Interim analysis in clinical trials.
The early development of experimental design discouraged a sequential approach to the analysis of data, yet this seems a natural form of scientific enquiry. Clinical trial investigators should continuously monitor the quality of their techniques, but will often wish to delegate data monitoring to an independent group. The history and functions of data monitoring committees (DMCs) are reviewed. DMCs come in many shapes and sizes. They will need to consider many aspects of the data before making recommendations to the investigators, who have ultimate responsibility for early termination or protocol changes. Statistical issues form part of the assessment, and will involve management, safety and efficacy. Two broad approaches to early stopping are (i) the demonstration of strong evidence that a treatment effect falls above or below some critical value (not necessarily zero); (ii) stochastic curtailment based on prediction of final results. The latter is examined somewhat critically. Most trials will involve group sequential analyses at discrete time points. The effect of repeated data inspection on (i) is well known, although its relevance is debatable. Bayesian and likelihood methods do not entirely remove the difficulty.
Armitage
P
P
Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, U.K.
D001499:Bayes Theorem; D015982:Bias; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D012107:Research Design