Substitutability between conditioned and primary reinforcers in discrimination acquisition.
Rats and pigeons were trained on a series of reversals of a conditional simultaneous discrimination. The percentage of reinforcement for correct trials was varied across reversals. When nonreinforced correct trials produced the same feedback as incorrect trials, the number of errors to reach an acquisition criterion was greater for smaller percentages of reinforcement, but the number of reinforcers required was either approximately constant or smaller for the smaller percentages. When a stimulus paired with food (the conditioned reinforcer) was added on nonreinforced correct trials, both measures were substantially decreased. When the same stimulus was presented, but without a history of food pairing, learning rate was similar to when no stimulus was presented on nonreinforced trials. The results provide direct evidence that conditioned reinforcers may substitute, although imperfectly, for a primary reinforcer, and that pairing with the primary reinforcer is a necessary condition for such substitutability to occur.
Williams
B A
BA
Department of Psychology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla 92093.
Dunn
R
R
D000818:Animals; D001070:Appetitive Behavior; D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D010856:Columbidae; D003216:Conditioning, Operant; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D051381:Rats; D011919:Rats, Inbred Strains; D012193:Reversal Learning; D012691:Serial Learning