Evaluation of immunocytochemical detection methods of incorporated bromodeoxyuridine in hybridomas.
Bivariate distributions obtained from nominal acid hydrolysis or thermal treatment methods used in the cell cycle analysis of incorporated bromodeoxyuridine were shown to be unacceptable with hybridomas. Four different cell treatment and staining methods were compared. These methods are acid hydrolysis, thermal denaturation, nuclei extraction with pepsin digestion, and simultaneous pepsin digestion and acid hydrolysis. The nuclei extraction method was determined to be the most appropriate for the immunocytochemical staining of incorporated bromodeoxyuridine in hybridomas. The resulting bivariate distribution provides a clear distinction between labelled and unlabelled cell fractions. The method based on nuclei extraction with pepsin digestion was optimized for a hybridoma line used in this study.
Williams
L S
LS
Flow Cytometry Laboratory, Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Nordberg
J A
JA
Chau
P C
PC
D000818:Animals; D001973:Bromodeoxyuridine; D002453:Cell Cycle / Q000502:physiology; D004247:DNA / Q000032:analysis*; D005434:Flow Cytometry; D006358:Hot Temperature; D006825:Hybridomas / Q000032:analysis* / Q000166:cytology; D006851:Hydrochloric Acid; D007150:Immunohistochemistry / Q000379:methods*; D051379:Mice; D009691:Nucleic Acid Denaturation; D010434:Pepsin A
D004247:DNA; D010434:Pepsin A; D001973:Bromodeoxyuridine; D006851:Hydrochloric Acid