Physician reported incentives and disincentives for referring patients to hospice.
Previous research has affirmed the key role of the physician in the decision to use hospice. Yet at least 1/4 of the physicians who have the opportunity to discuss hospice with a terminally ill patient never do so, and those that do so are selective. The present study used a qualitative approach to investigate the factors considered by the physician when deciding to discuss hospice with a patient. Participants were 17 practicing physicians who had referred patients to the one certified hospice in the geographic area of the study. Data were gathered by means of semi-structured interviews, which were audiotaped and transcribed for thematic analysis. The final categorization of data divided themes along two dimensions: a content dimension and a second dimension called incentives and disincentives. It is proposed that the physician's proactive stance toward disclosure of the terminal diagnosis and perception of hospice as an opportunity for death with dignity create a culture within which the work that is necessary to make the other factors favorable toward use of hospice is accomplished.
Hyman
R B
RB
Bulkin
W
W
D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001293:Attitude to Death; D003142:Communication; D005260:Female; D006738:Hospices / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009042:Motivation; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology*; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000592:standards*