title: Clonidine and scopolamine: differences and similarities in how they change human information processing.
abstract: 1. Humans have been tested on a choice reaction time task designed to disclose interactions between stimulus complexity and drug effect. 2. Tests were carried out using oral scopolamine (1.2 mg) and clonidine (0.2 mg). 3. Reaction times and event related potentials were measured. 4. Both drugs slowed reaction time and the N1 component of the ERP. 5. SCOP slows RTs to easy-to-discriminate stimuli more than RTs to harder stimuli. Its effect on P3 is the same for both types of stimuli. 6. CLON tends to slow P3 latencies to easy stimuli more than P3 latencies to harder stimuli, while the RT slowing is almost identical for both types of stimuli.
authors.affiliation: San Francisco Veterans Administration Medical Center, CA.
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Callaway
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Halliday
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Naylor
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Brandeis
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003000:Clonidine / Q000494:pharmacology*; D003071:Cognition / Q000187:drug effects; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000187:drug effects; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008606:Mental Processes / Q000187:drug effects*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000187:drug effects; D012601:Scopolamine / Q000494:pharmacology*
chemical_list: D012601:Scopolamine; D003000:Clonidine