A clinical evaluation of materials used in registering interjaw relationships.
Three recording media used to relate stone casts for 15 dentate patients were compared for accuracy. Interjaw relationships at the maximum intercuspation position and the retruded contact position were recorded using impression plaster, wax, and Duralay acrylic resin. A Lucia programming jig was used in the retruded contact position. The vertical distance and horizontal deviation between the casts were measured from reference points on the casts using each recording material. The average percentage differences between the recording materials were calculated. Hand articulation was the most accurate method of relating the casts at maximum intercuspation. The most accurate recording medium was impression plaster, followed by dental wax and Duralay resin at the maximum intercuspation and retruded contact positions.
Urstein
M
M
Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Fitzig
S
S
Moskona
D
D
Cardash
H S
HS
D000180:Acrylic Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D002133:Calcium Sulfate / Q000737:chemistry; D016302:Centric Relation; D003760:Dental Impression Materials / Q000737:chemistry; D003766:Dental Occlusion; D006801:Humans; D007574:Jaw Relation Record; D008768:Methylmethacrylates; D013499:Surface Properties; D014716:Vertical Dimension; D014885:Waxes / Q000737:chemistry
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D003760:Dental Impression Materials; D008768:Methylmethacrylates; D014885:Waxes; C034578:Duralay; D002133:Calcium Sulfate