The utility of verbal and behavioral assessments of value.
Subjects lived in a laboratory apartment for up to 30 days, engaging in ordinary activities such as reading, sewing, and artwork. The amount of time devoted to each activity was recorded and compared with periodic verbal ratings of the amount of time devoted to the activities. The verbal and observational assessments of the time distribution were very similar, but there were some discrepancies. Based on self-reports and on observation of time actually devoted to the activities, contingencies were arranged in which time devoted to one activity produced time available for a second activity. When the contingency relation was based on behavioral assessment, predictions of time redistribution were more accurate than when the relations were based on verbal assessment. The close correspondence between observed distributions of time and verbally assessed distributions was probably due to the well-specified situation and rigorous assessment methods. Contrary to some cognitive-behavioral accounts, the contingency results suggest that verbal assessment is not necessarily preferable to observation when the two make discrepant predictions. It is suggested that verbal reports might be used more often in behavior analysis in place of lengthy or difficult observations, and attention is drawn to a personality model that parallels important components of behavior analysis.
Bernstein
D J
DJ
University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68588-0308.
Michael
R L
RL
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D001290:Attitude; D002940:Circadian Rhythm; D005260:Female; D006686:Hobbies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012934:Social Isolation; D013998:Time Perception; D014705:Verbal Behavior