Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation.
In two equivalence experiments, a "think aloud" procedure modeled after Ericsson and Simon's (1980) protocol analysis was implemented to examine subjects' covert verbal responses during matching to sample. The purpose was to identify variables that might explain individual differences in equivalence class formation. The results from Experiment 1 suggested that subjects who formed equivalence classes described the relations among stimuli, whereas those not showing equivalence described sample and comparison stimuli as unitary compounds. Because Experiment 1 only demonstrated a correlation between describing stimulus compounds and the absence of equivalence classes, a second study was conducted. In Experiment 2, equivalence class formation was brought under experimental control through pretraining manipulations that facilitated responding either to stimulus compounds or to relations among stimuli. The results demonstrated that a history of describing stimulus compounds, when compared with describing the relations among the stimuli, interfered with the emergence of stimulus equivalence. These findings clarify individual differences in stimulus equivalence. They also demonstrate the utility of analyzing verbal reports to identify possible variables that can be manipulated experimentally.
Wulfert
E
E
Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Albany 12203.
Dougher
M J
MJ
Greenway
D E
DE
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003210:Concept Formation; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D006801:Humans; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011340:Problem Solving; D013850:Thinking; D014705:Verbal Behavior