title: Comparative efficiency of a survival-based case-control design and a random selection cohort design.
abstract: Ambidirectional studies are useful when information about disease status is available on a cohort but a risk factor has still to be recorded. An example is the study of the influence of HLA phenotypes on the progression of HIV carriers towards AIDS. An ambidirectional design is proposed in which the cases and controls are defined by the survival duration of the subjects; it includes as special cases some other ambidirectional designs. Its efficiency is compared with that of a random selection cohort design both analytically and by computer simulation. It is shown that when the size of the cohort is large, appreciable gains in power can be achieved by this type of design even when there is no censoring.
authors.affiliation: INSERM U330, Université de Bordeaux, France.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Commenges
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Moreau
mesh_terms: D000163:Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D015331:Cohort Studies; D006801:Humans; D011897:Random Allocation; D012107:Research Design / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012307:Risk Factors; D016019:Survival Analysis