Measuring body fat: calibrating the rulers. Intermethod comparisons in 389 normal Caucasian subjects.
A systematic study of 389 normal Caucasians stratified for sex and age compared all of the traditional methods for measuring fat: body water, underwater weighing, body potassium, and anthropometrics and the newer methods of dual-photon absorptiometry, bioimpedance analysis, and total body electrical conductivity. Measurements by all methods are highly intercorrelated, but methods differences show the population means for fat percent to range from 26 to 35% of body weight across eight methods. All methods show increasing fat (as % body weight) with age in both sexes but vary in secular slope. The goal of this report is to provide direct translations between each of the eight methods. Intermethod comparison equations are given as simple linear regressions by using each method both as dependent and independent variable for each sex, permitting translation for results by any method to any other.
Pierson
R N
RN
Body Composition Unit, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10025.
Wang
J
J
Heymsfield
S B
SB
Russell-Aulet
M
M
Mazariegos
M
M
Tierney
M
M
Smith
R
R
Thornton
J C
JC
Kehayias
J
J
Weber
D A
DA
D000273:Adipose Tissue; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001823:Body Composition; D002138:Calibration; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008722:Methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D012016:Reference Values; D012044:Regression Analysis