title: Prudence in international comparisons: insights for the United States from the Canadian health insurance experience.
abstract: Canadian social insurance for medical care started in the province of Saskatchewan in 1946, when conditions were very different from those in the United States today. The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation political party has no counterpart in the United States today. Voluntary insurance was weak in the Canadian priaries, but currently strong in the United States. The U.S. Medicare and Medicaid programs help elderly and poor people, but Saskatchewan lacked such programs. Separation of executive and legislative powers in the United States differs from unified powers in Canada. However, there are several similarities between the U.S. federation of states, and the Canadian provinces. The U.S. Democratic Party has a progressive wing. Voluntary insurance in the United States grew weaker in the 1980s. The U.S. health care crisis on costs today is equivalent to post-Depression conditions in Canada. Both countries are dominated by private fee-for-service medical care, but access to that care has been promoted by compulsory insurance laws in several U.S. states. Therefore, the United States could well emulate Canada by action of the states, which would lead eventually to federal action. Coverage should be universal, with limited benefits initially; gradually, benefits would be broadened.
authors.affiliation: School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles 90024.
authors.forename: M I
authors.initials: MI
authors.lastname: Roemer
mesh_terms: D002170:Canada; D035082:Federal Government; D006302:Health Services Research; D049673:History, 20th Century; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000266:history* / Q000639:trends; D038622:Internationality; D011056:Political Systems; D014481:United States