title: The Northwestern University Twin Study. XV: Rationales for a standard of care in compromised twin pregnancies.
abstract: Current antenatal technologies have improved the obstetrician's ability to assess fetal well-being as well as to diagnose fetal compromise. These technologies have given rise to very difficult ethical issues in the management of compromised twin pregnancies: for example, a choice must be made between putting a healthy twin at risk due to preterm delivery for the sake of a compromised cotwin or of allowing the compromised twin to die in order to buy time for the healthy twin. Though each case is unique, good medical practice requires a standard of care by which consistent patient management can be proposed. In the pluralistic environment of Northwestern Memorial Hospital, our staff has favored a standard of care based on patient autonomy. This approach demands: 1) a practitioner who offers a thorough explanation of the diagnosis and possible treatment approaches; 2) time for the patient and her partner to assimilate this information and test treatment options against their personal value system; 3) a third, but disinterested, party to facilitate patient understanding and value clarification; 4) a practitioner either willing to support the patient's decisions or refer her to another practitioner who will.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prentice Women's Hospital and Maternity Center, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois.
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Minogue
authors.forename: R K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Tamura
authors.forename: L G
authors.initials: LG
authors.lastname: Keith
mesh_terms: D004200:Diseases in Twins / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D010358:Patient Participation; D011247:Pregnancy; D011272:Pregnancy, Multiple; D011295:Prenatal Care / Q000592:standards*