title: The reliability of abuse history reports: a comparison of two inquiry formats.
abstract: We compared patients' reports about histories of physical or sexual abuse in two independent formats: the standard psychiatric intake interview at admission for inpatient treatment, and a subsequent confidential self-report survey about various forms of early childhood trauma. For 92 consecutively admitted female patients, nearly all reports of abuse histories obtained in the intake interview were consistent with later reports obtained in the survey. However, findings of no abuse history obtained in the intake format were frequently inconsistent with reports obtained in the survey, which were twice as frequent as intake reports. Gender of the intake interviewer was not related to reporting. These data suggest caution in accepting at face value initial denials of abuse histories.
authors.affiliation: Evaluative Service Unit, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA 02178.
authors.forename: D L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Dill
authors.forename: J A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Chu
authors.forename: M C
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Grob
authors.forename: S V
authors.initials: SV
authors.lastname: Eisen
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D002649:Child Abuse / Q000175:diagnosis*; D002650:Child Abuse, Sexual / Q000175:diagnosis*; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008487:Medical History Taking; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000523:psychology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010343:Patient Admission; D010555:Personality Inventory; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires