title: MCMI-II report style and bias: profile and validity scales analyses.
abstract: This study examines the behavior of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II (MCMI-II) in the face of various response styles and biases. The profiles and validity configurations of eight different test-taking styles were analyzed. Four hundred MCMI-II inventories (50 for each of the following categories) were administered or generated to produce the following: (a) normal endorsement by subjects, (b) fake good for administrative reasons, (c) fake good for clinical reasons, (d) fake bad administratively, (e) fake bad clinically, (f) 50% true/50% false computer generated, (g) 95% true computer generated, and (h) 95% false computer generated. Good statistical and clinically relevant separation of the profiles was found for normal, fake good, fake bad, and the randomly generated profiles with 44% of the variance predicted. The percentage of profiles identified by validity scales, however, was modest.
authors.affiliation: University of Northern Colorado, Greeley.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Retzlaff
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Sheehan
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Fiel
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D008192:Deception; D005260:Female; D006760:Hospitalization; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010554:Personality Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D010555:Personality Inventory / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012016:Reference Values; D012650:Self Disclosure