title: Palliation and life quality in lung cancer; how good are clinicians at judging treatment outcome?
abstract: A recent trial by the MRC Lung Cancer Working Party used physician assessments to compare two palliative schedules of radiotherapy in lung cancer. A prospective study has been undertaken on a subset of these trial patients to see how physician assessments of symptomatic relief and general condition correlate with patient perception of therapeutic response. In 40 patients followed up monthly from presentation until close to death, good agreement was found between doctors and patients on change in specific physical symptoms and overall physical condition. Doctors were poor judges of life quality at presentation but appeared able to identify relative improvement or deterioration in overall quality of life. In conclusion, physician assessments may constitute valid end-points for radiotherapy trials comparing palliative schedules in lung cancer.
authors.affiliation: Academic Radiotherapy Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Regan
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Yarnold
authors.forename: P W
authors.initials: PW
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: N T
authors.initials: NT
authors.lastname: Cooke
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001294:Attitude to Health; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology* / Q000532:radiotherapy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011788:Quality of Life