Hemodynamic effects of different ventilatory patterns. A prospective clinical trial.
We compared the hemodynamic effects of three different ventilatory patterns including two variations of the I:E ratio (2:1 and 3:1) and a PEEP-pattern with the MAWP being equal in all three patterns. The study was performed on 15 patients without lung or cardiovascular disease who were ventilated after elective abdominal surgery. Each of the patients was subjected to the three different pressure wave curves. The IPPV served as control. Hemodynamic measurements included TEE registration of the LV cross-sectional areas, diameters and wall thickness as well as arterial blood pressure and heart rate. As a result, we found no significant differences in the hemodynamic effects of all three patterns. Compared with IPPV, they showed a reduction of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, LV dimensions and systolic wall stress. Assessed with the end systolic quotient, LV contractility remained constant.
Goertz
A
A
Department of Anesthesia, University of Ulm, Germany.
Heinrich
H
H
Winter
H
H
Deller
A
A
D000005:Abdomen / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006439:Hemodynamics / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007385:Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011175:Positive-Pressure Respiration; D011182:Postoperative Care; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012121:Respiration, Artificial / Q000379:methods*