The effects of false response feedback on human 'fear' conditioning.
This study describes a human electrodermal conditioning experiment in which subjects were given false skin conductance feedback during CS presentation. In comparison with appropriate attentional control groups, subjects who believed they were exhibiting a strong CR did actually emit a greater magnitude CR, while subjects who believed they were exhibiting only a weak CR emitted a significantly lower magnitude CR. When both self-report and behavioural measures of UCS revaluation were taken after conditioning, the evidence suggested that response feedback had not differentially affected subjects evaluation of the aversiveness of the UCS. The results suggest that the response modulating effects of response feedback observed in this and other studies are not caused by response feedback influencing evaluation of the UCS, but they are consistent with the hypothesis that beliefs about the nature of response feedback influence the strength of the UCS representation itself.
Russell
C
C
Department of Social Sciences, City University, London, England.
Davey
G C
GC
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D005239:Fear; D005246:Feedback; D005260:Female; D005712:Galvanic Skin Response; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male