Urine screen for bacteriuria in symptomatic pediatric outpatients.
A retrospective review of 1019 symptomatic pediatric outpatients compared urine dipstick including leukocyte esterase and nitrite to semiquantitative Gram-stained smear of uncentrifuged urine for the identification of specimens that contained greater than or equal to 10(5) organisms/ml as determined by semiquantitative urine cultures. The Gram-stained smear was slightly more sensitive than the dipstick; 97.6% (any microorganisms seen or greater than or equal to 2 organisms/oil immersion field) vs. 90.2% (either leukocyte esterase- or nitrite-positive). The negative predictive value of both screening methods was excellent (99.9 and 99.6%, respectively). The predictive value of a positive screen was low for both methods although the predictive value of a positive screen of the Gram-stained smear did reach 63% when there were greater than or equal to 5 organisms/oil immersion field. Neither method of urine screen should substitute for a urine culture in the symptomatic outpatient. However, the urine dipstick test is a reasonable alternative to a Gram-stained smear for initial patient assessment.
Weinberg
A G
AG
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-9072.
Gan
V N
VN
D015373:Bacterial Typing Techniques; D001437:Bacteriuria / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000652:urine; D002265:Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases / Q000652:urine; D002648:Child; D015169:Colony Count, Microbial; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening; D009573:Nitrites / Q000652:urine; D010045:Outpatients; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016482:Urinalysis / Q000379:methods*; D014556:Urine / Q000382:microbiology
D009573:Nitrites; C021443:leukocyte esterase; D002265:Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases