title: Comparison of manually and mechanically mixed glass ionomers.
abstract: Two mechanically mixed glass ionomer restorative materials (Ketac-Fil and Fuji Cap II) were compared with two manually mixed products (Chelon-Fil and Fuji Type II). One manually mixed material was substantially weaker than the others in bond strength tests. No significant differences in microleakage were found among the materials.
authors.affiliation: Department of General Practice, University of Texas Health Science Center, Dental School, San Antonio.
authors.forename: R L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Cooley
authors.forename: T E
authors.initials: TE
authors.lastname: Train
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003722:Dental Alloys / Q000737:chemistry; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation; D003763:Dental Leakage; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D003804:Dentin; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000737:chemistry*; D006801:Humans; D008298:Maleates / Q000737:chemistry; D008422:Materials Testing; D008751:Methylene Blue; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013499:Surface Properties
chemical_list: D003722:Dental Alloys; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D008298:Maleates; C068076:Chelon Fil; C037885:Fuji-ionomer; C040964:Ketac-Fil; D008751:Methylene Blue