Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of protective sleeve pulmonary artery catheters.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the clinical utility of protective sleeves in pulmonary artery (PA) balloon flotation catheters.


METHODS
Prospective, randomized trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.


METHODS
A general adult ICU in a community teaching hospital.


METHODS
All patients receiving PA balloon flotation catheters over a 1-yr period.


METHODS
Groups 1 and 2 received PA catheters with and without protective sleeves, respectively. Indications for catheter changes, other than catheter malposition, were the same for both groups.


RESULTS
In group 1, 54 patients received 71 catheters and four catheters were replaced due to the inability to obtain a PA occlusion pressure (PAOP) tracing. In group 2, 48 patients received 66 catheters, 11 of which were inserted due to failure to obtain a PAOP (p less than .05). PA catheters were repositioned successfully in 37/56 attempts in group 1, compared with 8/20 attempts in group 2 (p less than .05). There was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups. Even at the increased cost of the protective sleeves and introducer ($7/kit), for 100 catheter insertions, we project a direct cost savings of $742, and personnel time savings of 10.5 hrs for physicians, 14 hrs for nurses, and 4.7 hrs for radiology technicians.


CONCLUSIONS
Protective sleeves on PA catheters are safe, effective, cost-saving devices for ICU patients.
Bilen
Z
Z
Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, NY.
Weinberg
P F
PF
Gowani
Y
Y
Cohen
I L
IL
Socaris
S
S
Fein
I A
IA
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002404:Catheterization / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics / Q000295:instrumentation*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011651:Pulmonary Artery; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical