title: Sharing of information by students in an objective structured clinical examination.
abstract: Increasing numbers of medical schools are using Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) to evaluate students. An Objective Structured Clinical Examination employs a multiple-station format and standardized patients to document students' clinical skills. A lengthy format is necessary; testing an entire class often necessitates multiple repetitions of the same examination. This dictates a need to minimize sharing of information among students. We studied six administrations of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination designed to measure skills. Analyses were conducted to detect changes in scores over the administrations as well as over the 8.5 hours of each day of testing. An increase in either might indicate information sharing had occurred. No significant increase occurred. If information was shared, it had no significant effect on scores. Skills a student uses to approach a patient should not change even if the patient's complaints are known.
authors.affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson 85724.
authors.forename: P J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Rutala
authors.forename: D B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Witzke
authors.forename: E O
authors.initials: EO
authors.lastname: Leko
authors.forename: J V
authors.initials: JV
authors.lastname: Fulginiti
authors.forename: P J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Taylor
mesh_terms: D002982:Clinical Clerkship; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards*; D003463:Cues; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012577:Schools, Medical; D013337:Students, Medical; D013997:Time Factors