title: Self-reported versus behavioral self-handicapping: empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction.
abstract: The present study was an investigation of how Ss would respond when given 2 self-handicapping options, 1 behavioral (withdrawal of practice effort) and 1 self-reported (reporting high levels of stress). Ss anticipating a diagnostic test of intellectual ability were given different instructions regarding the effects of stress and practice on test performance. Ss were told that (a) stress only, (b) practice only, (c) both stress and practice, or (d) neither stress nor practice affected test scores. Ss were then given the opportunity to self-report a handicap on a stress inventory and to behaviorally self-handicap by failing to practice before the test. High self-handicapping men and women showed evidence of self-reported handicapping, but only high self-handicapping men behaviorally self-handicapped. However, when both self-handicaps were viable, both high self-handicapping men and women preferred the self-reported over the behavioral self-handicap.
authors.affiliation: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
authors.forename: E R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: Hirt
authors.forename: R K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Deppe
authors.forename: L J
authors.initials: LJ
authors.lastname: Gordon
mesh_terms: D000124:Achievement; D001076:Aptitude; D003674:Defense Mechanisms; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007389:Internal-External Control; D009042:Motivation; D012649:Self Concept; D012931:Social Environment