title: Evaluation of the carotid artery bifurcation: comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction arch aortography.
abstract: Thirty-four carotid artery bifurcations were examined using both magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction arch aortography to determine their accuracy when compared to selective carotid angiography. The sensitivity of MRA was 73% and its specificity was 91% when compared with selective carotid angiography. The sensitivity of arch aortography was 27% and its specificity was 100%.
authors.affiliation: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York.
authors.forename: D K
authors.initials: DK
authors.lastname: Kido
authors.forename: J B
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Barsotti
authors.forename: L Z
authors.initials: LZ
authors.lastname: Rice
authors.forename: B M
authors.initials: BM
authors.lastname: Rothenberg
authors.forename: R J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Panzer
authors.forename: S P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Souza
authors.forename: C L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Dumoulin
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015901:Angiography, Digital Subtraction; D001027:Aortography; D001161:Arteriosclerosis / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D002339:Carotid Arteries / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology*; D002340:Carotid Artery Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D003951:Diagnostic Errors; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity