title: Comparative study of computer-based and standard clinical accommodative facility testing methods.
abstract: Two methods for assessing accommodative facility were compared: the Computer Orthoptics Diagnostic Program and the standard Lens Flipper Method. In random fashion, 40 visually normal [modified clinical technique (MCT) screening] subjects, ages 10 to 18 years, were tested monocularly and binocularly on both methods. Scatter-plot comparisons of the data showed no apparent relation between the two methods, with correlation coefficients close to zero for both monocular (r = 0.0205) and binocular (r = 0.1180) results. In addition, the subject's diagnostic classification (pass or fail) was compared between the two methods. The kappa statistic indicated a low level of agreement between the two methods both monocularly and binocularly. These results suggest that the Computer Orthoptics' diagnostic test is not a valid method for diagnosing accommodative facility deficiencies.
authors.affiliation: Southern California College of Optometry, Fullerton.
authors.forename: M W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Rouse
authors.forename: G M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Freestone
authors.forename: B A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Weiner
authors.forename: P N
authors.initials: PN
authors.lastname: De Land
mesh_terms: D000065:Accommodation, Ocular; D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D003936:Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011897:Random Allocation; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014787:Vision Tests / Q000592:standards*; D015348:Vision, Binocular; D015349:Vision, Monocular