Response bias in a case-control study: analysis utilizing comparative data concerning legal abortions from two independent Swedish studies.
Independent reports of legal abortions in two Swedish epidemiologic studies of breast cancer in young women, covering the same women and overlapping the same time period, have been compared in order to estimate a putative response bias. One study used case-control methods and obtained data by retrospective interviews from 317 cases and 512 controls. The other study was based on objectively documented information froma nationwide registry covering legally induced abortions. Analysis demonstrated a ratio between the odds ratios from the two studies of 1.5 (95 percent confidence interval 1.1-2.1) and an observed ratio of 22.4 (p less than 0.007) between underreporting of previous induced abortions among controls relative to overreporting among cases. This response bias may explain the tendency toward increased risk of breast cancer which, according to several case-control studies, appears to be associated with induced abortion.
Lindefors-Harris
B M
BM
Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Radiumhemmet, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eklund
G
G
Adami
H O
HO
Meirik
O
O
D000029:Abortion, Legal / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D000328:Adult; D015982:Bias; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D008498:Medical Record Linkage; D012042:Registries / Q000592:standards*; D013548:Sweden