangiography; D002760:Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; D002763:Cholecystectomy; D042882:Gallstones / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007432:Intraoperative Period; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications