title: Plasmapheresis does not increase the risk for infection in immunosuppressed patients with severe lupus nephritis. The Lupus Nephritis Collaborative Study Group.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine whether plasmapheresis increases the risk for infection in immunosuppressed patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomized, controlled trial.
  
  
  METHODS
  Multicenter.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eighty-six patients enrolled in a trial of plasmapheresis for severe diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis.
  
  
  METHODS
  Forty-six of the patients received high-dose steroid therapy plus cyclophosphamide therapy for 8 weeks. Thereafter, cyclophosphamide therapy was discontinued, and steroid therapy was tapered (standard treatment group). Forty patients received identical treatment and had 12 plasmapheresis procedures during the first 4 weeks of the treatment.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients were examined for the development of infection.
  
  
  RESULTS
  No statistical difference in age, sex, race, serum creatinine level, proteinuria, or complement levels was found between the two groups. Over a follow-up period of 5376 patient-weeks, 74% of patients in the standard treatment group had 62 infections, yielding an aggregate infection rate of 1.15 infections per 100 weeks (median individual infection rate, 1.08; 25th and 75th percentiles, 0.0 and 2.44). This rate was comparable to that seen in the plasmapheresis-treated patients who were followed for 4187 patient-weeks: 68% had 51 infections, for an aggregate infection rate of 1.22 infections per 100 weeks (median individual infection rate, 0.94; 25th and 75th percentiles, 0.0 and 2.32). The infection rate was also comparable in the initial acute phase of the study, despite the fact that patients who received plasmapheresis then had significantly lower immunoglobulin (IgG) levels (P less than 0.001). Neither the site (superficial compared with systemic) nor the nature (conventional compared with unconventional) of infection differed statistically between the two groups. Of 14 patient deaths, 7 were from infection (4 in control group and 3 in the plasmapheresis group).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Plasmapheresis did not increase the risk for infection in immunosuppressed patients with severe lupus nephritis.
authors.affiliation: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio.
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Pohl
authors.forename: S P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Lan
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Berl
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002423:Cause of Death; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D003520:Cyclophosphamide / Q000009:adverse effects; D004198:Disease Susceptibility / Q000276:immunology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007166:Immunosuppressive Agents / Q000009:adverse effects*; D008181:Lupus Nephritis / Q000628:therapy*; D008297:Male; D009894:Opportunistic Infections / Q000209:etiology* / Q000401:mortality; D010956:Plasmapheresis / Q000009:adverse effects*; D011241:Prednisone / Q000009:adverse effects; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors
chemical_list: D007166:Immunosuppressive Agents; D003520:Cyclophosphamide; D011241:Prednisone