title: Morphometry of bladder carcinoma: morphometry and grading complement each other.
abstract: Subjective grading of bladder carcinoma is a good predictor of the clinical outcome in those patients whose tumours are grade 1 or grade 3. However, in grade 2 tumours, which account for 45% of cases, grading has little predictive value in an individual patient. We have complemented the use of subjective grading with measurement of nuclear area and used a calculation of the distribution of nuclear sizes as a predictor of the clinical course. When subjective grading was complemented by morphometry the outcome was correctly predicted in 55 of 58 cases and all cases with poor clinical outcome were identified.
authors.affiliation: Histopathology Department, St Bartholomew's Hospital Medical College, West Smithfield, London, England.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Sowter
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Slavin
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Sowter
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Rosen
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Hendry
mesh_terms: D002295:Carcinoma, Transitional Cell / Q000473:pathology* / Q000648:ultrastructure; D002467:Cell Nucleus / Q000473:pathology; D006801:Humans; D011379:Prognosis; D001749:Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology* / Q000648:ultrastructure