Quantitative in vivo evaluation of four restorative concepts for mixed Class V restorations.
This study was performed in vivo over a 6-month period to assess restorative margins in Class V restorations placed with different techniques. The margins were evaluated quantitatively under the scanning electron microscope using the replica technique. Results indicated that the sandwich technique using a glass-ionomer cement base and a composite resin restoration was not able to prevent marginal gaps in dentin. However, the experimental Gluma/Clearfil system resulted in a quality of dentinal margins not statistically significantly different from that of enamel margins. These in vivo findings substantiate in vitro results.
Krejci
I
I
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zurich.
Lutz
F
F
Loher
C E
CE
D000269:Adhesives; D003188:Composite Resins; D001840:Dental Bonding / Q000379:methods*; D003736:Dental Cavity Lining; D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation; D003738:Dental Cements; D003743:Dental Enamel; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods*; D003804:Dentin; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D006801:Humans
D000269:Adhesives; D003188:Composite Resins; D003738:Dental Cements; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements