title: Total parenteral nutrition 1990. A review of its current status in hospitalised patients, and the need for patient-specific feeding.
abstract: The decision to initiate total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in hospitalised patients should be based on the presence of clinically significant starvation and dysfunction of the gastrointestinal tract. It must also take into account the clinical status of the patient, considering major treatment strategies and the need for prolonged hospitalisation, the benefits of feeding and the attendant risks of central venous alimentation. Recent evidence in surgical patients in intensive care provides the impetus for early parenteral feeding; withholding TPN and inducing a cumulative caloric deficit of greater than or equal to 10,000 calories has been associated with a survival disadvantage compared to those patients with a positive caloric balance. Moreover, the incidence of serious organ failure was consistently higher in the group with cumulative caloric deficits. Additional evidence favouring the provision of TPN exists, but the axiom 'if the gut works, use it' still prevails. Exceptions to this precept do exist, however, particularly in critically ill patients. The metabolic derangements encountered in these patients could be so severe that it may be impossible to correct the electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities via the enteral route. For example, such patients may have large potassium requirements and/or severe alkalaemia necessitating systemic acidification with hydrochloric acid, precluding enteral delivery due to gastrointestinal intolerance. In this setting, combined enteral feeding with 10 to 20 ml/h to maintain gut integrity (via a post-pyloric feeding tube) and TPN during the acute phases of illness is an exciting possibility. Once the decision to feed is made, the amount of nutrition prescribed may assume equal importance with respect to patient outcome. The frequent use of the Harris-Benedict equation, plus a multiplying factor for stress, may overestimate caloric requirements; this is particularly true during critical illness. The dangers of overfeeding may be just as harmful as not feeding at all. The use of indirect calorimetry provides the most accurate measurement of resting energy expenditure. However, in the absence of indirect calorimetry, modified equations to estimate caloric needs are available. Caution must be observed as caloric intakes exceeding the range of 25 to 35 kcal/kg may be dangerous, particularly in the severely ill patient with preexisting organ failure. The amount of protein and the 'calorie-mix' necessary for optimal nutritional support is open to debate. Recent evidence has demonstrated no additional benefit to nitrogen balance in severely septic patients when protein was given at a level exceeding 1.5 g/kg/day.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
authors.affiliation: Nutrition Support Service, New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston.
authors.forename: D F
authors.initials: DF
authors.lastname: Driscoll
authors.forename: G L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Blackburn
mesh_terms: D003422:Critical Care; D004040:Dietary Carbohydrates / Q000008:administration & dosage; D004041:Dietary Fats / Q000008:administration & dosage; D004044:Dietary Proteins / Q000008:administration & dosage; D006801:Humans; D010289:Parenteral Nutrition, Total / Q000009:adverse effects
chemical_list: D004040:Dietary Carbohydrates; D004041:Dietary Fats; D004044:Dietary Proteins