title: Comparison of two methods of contrast sensitivity assessment with young and elderly adults.
abstract: The sensitivity of the neural channels which process spatial frequency information may be assessed by determining the threshold contrast for a range of spatial frequencies. The stability and reliability of two methods of assessment, von Bekesy tracking and increasing contrast, were examined over 4 sessions with a sample of 12 young and 12 elderly adults. The stimuli were presented as either a static display or in counterphase at a rate of 7.5 Hz. The method of increasing contrast proved to be the more stable and reliable of the two methods. Given the superior psychometric properties of this method and its ease of administration, the method of increasing contrast is recommended as a rapid and reliable screening tool. It should be of particular use for spatial contrast sensitivity assessment of patients who have a limited attention span.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
authors.forename: G C
authors.initials: GC
authors.lastname: Gilmore
authors.forename: C G
authors.initials: CG
authors.lastname: Andrist
authors.forename: F L
authors.initials: FL
authors.lastname: Royer
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000375:Aging; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D011601:Psychophysics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014787:Vision Tests / Q000379:methods*