Concordance of indirect methods for the detection of lactose malabsorption in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects.
In order to collect data on (1) the prevalence of lactose malabsorption and (2) the value of indirect diagnostic methods for hypolactasia in diabetics, we compared lactose tolerance tests using serum glucose, serum galactose (after oral ethanol intake) and breath hydrogen excretion as diagnostic cutoff in 144 nondiabetic and 46 diabetic subjects. A good rate of concordance was found for the hydrogen breath test and galactose-dependent lactose tolerance test. The glucose-dependent lactose tolerance test was found to be of satisfactory diagnostic value in nondiabetic subjects and was useless for diagnostic purposes in diabetics. Lactose malabsorption was no more frequent in diabetics than in controls and lactose intolerance was found to be less frequent in the diabetic group. A distinction between hypolactasia and other gastrointestinal disorders in diabetics is possible by ambulatory indirect tests.
Lerch
M M
MM
Department of Internal Medicine III, Medizinische Fakultät, Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule, Aachen, BRD.
Rieband
H C
HC
Feldberg
W
W
Matern
S
S
D000328:Adult; D001786:Blood Glucose / Q000032:analysis; D001944:Breath Tests; D048909:Diabetes Complications; D005260:Female; D005690:Galactose / Q000032:analysis; D006801:Humans; D006859:Hydrogen / Q000032:analysis; D007787:Lactose Intolerance / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology; D007789:Lactose Tolerance Test; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015995:Prevalence
D001786:Blood Glucose; D006859:Hydrogen; D005690:Galactose