Bronchoscopy in North America: the ACCP survey.
A mail survey of this type has several inherent drawbacks. First, answers to some of the questions, particularly those pertaining to complication rates, rely on the memory of participants. Second, the wording of certain questions may have imparted different meanings. Third, the format of the questionnaire may have confused some. Fourth, one cannot expect that all questionnaires will be answered fully. Fifth, as indicated by several respondents, several important topics (eg, topical anesthetic agents and mode of their delivery, prophylaxis against infective endocarditis, tracheobronchial stent placement, endobronchial intraluminal radiotherapy) were not included. Many respondents suggested inclusion of these and other questions in future surveys. Nevertheless, in the absence of any survey looking into a large number of bronchoscopy-related practices, mail surveys have the advantage of reflecting nationwide practice rather than results from selected centers, and this report provides some insight into bronchoscopy practices in North America. While the results indicate the present trends in bronchoscopy practices in North America, they do not establish or recommend any standards in bronchoscopy.
Prakash
U B
UB
Division of Thoracic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
Offord
K P
KP
Stubbs
S E
SE
D001999:Bronchoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003625:Data Collection; D006801:Humans; D014481:United States