Comments on "the Rorschach M response: a return to its roots".
These comments address three interrelated issues posed in Kramer's article concerning Rorschach's definition of the M response and the criteria for M that is applied in the Comprehensive System, the possibility that M may be overscored by the criteria for the Comprehensive System, and the issue of whether the Rorschach is amenable to quantification and empirical scrutiny. Kramer has oversimplified and misconstrued statements by Rorschach, Beck, and Bohm; in reality, the criterion for the scoring of M responses in the Comprehensive System differs very little, if at all, from that suggested by Rorschach. The accumulated history of the test seems to confirm that it is amenable to quantification and empirical scrutiny.
Exner
J E
JE
Rorschach Workshops, Asheville, NC 28815-9010.
D006801:Humans; D007699:Kinesthesis; D009039:Motion Perception; D011594:Psychometrics; D012392:Rorschach Test / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014473:Unconscious, Psychology