Effect of cavity design on gap formation in Class II composite resin restorations.
Qhis study examined the width of the gap at the cervical wall in traditional cavity preparations or adhesive designs that were restored with various composite resins by different procedures. Fifty-four intact human molars were restored with several composite resins and their respective bonding agents. A rectangular cavity was prepared in one proximal surface and a spherical cavity was prepared in the other proximal surface. The composite resin Occlusin with the bonding agent recorded the least gap width compared with similar materials. The spherical cavity restorations recorded less gap width than the rectangular cavity restorations.
Douvitsas
G
G
Karolinska Institutet, School of Dentistry, Department of Dental Materials and Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
D000134:Acid Etching, Dental; D000179:Acrylates / Q000737:chemistry; D000180:Acrylic Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry*; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation; D003738:Dental Cements / Q000737:chemistry; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000145:classification / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D011140:Polyurethanes / Q000737:chemistry; D019279:Resin Cements; D013499:Surface Properties; D014520:Urethane / Q000737:chemistry
D000179:Acrylates; D000180:Acrylic Resins; C029012:Composite Dental Resin; D003188:Composite Resins; D003738:Dental Cements; D011140:Polyurethanes; D019279:Resin Cements; C056413:Occlusin; C048711:P-30 composite resin; D014520:Urethane; C040415:heliobond; C041330:Scotchbond