title: Is subitizing a unique numerical ability?
abstract: Two models that predict the relation between mean enumeration time and numerosity in a speeded enumeration experiment are tested. The first is a bilinear two-process model, and the second is a log-linear single-process model. Previously, support for the bilinear model has provided evidence for the existence of a unique numerical ability called "subitizing." Both models are shown to yield close approximations to the empirical data, but at the same time to consistently violate the robust shape of these data. Two fundamental discrepancies exist: (1) Enumeration of single-element displays is unpredictably fast, both in the data reported here and elsewhere, and (2) the response-time function for multiple elements is continuously convex upward, with a significant log-quadratic component. The findings support the contention that enumeration is a capacity-limited process, but not statistically reliable change in processing character, that is, from subitizing to some other process, is evident in enumeration of displays of up to six elements.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
authors.forename: J D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Balakrishnan
authors.forename: F G
authors.initials: FG
authors.lastname: Ashby
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001076:Aptitude; D001288:Attention; D003118:Color Perception; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D006801:Humans; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011340:Problem Solving; D011930:Reaction Time