title: MRI of female uterine and juxta-uterine masses: clinical application in 25 patients.
abstract: The clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of gynecologic masses was evaluated in 25 patients. In each patient the final pathologic diagnosis was semiquantitatively correlated with the diagnostic impressions from pelvic examination, ultrasound and MRI. There were 9 uterine, 11 ovarian and 5 nonovarian pelvic masses. Pelvic examination correlation with final diagnosis was 26%, consistent with the literature. Ultrasound fared surprisingly poorly, with only 44% correlation. MRI showed an 87% correlation with the final diagnosis. MRI was able to accurately identify masses, discriminate adnexal masses from fluid-filled bowel, identify dermoids, and in one case obviated surgery in a pregnant patient. MRI provided significant clinical management information with greater accuracy than did ultrasound or pelvic examination.
authors.affiliation: University of Pittsburgh, Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Aubel
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Wozney
authors.forename: R P
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Edwards
mesh_terms: D000291:Adnexal Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D010048:Ovarian Cysts / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D010049:Ovarian Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D010808:Physical Examination; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014463:Ultrasonography; D014591:Uterine Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D014594:Uterine Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology