Multidimensional scaling of painful and innocuous electrocutaneous stimuli: reliability and individual differences.
Multidimensional scaling was used to explore whether a single intensity dimension underlies the perception of both nonpainful and painful electrical stimuli, or whether separate dimensions are required. For the scaling (INDSCAL) procedure, 41 healthy volunteers judged the similarity between all pairs of 16 intensities, which ranged from imperceptible levels to pain tolerance. For the property mapping (PREFMAP) analysis, they rated each intensity on each of 16 property scales. INDSCAL revealed four dimensions that showed high levels of both test-retest and split-half reliability. The first dimension scaled stimuli from the lowest intensity to the pain threshold. This dimension was related to property scales of sensation, affect, and arousal, but not pain, suggesting a sensory magnitude dimension. The second dimension ordered the stimuli from mildly to severely painful and was related to the painful property scale, suggesting a pain intensity dimension. Third and fourth dimensions, which refined the scaling of nonpainful stimuli, were also found. Variability in the subjects' use of the painful and nonpainful dimensions was related to their choice of stimulus descriptors. Like clinical pain, laboratory pain requires multidimensional assessment.
Janal
M N
MN
New York State Psychiatric Institute, NY 10032.
Clark
W C
WC
Carroll
J D
JD
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010146:Pain / Q000523:psychology*; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011601:Psychophysics; D012684:Sensory Thresholds