title: Can recognition of living things be selectively impaired?
abstract: Brain damage sometimes seems to impair recognition of living things, despite relatively preserved recognition of nonliving things. The most straightforward interpretation of this dissociation is that the recognition of living things depends on some specialized mechanisms that are not needed for the recognition of nonliving things. However, there are alternative interpretations of the dissociation in terms of the greater complexity or inter-item similarity of living things, or the more specific, within-category identifications that are usually required for living things. Surprisingly, the relevant tests to discriminate among these rival hypotheses have never been performed. We took the factors of visual complexity, inter-item similarity, specificity of identification, as well as others, into account in analyzing the visual recognition performance of two head-injured visual agnosic patients. In each case we found that recognition of living things was still disproportionately impaired when the effects of the other factors were accounted for.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Farah
authors.forename: P A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: McMullen
authors.forename: M M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Meyer
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000377:Agnosia / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000523:psychology; D000849:Anomia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000523:psychology; D001925:Brain Damage, Chronic / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000523:psychology; D003210:Concept Formation / Q000502:physiology*; D004193:Discrimination Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D004292:Dominance, Cerebral / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*