Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment.
Recent research on contingency judgment indicates that the judged predictiveness of a cue is dependent on the predictive strengths of other cues. Two classes of models correctly predict such cue interaction: associative models and statistical models. However, these models differ in their predictions about the effect of trial order on cue interaction. In five experiments reported here, college students viewed trial-by-trial data regarding several medical symptoms and a disease, judging the predictive strength of each symptom with respect to the disease. The results indicate that trial order influences the manner in which cues interact, but that neither the associative nor the statistical models can fully account for the data pattern. A possible variation of an associative account is discussed.
Chapman
G B
GB
Department of Decision Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6366.
D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012044:Regression Analysis