[Success of implantation depending on the type of prosthetic superstructure].
53 patients with 120 endosseous implants could be re-evaluated after a mean period of 2.7 years (maximum 5 years). Using casts from the upper with transfer posts and lower jaw, we measured the deviation of the implant axes from their ideal direction and localisation. Furthermore, we tried to find out, whether an unfavourable localisation compromised the prognosis of osseointegrated implants. Ideal, axial load by the prosthetic construction was often impossible because of unfavourable localisation of the implants. In a rank correlation analysis we found a significant influence of unfavourable localisation on prognosis in the group of hinge bars. Further weak correlations were revealed between loss of attachment and gingiva index which in turn was correlated with the plaque index.
Rammelsberg
P
P
Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik der Universität Regensburg.
Pospiech
P
P
Gernet
W
W
Hurt
G
G
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002648:Child; D003758:Dental Implantation, Endosseous; D015921:Dental Implants; D003774:Dental Plaque Index; D003779:Denture Design; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016348:Osseointegration; D010512:Periodontal Index; D011379:Prognosis
D015921:Dental Implants
Implantationserfolg in Abhängigkeit von der prothetischen Suprakonstruktion.