Efficiency of two commercial ELISA kits compared with the BAM culture method for detecting Listeria in naturally contaminated foods.
The efficiency of 2 commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Listeria-Tek and Tecra) for detecting Listeria in naturally contaminated foods was evaluated and compared with that of the culture method described in the Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM). Both ELISAs use modified University of Vermont (UVM-1) medium as a primary enrichment; the BAM method uses Listeria enrichment broth. Secondary enrichments for Listeria-Tek and Tecra, respectively, were Fraser broth and UVM-2, which contains additional acriflavin-HCl. When ELISA test results differed, secondary enrichments were tested against the other ELISA; Fraser broth was used to determine recovery rates because of its superiority over UVM-2. Of the 178 food samples examined, the presence of Listeria was detected and culturally confirmed in 38, 37, and 40 samples by the BAM, Listeria-Tek, and Tecra methods, respectively. Differences in results of the ELISAs compared with those of the BAM method were not statistically significant; however, differences between results of the 2 ELISA methods were significant. It was concluded that as rapid screening methods, the Listeria-Tek and the Tecra kits qualify as alternative methods to the BAM cultural method.
Noah
C W
CW
Food and Drug Administration, Dallas, TX 75204.
Ramos
N C
NC
Gipson
M V
MV
D001431:Bacteriological Techniques; D015169:Colony Count, Microbial; D004797:Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / Q000295:instrumentation; D005516:Food Microbiology / Q000592:standards*; D008087:Listeria / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D011933:Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
D011933:Reagent Kits, Diagnostic