[Treatment of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmia with amiodarone: comparison of empirical administration and administration guided by Holter or ventricular stimulation. Results of the parallel test].
To assess the most appropriate method of administering amiodarone and predicting its efficacy (empiric vs guided by Holter or by ventricular stimulation), 19 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation underwent a "parallel study". Fifteen patients were men and 4 women, with a mean age of 65 years. A coronary artery disease with previous myocardial infarction was present in 15 patients, dilated cardiomyopathy in 3 and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia in 1 (mean left ventricular ejection fraction = 35%). All 19 patients had, as inclusion criteria, 1) frequent (greater than or equal to 30/hour) and/or repetitive (greater than or equal to 10/24 hours) ventricular premature beats during 24-hour Holter monitoring and 2) inducible sustained (greater than 30/sec) ventricular arrhythmias during programmed ventricular stimulation (1-3 extrastimuli from 2 right ventricular sites). Amiodarone was given at an initial dosage of 15 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks and then at a dosage of 5 mg/kg/day. After 15 days 24-hour Holter monitoring and programmed ventricular stimulation were repeated. The data of these tests, however, were not used to guide the therapy that remained empiric, but served only to assess retrospectively the predictive value of Holter monitoring and ventricular stimulation. The following main results were obtained: The mean duration of follow-up was 25 +/- 13 months. During this period 6 patients (32%) died, 3 from sudden and 3 from non-sudden cardiac death. Two other patients had recurrence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias. After 15 days of therapy amiodarone was effective at Holter monitoring in 15 patients (79%) and not effective in 4 (21%). Two of the 15 patients considered responders died suddenly during the follow-up and 2 had arrhythmic recurrence, vs 1 of the 4 non-responder patients who died suddenly (negative predictive value of Holter monitoring: 73%; positive predictive value: 25%; predictive accuracy: 63%). After 15 days of therapy amiodarone was effective at ventricular stimulation in 10 patients (53%) and not effective in 9 (47%). None of the 10 patients considered responders had arrhythmic events during the follow-up, vs 5 of the 9 non-responders, 3 of whom died suddenly and 2 of whom had arrhythmic recurrences (negative predictive value of ventricular stimulation: 100%; positive predictive value: 56%; predictive accuracy: 79%). Only 1 patient discontinued amiodarone after 25 months of follow-up because of development of an important blue-grey skin discoloration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Raviele
A
A
Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale Umberto I, Mestre Venezia.
Di Pede
F
F
Gasparini
G
G
Zanocco
A
A
Delise
P
P
Bonso
A
A
D'Este
D
D
Piccolo
E
E
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000638:Amiodarone / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D002304:Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; D015716:Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006352:Heart Ventricles; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013610:Tachycardia / Q000188:drug therapy*; D013997:Time Factors; D014693:Ventricular Fibrillation / Q000188:drug therapy*
D000638:Amiodarone
Trattamento delle tachiaritmie ventricolari maligne con amiodarone: confronto tra somministrazione empirica e somministrazione guidata da Holter o da stimolazione ventricolare. Risultati del test parallelo.