title: The relative accuracies of two automated noninvasive arterial pressure measurement devices.
abstract: We compared the accuracies of two types of noninvasive blood pressure devices. Thirty-two patients requiring an intraarterial catheter for anesthetic management underwent simultaneous monitoring with Dinamap 1846SX and Ohmeda Finapres 3700 devices. For the first 10 minutes of recording, new Dinamap determinations were performed every 60 seconds; subsequent recordings were made at 3-minute intervals. Data were obtained at the time of new Dinamap readings, and twice between new readings to approximate the real-time performance of the two monitors. We defined superior accuracy as a statistically significant difference in mean absolute error greater than 5 mm Hg. With these criteria, pooled data from all patients revealed no difference in performance, even in real time. Pooled data can be misleading since there was a significant amount of variation in accuracy for both monitors. Therefore, we used nonparametric analysis to determine how many individual patients were monitored better by either device. When we compared only data from new Dinamap readings, the Finapres monitor showed superior performance for systolic readings in 13 patients, versus 6 patients for the Dinamap (P less than 0.05, chi-square test). Similar analysis for diastolic and mean pressure performance did not reach statistical significance. However, in real time, the Finapres unit monitored more patients more accurately for systolic (14 Finapres versus 3 Dinamap), diastolic (11 Finapres versus 3 Dinamap), and mean (10 Finapres versus 3 Dinamap) pressure determinations. The magnitude of these differences were, however, less dramatic than expected. This was probably due to stabilization of arterial pressure during the anesthetic, which minimized the error due to intermittent sampling. We conclude that continuous Finapres readings and new Dinamap determinations are equally accurate for diastolic and mean arterial pressures. The accuracy of Finapres appears to be slightly superior for systolic pressure. The intermittent sampling of oscillometric devices compromises their performance relative to the Finapres in many, but not all, cases.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
authors.forename: M S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Gorback
authors.forename: T J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Quill
authors.forename: M L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Lavine
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001794:Blood Pressure; D001795:Blood Pressure Determination / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D002406:Catheterization, Peripheral; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D008991:Monitoring, Physiologic