Dot counting by brain damaged subjects.
In this study, we examine how brain damaged adults (aphasics, right-brain lesioned subjects (RBD), and demented subjects) perform a basic education skill: determining the cardinality of different sets of objects (dots). The RBD subjects encountered more difficulty with the spatial correspondence components of the task (correct pointing to the dots), while the aphasics experienced more difficulty with the verbal components (the production of the correct number-word sequence). The deficit evidenced by the demented patients was less systematic. However, qualitative analyses of patients' behavior suggested an organization that tended to minimize the impact of their cognitive deficits on the object-counting task, and an analysis of their counting indicates that the basic counting principles proposed by Gelman (1982) and Fuson (1988) may be preserved.
Seron
X
X
Unité de Neuropsychologie Expérimentale de l'Adulte (NECO), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Deloche
G
G
Ferrand
I
I
Cornet
J A
JA
Frederix
M
M
Hirsbrunner
T
T
D001037:Aphasia / Q000523:psychology*; D001925:Brain Damage, Chronic / Q000523:psychology*; D003072:Cognition Disorders / Q000523:psychology*; D003704:Dementia / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011340:Problem Solving; D013028:Space Perception; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis