Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
In three experiments, subjects learned two lists under incidental conditions and were then given either a part-word or a word (extralist associate) cue. Each cue was related to one word in each list. Half the subjects were given production instructions (an indirect memory test), and half were given cued recall instructions (a direct memory test). When the interval between List 2 and the test was shortened, recency effects were found for part-word cues for both cued recall and production instructions. Little or no recency effects were found with word cues. These results are incompatible with a simple distinction between the types of memory trace or information that are tapped by direct as opposed to indirect memory tasks. Possible causes for the recency effect and for the difference between word and part-word cues are discussed.
McKenzie
W A
WA
University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.
Humphreys
M S
MS
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D010700:Phonetics; D012660:Semantics