title: Gingival crown margin configurations: a review and discussion. Part I: Terminology and widths.
abstract: The terms bevel, chamfer, and shoulder are widely used to describe crown margin designs. However, as no clear definition of the essential feature(s) of each design has been universally accepted, the same term often describes margins of widely differing width and/or configuration. Similarly "bevel angles" are not consistently defined. While tradition favors the use of thinner marginal designs, many of the reasons advanced for their superiority are questionable in the light of contemporary research. Use of marginal widths beyond the absolute minimum demanded of the material may contribute to overcoming some of the persistent problems identified with fixed prosthodontic replacement of natural teeth. These include overcontour, porcelain debonds, poor esthetics, and fit. It is suggested that the problems associated with underpreparation and the potential advantages of wider preparations need reemphasis.
authors.forename: A J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Hunter
authors.forename: A R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Hunter
mesh_terms: D003442:Crowns; D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation; D003779:Denture Design; D005881:Gingiva; D006801:Humans; D013499:Surface Properties; D009626:Terminology as Topic