Increased nasal resistance induced by the pressure-flow technique and its effect on pressure and airflow during speech.
Although the validity of the pressure-flow technique has been verified in a number of laboratories, some questions still remain. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the procedures involved in estimating orifice size affect the pressure and airflow variables being measured. Twenty subjects with demonstrated velopharyngeal inadequacy on pressure-flow testing (VPO greater than or equal to 0.10 cm2) were assessed under two contrasting conditions. Subjects were asked to produce (p) in the word "hamper" with a) one nostril occluded by a cork as in pressure-flow testing and b) both nostrils patent. The results indicate that the increased nasal resistance resulting from occlusion of one nostril does not appreciably affect pressure and airflow associated with plosive consonant production in patients with velopharyngeal inadequacy.
Liu
H
H
Dental Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599.
Warren
D W
DW
Dalston
R M
RM
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000403:Airway Resistance / Q000502:physiology*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D002972:Cleft Palate / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009055:Mouth / Q000503:physiopathology; D009666:Nose / Q000503:physiopathology*; D010160:Palate, Soft / Q000503:physiopathology; D010614:Pharynx / Q000503:physiopathology; D010700:Phonetics; D011312:Pressure; D012123:Pulmonary Ventilation / Q000502:physiology*; D013060:Speech / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D014160:Transducers, Pressure; D014681:Velopharyngeal Insufficiency / Q000503:physiopathology*