title: Randomised trial of patient triggered ventilation versus high frequency positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory distress.
abstract: Synchronous respiration during mechanical ventilation of preterm neonates with acute respiratory distress is extremely beneficial as it improves oxygenation and is associated with a very low incidence of pneumothorax. We have assessed which form of ventilation: patient triggered ventilation (PTV) or high frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) is most successful in provoking this beneficial respiratory interaction, synchrony. Preterm infants of less than 4 hours of age and gestational age greater than or equal to 27 weeks were entered into a randomised controlled trial. Thirteen patients received PTV, median gestational age 30 weeks (range 27-36) and 36 HFPPV, median gestational age, 29 weeks (range 27-40). HFPPV was delivered by Sechrist ventilators at rates between 61 and 120 breaths/minute. Patient triggered ventilation was delivered by an SLE ventilator and an airway pressure trigger was used. Inflation times during PTV were between 0.2 and 0.45 seconds. HFPPV provoked synchrony which persisted until extubation in 25 patients, but PTV provoked persistent synchrony only in four patients (p less than 0.05). No infant developed a pneumothorax. Eleven of 36 patients became asynchronous on HFPPV and 5 of 13 on PTV. In addition, four patients on PTV developed recurrent apnoea with deteriorating blood gases. Thus, 11 of 36 patients on HFPPV and 9 of 13 on PTV required transfer to conventional ventilation (p less than 0.05). Transfer occurred at a median of 30 hours (range 6-84) on HFPPV and 1 hour (range 1-25) on PTV, p less than 0.01. Infants who required transfer from the randomised mode of ventilation required a longer period of intubation (median 174 hours, range 30-2928) compared to 38 hours (range 1.5-456) for successful cases, regardless of randomisation (p less than 0.01). This study demonstrates PTV is significantly less successful in promoting synchrony than HFPPV. We therefore conclude HFPPV is a more useful form of respiratory support than PTV for preterm infants with acute respiratory distress.
authors.affiliation: Department of Child Health, King's College Hospital, London, England.
authors.forename: M F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Hird
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Greenough
mesh_terms: D006612:High-Frequency Ventilation; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007234:Infant, Premature; D012121:Respiration, Artificial; D012127:Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn / Q000628:therapy*; D012646:Self Administration