title: Ethics in research.
abstract: Unethical conduct in research can be divided into five categories: 1) falsification of data, in which the researcher manipulates results, provides data without experimentation, or biases the results to give a false impression of their value; 2) failure to credit others (former colleagues, students, associates) for research results or ideas; 3) plagiarism, use of other's published material (ideas, graphs, or tabular data) without permission or credit; 4) conflicts of commitment or interest in which work or ownership in a private firm in some way conflicts or detracts from the duties to the institution they represent or allows private gain through the individual's employment at the institution; 5) biased experimental design or interpretation of data to support public or private groups that have provided financial support for research. Although none of these should be condoned or tolerated by the scientific community, the latter two are probably more serious, because they are insidious, hard to prove, and, in the long run, result in the loss of public confidence in science.
authors.affiliation: Department of Poultry Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802.
authors.forename: H S
authors.initials: HS
authors.lastname: Siegel
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture; D000818:Animals; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000592:standards; D015714:Plagiarism; D012106:Research / Q000592:standards*; D015871:Scientific Misconduct; D015983:Selection Bias