title: Does the Kaufman prosthesis still have a place? Review of thirteen years' experience.
abstract: The cases of 57 patients who underwent implantation of a Kaufman prosthesis for urinary incontinence at this center are reviewed. All except one of the patients were incontinent following prostatic surgery. Although many of the patients required revision or adjustments after the initial implantation, 55 percent of the cases eventually had a satisfactory outcome. Patients rendered incontinent after retropubic prostatectomy had a higher success rate with the Kaufman prosthesis than patients after other types of prostatectomy. This simple and relatively inexpensive device can still play a useful role in the treatment of patients with mild and moderate stress incontinence following prostatectomy.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Urology, London, England.
authors.forename: A F
authors.initials: AF
authors.lastname: Durrani
authors.forename: T P
authors.initials: TP
authors.lastname: Rosenbaum
authors.forename: P J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Shaw
authors.forename: S K
authors.initials: SK
authors.lastname: Singh
authors.forename: P H
authors.initials: PH
authors.lastname: Worth
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D004867:Equipment Design; D004868:Equipment Failure; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000009:adverse effects; D014549:Urinary Incontinence / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D016741:Urinary Sphincter, Artificial / Q000191:economics