Three methods of developing MMPI taxonomies of sexual offenders.
In a sample of 261 state hospital sexual offenders, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) profiles did not differ for offenders with adult victims versus offenders with child victims when offender age was controlled. MMPI 2-point analyses for the whole sample revealed five common codes that were independent of victim maturity. The sample was randomly divided in half and subjected to a cluster-analytic procedure which revealed two MMPI clusters. The first cluster was unelevated, with Scale 4 as its high point. The second cluster had multiple elevations, with Scales 8, 4, 2, and 7 as the highest scales. These clusters were replicated in a cluster analysis of the second half of the sample. However, when the sample was recombined, the two clusters were not externally validated basis on demographic and criminological variables. The results suggest that common psychological variables among sexual offenders may have more discriminative value than victim maturity in developing sexual offender taxonomies.
Hall
G C
GC
Department of Psychology, Kent State University, OH 44242-0001.
Graham
J R
JR
Shepherd
J B
JB
D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D003134:Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008950:MMPI / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis*; D010262:Paraphilic Disorders / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis; D010552:Personality Assessment; D011594:Psychometrics; D012742:Sex Offenses / Q000145:classification / Q000523:psychology*