[Effects of dentin bonding agents on the proximal margins of ceramic inlays].
Ceramic inlays have shown good marginal seal as long as the margins of the cavities are located in enamel. The purpose of this study was to investigate the marginal seal of ceramic inlays with the cervical margins situated in dentin and to determine the effectiveness of dentin bonding agents. Sintered ceramic inlays were adhesively luted either without dentin bonding agents or with the use of Gluma or Miragebond. After thermocycling and incubation in a colored dye the penetration depth of the dye was measured on sequential sections. The used dentin bonding agents did not improve marginal seal. The glass ionomer cement base was able to prevent further penetration in most of the cases when deep leakage occurred. Unless a tight marginal seal in dentin can be achieved, the indication for adhesively luted inlays must be limited to cavities with margins located in enamel.
Kostka
E C
EC
FU Berlin, Abt. Zahnerhaltung Nord.
Noack
M J
MJ
Blunck
U
U
Roulet
J F
JF
D002516:Ceramics; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation; D003763:Dental Leakage / Q000517:prevention & control; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods*; D003804:Dentin; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D005976:Glutaral; D006801:Humans; D007284:Inlays; D008689:Methacrylates; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids
C047475:Dicor ceramic; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D008689:Methacrylates; C070605:Mirage-Bond; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids; D003776:Dental Porcelain; C044372:Gluma; D005976:Glutaral
Einfluss von Dentinhaftmitteln auf den approximalen Randschluss keramischer Inlays.