[Physico-chemical properties of 4 endodontic sealing cements].
Four endodontic sealers were compared with two series of tests, in thin layer and in 10 mm long and 5 mm diameter rods. Under these conditions, the Pulp Canal Sealer showed the best ability to present a thin layer and the same flow than the Cortisomol. Its setting time was 15 minutes. Forty-eight hours later, the Sealite showed a very good tightness compared to the other sealers. At 30 days, the Pulp Canal Sealer and the OZn-Eugénol were the tightest ones. Less water was absorbed with the Cortisomal and the Sealite. Is there, for these sealers, any correlation between water-absorbtion and tightness?
Halimi
P
P
Camps
J
J
Roche
M
M
Proust
J P
JP
D000042:Absorption; D003738:Dental Cements / Q000737:chemistry*; D003763:Dental Leakage; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials / Q000737:chemistry*; D013997:Time Factors; D015035:Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement / Q000737:chemistry
D003738:Dental Cements; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials; D015035:Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement
Etude des propriétés physico-chimiques de quatre ciments de scellement endodontique.